Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-20 Thread Luis Gomez
}, > >>>> >"packet-count": 0 > >>>> >}, > >>>> > "priority": 0, > >>>> >&quo

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-20 Thread Sai MarapaReddy
I am not sure what is the impact but > definitely something to look at. > >>>> > > >>>> > I think in general we will need l2switch support to > troubleshoot and progress in current issues. > >>>> >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-20 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
> BR/Luis >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Miroslav Macko >>>> >>> <mailto:miroslav.ma...@pantheon.tech>> wrote: >>>

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-19 Thread Sai MarapaReddy
>> Od: Luis Gomez >>> >> Odoslané: 15. októbra 2016 1:01 >>> >> Komu: Tomáš Slušný >>> >> Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev >>> >> Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis &g

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-19 Thread Luis Gomez
gt; >>> > BR/Luis >>> > >>> > >>> >> On Oct 17, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Miroslav Macko >>> >> mailto:miroslav.ma...@pantheon.tech>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hello Luis and dev guys, >>> >> >>> &

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-19 Thread Luis Gomez
> >> There is this info from l2-switch in the karaf log: >> >> >> >> 2016-10-14 22:43:24,941 | INFO | pool-16-thread-1 | >> >> FlowWriterServiceImpl| 229 - >> >> org.opendaylight.l2switch.main.impl - 0.5.0.SNAPSHOT | In >> >> addMacToMacFlowsUsingShortestPath: No flow

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-19 Thread Sai MarapaReddy
o flows added. >> Source and Destination ports are same. >> >> >> >> Is it ok? >> >> >> >> And this debug message(it has incorrect severity): >> >> >> >> 2016-10-14 22:43:55,282 | ERROR | entLoopGroup-5-3 | >> DeviceFl

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-18 Thread Luis Gomez
5,282 | ERROR | entLoopGroup-5-3 | > >> DeviceFlowRegistryImpl | 210 - > >> org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl - 0.4.0.SNAPSHOT | Flow with flowId > >> 85 already exists in table 0 > >> > >> So it looks like that flows with the same ID are added. &

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-18 Thread Sai MarapaReddy
43:55,282 | ERROR | entLoopGroup-5-3 | > DeviceFlowRegistryImpl | 210 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl > - 0.4.0.SNAPSHOT | Flow with flowId 85 already exists in table 0 > >> > >> So it looks like that flows with the same ID are added. > >> > >>

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-18 Thread Luis Gomez
| 210 - org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl - 0.4.0.SNAPSHOT | >> Flow with flowId 85 already exists in table 0 >> >> So it looks like that flows with the same ID are added. >> >> What in short these failing tests are doing and what it should test please? >>

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-18 Thread Luis Gomez
T | Flow > with flowId 85 already exists in table 0 > > So it looks like that flows with the same ID are added. > > What in short these failing tests are doing and what it should test please? > > Thanks, > Miro > > ____ > Od: Luis Gomez &

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-17 Thread Shuva Jyoti Kar
ndaylight.org> [mailto:openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Abhijit Kumbhare Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:24 PM To: Luis Gomez Cc: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis About the f

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-17 Thread Miroslav Macko
-Dev Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis No luck :), still fails on "address tracker" and "loop remover": https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-carbon/154/ https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Shuva Jyoti Kar
Kumbhare Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:24 PM To: Luis Gomez Cc: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis About the first one - https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575: Tomas has said in yesterday's me

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
arbon >> here: >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/l2switch/job/l2switch-csit-1node-switch-only-carbon/ >> Od: Tomáš Slušný >> Odoslané: 14. októbra 2016 22:13 >> Komu: Luis Gomez; Abhijit Kumbhare >> Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
n/ > Od: Tomáš Slušný > Odoslané: 14. októbra 2016 22:13 > Komu: Luis Gomez; Abhijit Kumbhare > Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev > Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis > > ​6710 was related to both cluster and single nod

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Tomáš Slušný
? Od: Luis Gomez Odoslané: 14. októbra 2016 21:49 Komu: Abhijit Kumbhare Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis Well I think if openflowplugin people cannot figure out where the

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Tomáš Slušný
? Od: Luis Gomez Odoslané: 14. októbra 2016 21:49 Komu: Abhijit Kumbhare Kópia: An Ho; openflowplugin-dev; OpenDayLight-L2switch-Dev Predmet: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis Well I think if openflowplugin people cannot figure out where the issue is, the next

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > > > > On 10/14/2016 12:37 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >> >>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Jamo Luhrsen >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/13/2016 09:50 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: Hi all, We are getting clo

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
On 10/14/2016 12:37 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Jamo Luhrsen > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/13/2016 09:50 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We are getting close to Boron SR1 so I think it makes sense to review the 2 >>> blocking issue

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
Well I think if openflowplugin people cannot figure out where the issue is, the next would be to get some debug and further analysis from l2switch people explaining the application miss-behavior. If there are no people available in l2switch to do this, we can lower the priority to major or crit

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:18 AM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > > > > On 10/13/2016 09:50 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We are getting close to Boron SR1 so I think it makes sense to review the 2 >> blocking issues we have: >> >> >> 1) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 >> >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Luis Gomez
As far as I can tell nothing we have done so far has helped l2switch test, it is still failing. BR/Luis > On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > > About the first one - https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 > :

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Abhijit Kumbhare
About the first one - https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575: Tomas has said in yesterday's meeting that this was dependent on https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6710. And that it was fixed. Can we retest? Also a question for Tomas: 6710 is cluster related - while 6575 is no

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Blocker bug analysis

2016-10-14 Thread Jamo Luhrsen
On 10/13/2016 09:50 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > Hi all, > > We are getting close to Boron SR1 so I think it makes sense to review the 2 > blocking issues we have: > > > 1) https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6575 > > Summary: > > l2switch does not work well when mininet is disconnecte