I've been quite impressed by the YAWL work of van der Alst at
Eindhoven. It is probably technically superior to
some of the other workflow systems out their, particularly in its
richness and accuracy of expressing workflow, but I don't
believe it supports any of the standards out there. Thus
Philippe,
Actually, I am still talking about Wayne's focus on the user. As a
project manager I spend much of my time in a balancing act by
advocating for someone else's perspective. When I work with with IT
developers and vendors, the most important missing voice is generally
the
Communication between HIS isn't specifically a need of a citizen, just
the results of it. It has been
almost impossible for a patient to be able to see or possess a record of
their healthcare which is
being done by a variety of organizations and providers. This need for
a virtual healthcare
I wholeheartedly agree with you, Will!Do you have some example
workflow diagrams that
you have found useful?
Dave
Will Ross wrote:
Philippe,
Actually, I am still talking about Wayne's focus on the user. As a
project manager I spend much of my time in a balancing act by
advocating
Will,
Who is the user you want to show workflow diagrams too?
Is he/she an health professional or a citizen/patient?
From my point of view, and according to the tools I already elaborated
and tested, the health professional should be provided with two
different kind of tools : front office
Philippe AMELINE wrote:
I am ok to put a workflow engine among the front office services, but
are you talking about a workflow of people/acts (something like a care
path) or a workflow of documents?
Good point Philippe from my now outdated experience with workflow
tools, there used
Philippe AMELINE wrote:
Will,
Who is the user you want to show workflow diagrams too?
Is he/she an health professional or a citizen/patient?
I can't speak for Will, but I think workflow is useful for the tasks
that people need to do in
caring for a patient. In the work we did with City
David,
I am not very at ease with this vision.
Let's express it simply: what you try to do with a person/care workflow
is to make sure that will be present, at a given place and a given time,
the patient, the professionals and the proper material.
If you work in the care place's referential,
David Forslund wrote:
I've been quite impressed by the YAWL work of van der Alst at
Eindhoven. It is probably technically superior to
some of the other workflow systems out their, particularly in its
richness and accuracy of expressing workflow, but I don't
believe it supports any of the
Tim.Churches wrote:
I don't know how big this problem is, but I do know that attempts to
have universal graphical languages so far have only succeeded in
specialist areas after many years. They haven't worked in programming -
else we would all be using UML to program with.
Thanks
I've joined this group - thanks for accepting. But, I'd like to join using a
non-yahoo account. Did I miss some instruction on a web page somewhere that
tells me how to do that?
Thanks.
Richard Schilling
-
New Yahoo! Messenger
Richard --
You're welcome - the group is open to all who are interested in
healthcare FOSS.
Go to yahoogroups.com - with your Yahoo id, you can associate multiple
e-mail addresses, and decide which is the one that receives mail sent to
the list. Write to me off list if you need help (but I
I think what Philippe is talking about (continuity of care) is how
the hospital moves a patient through their medical organization to
get treatment. The view he describes was typically used to describe
patient care from the clinician's viewpoint. That is, how a
continuity of care for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Forslund wrote:
I'm trying to understand what these reference view points have to do
with getting the data between organizations.
In a single care place, the data for the patient may have to come from
multiple locations to be available to
Tim Cook wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Forslund wrote:
I'm trying to understand what these reference view points have to do
with getting the data between organizations.
In a single care place, the data for the patient may have to come from
multiple
Dave,
Attached is a diagram which is part of a practice management software
replacement project I am managing for a group of rural ambulatory
clinics. This particular diagram maps the initial steps at one
clinic as Reception interacts with the current software (HP) when a
patient
Joseph,
I disagree on your community challenge. I think the community
aspect of open source is not only over rated, it is in fact a
negative, a risk factor to be considered. I think what we need is
software that works better than what we have, and so by progressive
iterative cycles we
oops. now i posted the document in the openhealth files section.
[wr]
- - - - - - - -
On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:01 PM, David Forslund wrote:
As you probably noticed, images (and attachments) are stripped off by
the mailer, so the diagram isn't visible. :-(
What is the communication between
Is this workflow put into a computable form or is it just to help
understand the various processes?
If it is computable, what are you using to describe the workflow. This
type of workflow
is rather easily described in XPDL, for example, and can drive the
various tasks and user inputs.
Most of
19 matches
Mail list logo
