Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Surprising bug (???) migrating a root pool

2016-09-22 Thread Hans J Albertsson
Commercially, sunrays are dead. Like totally.

Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5

Den 22 sep. 2016 18:09 skrev "cjt" :

> On 09/22/2016 08:40 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
>
>> I tried migrating the root pool from a small and slow disk with 512 byte
>> blocks to a larger disk of 2TB with 4k blocks.
>>
>> So I connected the larger disk as c1t1d0, partitioned with an smi label
>> and
>> a single slice s0 covering the whole disk. I mad
>> I did
>> zpool create nxtroot c1t1d0s0
>> zfs snapshot -r rpool@moove
>> zfs send -R rpool@moove | zfs receive -Fd nxtroot
>> zpool export nxtroot
>>
>> Then I removed the old rpool disk , and rebooted into live DVD for oi
>> 151a7
>> (which is necessary, because later 151distros won't run SunRay software
>> services which is la raison d'être pour cet ordinateur) 
>>
>
> Is anything being done to address that shortcoming?  Is the SunRay
> effectively dead?
>
>
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Surprising bug (???) migrating a root pool

2016-09-22 Thread Hans J Albertsson
I'm going to try a later srss under hipster. Hipster 16.04 seems closer to
s11.3 or s12 that works very well with srss. Otherwise I might have to
revert to Oracle s11 or 12. Which costs.

Our sunrays are perfect for a quietroom environment.

Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5

Den 22 sep. 2016 18:09 skrev "cjt" :

> On 09/22/2016 08:40 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
>
>> I tried migrating the root pool from a small and slow disk with 512 byte
>> blocks to a larger disk of 2TB with 4k blocks.
>>
>> So I connected the larger disk as c1t1d0, partitioned with an smi label
>> and
>> a single slice s0 covering the whole disk. I mad
>> I did
>> zpool create nxtroot c1t1d0s0
>> zfs snapshot -r rpool@moove
>> zfs send -R rpool@moove | zfs receive -Fd nxtroot
>> zpool export nxtroot
>>
>> Then I removed the old rpool disk , and rebooted into live DVD for oi
>> 151a7
>> (which is necessary, because later 151distros won't run SunRay software
>> services which is la raison d'être pour cet ordinateur) 
>>
>
> Is anything being done to address that shortcoming?  Is the SunRay
> effectively dead?
>
>
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Surprising bug (???) migrating a root pool

2016-09-22 Thread Hans J Albertsson
There are lots of sunray 3+s around, so I'm keeping my environment up. Some
day I might have to give up, but a totally quiet computer where even the
tiny unavoidable residual noise of anything electrical is random in
character is still years off.

Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5

Den 22 sep. 2016 18:09 skrev "cjt" :

> On 09/22/2016 08:40 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:
>
>> I tried migrating the root pool from a small and slow disk with 512 byte
>> blocks to a larger disk of 2TB with 4k blocks.
>>
>> So I connected the larger disk as c1t1d0, partitioned with an smi label
>> and
>> a single slice s0 covering the whole disk. I mad
>> I did
>> zpool create nxtroot c1t1d0s0
>> zfs snapshot -r rpool@moove
>> zfs send -R rpool@moove | zfs receive -Fd nxtroot
>> zpool export nxtroot
>>
>> Then I removed the old rpool disk , and rebooted into live DVD for oi
>> 151a7
>> (which is necessary, because later 151distros won't run SunRay software
>> services which is la raison d'être pour cet ordinateur) 
>>
>
> Is anything being done to address that shortcoming?  Is the SunRay
> effectively dead?
>
>
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Surprising bug (???) migrating a root pool

2016-09-22 Thread cjt

On 09/22/2016 08:40 AM, Hans J Albertsson wrote:

I tried migrating the root pool from a small and slow disk with 512 byte
blocks to a larger disk of 2TB with 4k blocks.

So I connected the larger disk as c1t1d0, partitioned with an smi label and
a single slice s0 covering the whole disk. I mad
I did
zpool create nxtroot c1t1d0s0
zfs snapshot -r rpool@moove
zfs send -R rpool@moove | zfs receive -Fd nxtroot
zpool export nxtroot

Then I removed the old rpool disk , and rebooted into live DVD for oi 151a7
(which is necessary, because later 151distros won't run SunRay software
services which is la raison d'être pour cet ordinateur) 


Is anything being done to address that shortcoming?  Is the SunRay 
effectively dead?



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Surprising bug (???) migrating a root pool

2016-09-22 Thread Hans J Albertsson
I tried migrating the root pool from a small and slow disk with 512 byte
blocks to a larger disk of 2TB with 4k blocks.

So I connected the larger disk as c1t1d0, partitioned with an smi label and
a single slice s0 covering the whole disk. I mad
I did
zpool create nxtroot c1t1d0s0
zfs snapshot -r rpool@moove
zfs send -R rpool@moove | zfs receive -Fd nxtroot
zpool export nxtroot

Then I removed the old rpool disk , and rebooted into live DVD for oi 151a7
(which is necessary, because later 151distros won't run SunRay software
services which is la raison d'être pour cet ordinateur) and did
zpool import nxtroot tool

Seemed quite OK.

Rebooted to the new rpool, and this fails: the
zfs mount -a
that occurs at startup still sees nxtroot AND rpool both, and some bits are
mounted from nxtroot/.., some bits from rpool/..

What gives?

After this attempt at using the new rpool, it gets corrupted and can't even
be destroyed.

I'm guessing that 151a7 is too old for this for some reason, and the
problem could be the size, maybe rpools need to be <1TB in 151a7?

Hans J. Albertsson
From my Nexus 5
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss