[Openjdk] [Bug 1964474] Re: openjdk-default installs buggy JDK version 11.0.14 where newer version 11.0.14.1 is available (java.net.HttpClient is buggy)

2022-08-28 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1966338 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966338 I'm closing this based on your lastest comment. For future reference you can change the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status. You can

[Openjdk] [Bug 1940845] Re: Unavailability of OpenJDK8 verion 8u302-b08

2021-08-28 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Thanks for reporting. I don't know if it was a coincidence or direct response, but I see that impish-proposed now has version 8u302-b08-0ubuntu2 [1]. Though it has been packaged, it hasn't yet migrated to the release archive, looks like it is currently blocked by some issues with newer glibc

[Openjdk] [Bug 1916381] Re: error detected: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (11.0.8+10)

2021-02-21 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Package changed: ubuntu => openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-lts in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916381 Title: error detected: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (11.0.8+10) Status in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1754276] Re: Update openjdk 9 to 9.0.4

2018-03-08 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754276 Title: Update openjdk 9 to 9.0.4 Status in openjdk-9 package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Openjdk] [Bug 1753302] Re: package openjdk-9-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_openjdk-9.py', which is also in packag

2018-03-04 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1738579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738579 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1738579, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1744380] Re: openjdk-9-jre-headless jexec points to wrong location for jre

2018-01-19 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1744380 Title: openjdk-9-jre-headless jexec points to wrong location for jre Status in openjdk-9 package in Ubuntu:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1738579] Re: package openjdk-10-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_openjdk-9.py', which is also in packa

2017-12-31 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Also affects: openjdk-9 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738579 Title: package openjdk-10-jre-headless (not installed)

[Openjdk] [Bug 1740683] Re: package openjdk-9-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_openjdk-9.py', which is also in packag

2017-12-31 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1738579 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738579 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1738579, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1537972] Re: Provide JRE compiled with javac -g flag

2017-12-06 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537972 Title: Provide JRE compiled with javac -g flag Status in openjdk-7 package in Ubuntu: New Status in

[Openjdk] [Bug 1734220] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h », qui appartient

2017-11-24 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial

2017-10-18 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Also affects: xenial-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721397 Title: Backport final version of

[Openjdk] [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins

2017-09-04 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714956 Title: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins Status in openjdk-8 package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Openjdk] [Bug 1694539] Re: Segfault in embedded Webkit Browser

2017-05-31 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to openjdk-8 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694539 Title: Segfault in embedded Webkit Browser Status in openjdk-8 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description:

[Openjdk] [Bug 1550950] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package openjdk-

2017-02-26 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
>Still facing the issue from xenial repos, could some one re open the issue The bug report in general was marked as fixed released since the issue is resolved in Ubuntu 16.10 and later (ref comment #3). However there is still an open task to also fix it in 16.04 (Xenial), see under Affects

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2017-01-09 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
>How come it never got backported? I guess nobody requested it for an older release before now, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure for details. Though, I do wonder whether what you are experiencing is the exact same issue. According to bug 1560405 and

[Openjdk] [Bug 1636803] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b114-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobre-escrever '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', que também está no pac

2016-10-27 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1631844] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h », qui appartient

2016-10-10 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1630712] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package o

2016-10-05 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1622723] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di "/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h" presente anche nel pa

2016-09-12 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1622724] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di "/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h" presente anche nel pa

2016-09-12 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550950 package openjdk-9-jdk 9~b102-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is

[Openjdk] [Bug 1615372] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: poging tot overschrijven van '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', wat ook in pakket

2016-08-21 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1612889] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package o

2016-08-13 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1610635] Re: package openjdk-9-jdk (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/include/linux/jawt_md.h', which is also in package o

2016-08-07 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550950 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1550950, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Openjdk] [Bug 1518074] Re: keep openjdk-6 in -proposed, shouldn't be part of new releases anymore

2015-11-20 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1518073 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1518073 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1518073 keep openjdk-6 in -proposed, shouldn't be part of new releases anymore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,

[Openjdk] [Bug 1511421] Re: Error during "Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d"

2015-11-02 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
>No, I haven't changed the password. It's a fresh install... Ok, just checking. Thanks for providing the requested information. I briefly tested this by installing ca-certificates-java on a 15.10 vm, but I was unable to reproduce the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Openjdk] [Bug 1511421] Re: Error during "Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d"

2015-10-29 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Based on the error message, have you done any changes to the password for the keystore or this a first install? Also, could you please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather debugging

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2015-04-29 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396760 Title: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts Status in ca-certificates-java

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2015-02-01 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
https://bugs.debian.org/775775 Thanks, I wasn't able to trigger this on Debian. I've attached a bug watch so that we'll be notified when the issue is fixed. ** Also affects: ca-certificates-java (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775775 Importance: Unknown

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2015-01-17 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Has this also been reported upstream in Debian? No, I don't think so. I've tried here with a minimal Sid VM, but I have not been able to reproduce this issue nor bug 1406483 which I stumbled across recently. So while I would normally forward bugs to Debian, I am hesitant since I'm not able to

[Openjdk] [Bug 1406483] [NEW] Possible to install (and trigger postinstall) of ca-certificates-java before Java has been installed

2014-12-30 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Public bug reported: 1. Steps to reproduce: Depending on which packages you select for installation, it is possible the postinstall and trigger for ca-certificates-java run before Java has been installed. This may be possible to trigger with more combinations, but I've found $ sudo apt install

[Openjdk] [Bug 1406483] Re: Possible to install (and trigger postinstall) of ca-certificates-java before Java has been installed

2014-12-30 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
I briefly tried to see if I could reproduce this on Debian too, but on my Debian testing system I found Java was installed by default and thus set up in the right way out of the box. :/ I also found some variations in bug 983302 and bug 1396760 which ended up in the same situation as this issue.

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2014-12-30 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and help making Ubuntu better. I stumbled across this issue after I had reported a similar one. (Bug 1406483 where I triggered it by installing maven and openjdk-8-jdk) I was able to reproduce this issue when installing openjdk-8-jre- headless on

[Openjdk] [Bug 1396760] Re: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts

2014-12-30 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
** Tags added: utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK, which is subscribed to ca-certificates-java in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396760 Title: ca-certificates-java doesn't create /etc/ssl/certs/java/cacerts Status in

[Openjdk] [Bug 983302] Re: ca-certificates-java fails to install java cacerts on oneiric

2014-12-30 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
I haven't been able to reproduce this issue, but just want to mention that similar ones have been reported where it can be triggered by installing openjdk-8-jre-headless 8 (bug 1396760), or maven toghether with openjdk-8-jdk (bug 1406483). Looks like it is possible to end up in a situation where

[Openjdk] [Bug 1311366] Re: Upgrade to 7u55 version

2014-04-23 Thread Hans Joachim Desserud
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and help making Ubuntu better. I see that 7u55 has been packaged in Debian (http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openjdk-7.html), so I would assume it's not too far off. ** Tags added: upgrade-software-versionp ** Tags removed: