[openflow-discuss] Openflow discussion in the e2e mailing list

FYI ... ... there is an interesting ongoing discussion in the e2e mailing list about OpenFlow http://www.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/2011-April/008164.html -niky ___ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https:/

Re: [openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

okay,I will give a try with OVS 1.1 version. Thanks for help and support it was really helpful. Anil On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:09:07AM +0530, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > > I suspect that your switch is going into "fail open" mode and > > > forwa

Re: [openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:09:07AM +0530, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > I suspect that your switch is going into "fail open" mode and > > forwarding each packet as a regular switch would. You should be able > > to see that in the logs. It would also be visible as an additional > > high-priority rule in

Re: [openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

Hi Ben, On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > [Adding openflow-discuss back. Please don't drop the mailing list.] > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Anil Vishnoi > wrote: > > I am using the open vSwitch 1.1.0 pre2 version and I downloaded from > > openvswitch.org following

Re: [openflow-discuss] [nox-dev] NOX or Beacon

I'm not sure you can really 'prove' which is better, all controllers will have their pros and cons, and a lot of it is in the eye of the beholder. Questions such as which programming language(s) you are comfortable with, what sort of minimum performance you need to achieve, what features are a

Re: [openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

[Adding openflow-discuss back. Please don't drop the mailing list.] On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > I am using the open vSwitch 1.1.0 pre2 version and I downloaded from > openvswitch.org following the instruction mentioned in the URL below : 1.1.0pre2 is old. You should

Re: [openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:56:15PM +0530, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > I created a set-up of following 4 mahine : > > Controller--->eth0 OpenvSwitch > eth4 > eth3 > Inst

Re: [openflow-discuss] [nox-dev] NOX or Beacon

btw, I poked through Trema recently. It looks like a *great* project. Very clean. .martin Hi, Thanks to Christian to refer Trema. I agree that it highly depends on what you want to do. Trema is an open source modular framework for developing OpenFlow controllers in Ruby/C. If you like ea

Re: [openflow-discuss] [nox-dev] NOX or Beacon

Hi, Thanks to Christian to refer Trema. I agree that it highly depends on what you want to do. Trema is an open source modular framework for developing OpenFlow controllers in Ruby/C. If you like easy of programmability rather than performance in terms of event processing, or if you are using

Re: [openflow-discuss] [nox-dev] NOX or Beacon

Hi This question of performance comparison is more appropriate for the openflow-discuss list that I've copied here. Please drop nox-dev in subsequent mails. Thanks Srini. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Christian Esteve Rothenberg wrote: > Hamilton, > > You can add Maestro (Rice University) and

Re: [openflow-discuss] Simple Handover(Without using AP's)‏‏

Hi Ali, I have been trying to get to this and realized this is getting pushed back more and more on my plate. So short answers > What do you mean by checking the flow entries of the switches??? Use dpctl dump-flows to see what flows are in the switches. You can bring up the terminals for t

[openflow-discuss] Manually added flow (using ovs-ofctl) shows zero match.Help needed.

Hi, I created a set-up of following 4 mahine : Controller--->eth0 OpenvSwitch eth4