Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] shadow-sysroot: new recipe for useradd.bbclass support

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 02:29 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven: Packaging login.defs with base-passwd causes problems due to the file being included in target package installs. Instead, this shadow-sysroot recipe can be used by useradd.bbclass to put login.defs into the target sysroot

Re: [OE-core] [poky] eggdbus build failure in master

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 00:51 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven: On 06/20/2011 01:20 PM, Darren Hart wrote: I'm seeing a consistent eggdbus build failure that seems to be related to the perl-native relocation. I've cleanall'd autoconf and automake, native and target versions. The failure

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gnome-vfs: remove gnome-vfs as it is deprecated in favour of GVFS and GIO

2011-06-21 Thread edwin . zhai
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com Remove unnecessary dependency via configure option and make oprofileui use GIO Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com --- .../oprofileui/migrate-from-gnomevfs-to-gio.patch | 219 meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofileui_git.bb

Re: [OE-core] Question about apply eglibc configurability to create minimal image

2011-06-21 Thread Kang Kai
Hi Mark, According this list, expand with their run time depency(show in the attachment minimal-image-runtime-dependies.png) , and the list is: base-files \ base-passwd \ busybox \ busybox-syslog \ busybox-udhcpc \ initscripts \ makedevs \

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] qt4-tools-nativesdk: fix unpack failure due to missing g++.conf

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 00:56:48 Khem Raj wrote: On 06/18/2011 11:56 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: FILESPATHPKG was being used to in order to bring in linux.conf and g++.conf in this recipe, however this probably never worked since FILESPATHPKG always has the MACHINE appended to it and these are

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/5 v3][PULL] 3G support in Yocto

2011-06-21 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Hi, This is the 3rd version of 3G patches, please help to review and pull. Changes from v2: 1) Drop the changes to systemtap since Tom already has fixes. 2) Adopt some logic in meta-oe to handle RDEPENDS for connman recipe. 3) Drop some changes for connman-gnome. 3) Revise some commit message.

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-21 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Enable ofono plugin. Adopt some logic in meta-oe on connman plugin runtime dependency. Remove the fix-shutdown-ap-disconnect.patch since the original logic no longer exists. Add Upstream-Status information for patches. Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] initscript: Change some order of init scripts

2011-06-21 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Move udev script to execute ealier since module autoload needs it to create device nodes. Also move sysfs before udev which has dependency on it. Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb |6 +++---

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] wpa-supplicant: remove the 0.6.10 version.

2011-06-21 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Remove the 0.6.10 version since now 0.7.3 is the latest stable version. Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com --- .../wpa-supplicant-0.6.10/99_wpa_supplicant|1 - .../wpa-supplicant-0.6.10/defaults-sane|8 - .../wpa-supplicant-0.6.10/defconfig-0.6.0-gnutls

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] connman-gnome: Add 3G configuration support

2011-06-21 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Apply 3g.patch which add cellular config option in connman-gnome. Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com --- .../connman/connman-gnome/3g.patch | 505 .../connman/connman-gnome_0.5.bb |8 +- 2 files changed, 510 insertions(+),

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:08 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: -DEPENDS = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables -RDEPENDS_${PN} = wpa-supplicant resolvconf +DEPENDS = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables ofono wpa-supplicant resolvconf bluez4 What does the dependency stack for ofono look like? If

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 11:12 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:08 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: -DEPENDS = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables -RDEPENDS_${PN} = wpa-supplicant resolvconf +DEPENDS = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables ofono wpa-supplicant

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:12, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:08 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: -DEPENDS  = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables -RDEPENDS_${PN} = wpa-supplicant resolvconf +DEPENDS  = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables ofono wpa-supplicant resolvconf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] connman: Upgrade to version 0.75

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 11:34 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:12, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:08 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: -DEPENDS = libgdbus dbus glib-2.0 hal iptables -RDEPENDS_${PN} = wpa-supplicant resolvconf

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Remove obsolete gnome-vfs

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 09:12 heeft edwin.z...@intel.com het volgende geschreven: From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com This patch removed obsolete gnome-vfs in favor of GIO/GVFS. Thanks for the patch! I've gone through meta-oe and only libgnome requires gnome-vfs at this point, but virtually

[OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is available on the branch: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpurdie/ml There have been a few issues and some

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] clutter: Use new git repo

2011-06-21 Thread edwin . zhai
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com clutter-project.org moved its git repo to gnome.org, so need update SRC_URI. [YOCTO #1040] got fixed. The following changes since commit aa366699d62266365c6acd5bea71f02aedb63adc: gnome-vfs: remove gnome-vfs as it is deprecated in favour of GVFS and GIO

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no need to have e.g. both 32 and 64 bit libs. Frans. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:28 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 21 jun 2011, om 14:14 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 8:02 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no need to have e.g. both 32 and 64 bit libs. 64-bit database on a 32-bit system. 64-bit

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/21/2011 05:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is available on the branch:

Re: [OE-core] Using TCLIBC = uclibc in oe-core

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/21/2011 07:04 AM, Tom Parkin wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to set up a working openembedded-core/uClibc mipsel environment. I found that setting TCLIBC = uclibc in local.conf yielded the following: ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'glib-2.0-native' I traced this down to code in

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 9:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote: On 06/21/2011 05:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: We've been experimenting with multilib and I now feel it right to discuss the changes a bit further now there is something to discuss :). The work so far on this is available on the branch:

Re: [OE-core] Using TCLIBC = uclibc in oe-core

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 9:04 AM, Tom Parkin wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to set up a working openembedded-core/uClibc mipsel environment. I found that setting TCLIBC = uclibc in local.conf yielded the following: ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'glib-2.0-native' I traced this down to code in

Re: [OE-core] BUG: intltool depends on libxml-parser-perl to be installed on host

2011-06-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:20, Cui, Dexuan dexuan@intel.com wrote: I think I can reproduce the issue with the same steps on a Ubuntu 10.10 host. I'm going to further look into this. Please report a bug on the bugzilla, so we can better track it. :-) Sorry but I don't have an account on the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Integrate ccache-native

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
Just looking for a status review on this item. Does this implement the task: Performance Improvements - CCACHE per recipe c) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis. need to figure out whether ccache data can be shared and under what circumstances. ? I just need to update them with the status,

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware, and there is no need to have e.g. both 32

[OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
I've had the task to resolve the directory permissions and ownership issues. From the original RFC I sent out, a lot has changed. The way OE, opkg and deb packages are defined, there is no way to define what package owns a directory. There is an expectation that directory permissions, owner and

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On 06/21/2011 06:33 AM, Eric Bénard wrote: Hi, On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know the target hardware,

Re: [OE-core] Using TCLIBC = uclibc in oe-core

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:54 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:04 +0100, Tom Parkin wrote: The attached patch allows me to (at least) assemble the bitbake task list when TCLIBC = uclibc. I'm not sure whether this is the correct approach, though. Do you know why

Re: [OE-core] Multilib Development Update

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:33 +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: Hi, On 21/06/2011 15:30, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 15:02 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: As I already asked before: what is the benefit having this in embedded systems? If I am doing an embedded system I know

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Fix for bitbake freeze due to git fetch during parse

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
Addresses [YOCTO #1186]. See patch for further details. (Sending against poky-contrib since OE git is currently experiencing issues.) The following changes since commit 2163461ec94528ecf046a04edc5db3d2dd3a6b8b: systemtap: remove non-core COMPATIBLE_MACHINES (2011-06-16 22:14:06 +0100) are

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
If we use a tag here then bitbake has to connect to the repository to find out the corresponding revision (so it can expand SRCPV which is part of PV, which amongst other things is needed to determine whether or not the package has to be rebuilt.) This occurs at parse time; on machines behind a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Joshua Lock
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: If we use a tag here then bitbake has to connect to the repository to find out the corresponding revision (so it can expand SRCPV which is part of PV, which amongst other things is needed to determine whether or not the package has to be

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 19:29 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: If we use a tag here then bitbake has to connect to the repository to find out the corresponding revision (so it can expand SRCPV which is part of PV, which amongst other things is needed to determine whether or not the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 18:34:54 Koen Kooi wrote: Can you add a comment above the rev in the lines of bitbake sucks, we need to use a rev instead of a tag, this one maps to 2011.03? I will add a comment about the revision corresponding to the tag, good idea. However, if you do specify a tag

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 21 June 2011 18:33:17 Joshua Lock wrote: Great work tracking this down! Thanks, actually Dexuan gets the credit for at least pointing me in the right direction. I wonder if it's worth mentioning in the metadata that the revision corresponds to the tag? Done, have updated the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 19:42 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: On Tuesday 21 June 2011 18:34:54 Koen Kooi wrote: Can you add a comment above the rev in the lines of bitbake sucks, we need to use a rev instead of a tag, this one maps to 2011.03? I will add a comment about the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] u-boot: set SRCREV to a git revision instead of a tag reference

2011-06-21 Thread Tom Rini
On 06/21/2011 10:59 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 21 June 2011 18:54:12 Koen Kooi wrote: Since we're using the 2011.03 tag, why is SRCPV in PV at all? It should be exactly the same as the tarball. One might go one step further and ask why fetching from git is a good idea when the

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Linux 3.0 build support

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
This work is unfinished and incomplete... It is published in its current form both to get feedback, but also to aid anyone else who is working on 3.0-support. If some of the patches are found to be OK, it's fine to cherrypick them. The kernel-related classes has been modified to build a 3.0

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 4/5] modutils-initscripts: move recipe prior to modutils removal

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../{modutils = module-init-tools}/files/PD.patch |0 .../files/modutils.sh |0 .../modutils-initscripts.bb|0 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../module-init-tools-cross_3.12.bb|2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/module-init-tools/module-init-tools-cross_3.12.bb

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/5] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 22 +++--- meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 3/5] linux-kernel-base: add support for Linux 3.x

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
Return 2.X as major version for kernels 2.X, and return X for kernels X.Y (X=3). Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass

[OE-core] [RFC PATCH 5/5] modutils: remove modutils

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
As 2.4 support is being phased out, remove modutils. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/armeb.patch | 16 meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/configure.patch | 34 --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/gcc4.patch |

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 20:18 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../module-init-tools-cross_3.12.bb|2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:22, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Don't you need at least 3.13 (or better 3.16) for proper 3.0 support? This one was added after 3.12:

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 3/5] linux-kernel-base: add support for Linux 3.x

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: Return 2.X as major version for kernels 2.X, and return X for kernels X.Y (X=3). I'm not quite sure I understand what this particular logic is useful for. If we're removing 2.4 support (which I'm fairly relaxed about) then it seems as

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: -PROVIDES += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6 +PROVIDES += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6 virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-3 Can we not just ditch the versioned

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/5] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 22 +++--- meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |2 +- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) This patch looks

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:43 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Adjust the umask to 022. This resolves the problem of dynamically generated directories (mkdir -p) and specific files (touch foo) having odd permissions.

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:46, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: -PROVIDES += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6 +PROVIDES += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 1/5] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:47, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se ---  meta/classes/kernel.bbclass      |   22 +++---  meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |    2 +-  2

[OE-core] [cross-post] OE web- and git-server are down

2011-06-21 Thread Yury Bushmelev
Hello! We have some problems on machine which are running OE web-site, OE git-server and patchwork. Our admins crew are working hardly to resolve this. Please use our git mirror: https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded.git Thanks for your patience. P.S. This is cross-post. Please check

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 3/5] linux-kernel-base: add support for Linux 3.x

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:45, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: Return 2.X as major version for kernels 2.X, and return X for kernels X.Y (X=3). I'm not quite sure I understand what this particular logic is useful for.  If we're

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 1:57 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:43 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Adjust the umask to 022. This resolves the problem of dynamically generated directories (mkdir -p) and specific files (touch foo) having odd permissions.

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 2/6] image-types.bbclass: get the image size in the whole number

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Avoid fractions like 80.72 and round them to whole numbers. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- meta/classes/image_types.bbclass |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 3/6] image_types.bbclass: enable btrfs as one of the image type

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- meta/classes/image_types.bbclass |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass b/meta/classes/image_types.bbclass index

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 0/6] enable btrfs images

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com These patches enable the btrfs image support in the poky tree. Other than kernel parts all the parts are ready here. linux-yocto-2.6.37 kernel need some work to get latest btrfs working, and that part will be sent separately. The following changes

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 5/6] base-files: add btrfs to /etc/filesystems

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- .../recipes-core/base-files/base-files/filesystems |1 + meta/recipes-core/base-files/base-files_3.0.14.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 4/6] qemu machine: enable btrfs as one of the supported filesystem

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/qemu.inc index

[OE-core] [btrfs patch 6/6] scripts/runqemu: enable btrfs

2011-06-21 Thread nitin . a . kamble
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com --- scripts/runqemu |6 +++--- scripts/runqemu-internal | 12 ++-- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/runqemu b/scripts/runqemu index

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:12 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: fs-perms.txt is the default name. It was done to work similarly to the 'device_table-minimal.txt' file that already exists. The logic is: Use the variable FILESYSTEM_PERMS_TABLES, the contents of this may be full paths, or partial

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
(Note, I found an additional issue mentioned at the end of this email...) On 6/21/11 4:09 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:12 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: fs-perms.txt is the default name. It was done to work similarly to the 'device_table-minimal.txt' file that already exists.

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 21 jun 2011, om 21:12 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 6/21/11 1:57 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:43 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Adjust the umask to 022. This resolves the problem of dynamically generated directories (mkdir -p) and specific files (touch foo)

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:27 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: I don't know how to do this within bitbake (easily). The table is currently a static set of paths that exist within the distribution as a whole. They are not recipe specific, but you can have more then one file... the assumption is

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 4:32 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 21 jun 2011, om 21:12 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 6/21/11 1:57 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:43 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Adjust the umask to 022. This resolves the problem of dynamically generated directories

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:41 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Unfortunately it won't work as the umask would only be set in the mytask - task. It needs to be set in all of the do_install and do_package tasks. The only way to do this (from what Chris L told me) is to setup an event handler and set

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 14:12 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 6/21/11 1:57 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:43 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: Adjust the umask to 022. This resolves the problem of dynamically generated directories (mkdir -p) and specific files (touch foo) having odd

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
I like that better then trying to wrap do_install and such with special code. It should be fairly easy to set the default for do_install and do_package then. I wonder if there would be a way to notice and flag as possible errors tasks running between do_install and do_package (in a single

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] shadow-sysroot: new recipe for useradd.bbclass support

2011-06-21 Thread Scott Garman
On 06/20/2011 11:30 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 21 jun 2011, om 02:29 heeft Scott Garman het volgende geschreven: Packaging login.defs with base-passwd causes problems due to the file being included in target package installs. Instead, this shadow-sysroot recipe can be used by useradd.bbclass to

[OE-core] Patterns in the hackery various classes need - Need API change?

2011-06-21 Thread Richard Purdie
I've spent quite a bit of time recently staring at the insanity that some of our core classes have. That code generally works so people like to leave it well alone but when you look at some of it, there is some nasty stuff going on. Taking cross.bbclass as an example: # Save PACKAGE_ARCH

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 4:37 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:27 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: I don't know how to do this within bitbake (easily). The table is currently a static set of paths that exist within the distribution as a whole. They are not recipe specific, but you can have

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Integrate ccache-native

2011-06-21 Thread wenzong fan
On 06/21/2011 11:45 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: Just looking for a status review on this item. Does this implement the task: Performance Improvements - CCACHE per recipe c) Set CCACHE on a per recipe basis. need to figure out whether ccache data can be shared and under what circumstances. ?

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] eglibc: Upgrade recipes from 2.13 - 2.14

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- ...tive_2.13.bb = cross-localedef-native_2.14.bb} |0 .../IO-acquire-lock-fix.patch |0 .../eglibc-svn-arm-lowlevellock-include-tls.patch |0 .../{eglibc-2.13 = eglibc-2.14}/etc/ld.so.conf|0

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] tcmode-default.inc: Bump EGLIBCVERSION to 2.14

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc index 90282ee..20fc119 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] uclibc and related fixes

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
Fix uclibc build for x86_64 gettext compile failed on uclibc so fix it and additionally remove unused patches Add required support for systemd to function with uclibc Quash a parse warning where uclibc-initial and uclibc both provided libsegfault The following changes since commit

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] uclibc.inc: libsegfault is only RPROVIDED by uclibc

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
Using ${PN} also means that uclibc-initial gets to provide it which we do not want Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] uclibc: Add support for $ORIGIN

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
This is required by systemd Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- .../uclibc/uclibc-git/orign_path.patch | 183 + meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc-git/rtld_no.patch | 215 meta/recipes-core/uclibc/uclibc_git.bb |4 +- 3

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] gettext-0.18.1.1: Remove unused patches

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
gettext-error_print_progname.patch is already applied upstream others are unapplied. Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- .../gettext/gettext-0.18.1.1/autotools.patch | 64 .../gettext-error_print_progname.patch | 15 -

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] binutils_2.21.bb: Fix ld segfault exposed by eglibc 2.14 on x86_64

2011-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com --- .../binutils/binutils-2.21/binutils-pr12366.patch | 428 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.21.bb|3 +- 2 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/21/11 5:13 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: I like that better then trying to wrap do_install and such with special code. It should be fairly easy to set the default for do_install and do_package then. I wonder if there would be a way to notice and flag as possible errors tasks running

Re: [OE-core] Directory permissions and ownership -- RFC

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 23:27, Mark Hatle mark.ha...@windriver.com wrote: Note, there is one remaining issue that I haven't resolved.  A few directories are defined in terms of symlinks:  /var/cache root root 120777 volatile/cache +/var/cache root root 40755  /var/log root root 120777

Re: [OE-core] [RFC PATCH 2/5] module-init-tools-cross: add provides for depmod-3

2011-06-21 Thread Anders Darander
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 21:03, Anders Darander anders.daran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:46, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote: -PROVIDES += virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6 +PROVIDES