Hi Alex,
Do you have the following entry in the .desktop file of your application[1]:
StartupWMClass=com.foo.bar.FooApplication
-Abhinay
[1] https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder/pull/407
From: openjfx-dev on behalf of Alex Orlov
Sent: Thursday, May 26,
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:12:23 GMT, Florian Kirmaier wrote:
>> It's "a bit" complicated.
>> In some situations, getRuns get's called because listeners on bounds are set.
>> This causes TextFlow to layout to compute the runs.
>> Afterward, the bounds of the parents get updated.
>> This triggers a
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:29:04 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Fixing IndexOutOfBoundsException in the MultipleSelectionModelBase and added
>> a unit-test for it.
>> ticket: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256397
>> run test: `./gradlew --continue -PFULL_TEST=true controls:test --tests
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:50:16 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> After thinking about this issue for some time, I've now got a solution.
>> I know put the scene in the state it is, before is was shown, when the
>> dirtyNodes are unset, the whole scene is basically considered dirty.
>> This has
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:14:11 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Florian Kirmaier has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> JDK-8273485
>> Added check for null when calling initScreens
>
>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:05:10 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> When using Swing it's possible to generate a Deadlock.
>> It's related to the nested eventloop started in enterFullScreenExitingLoop
>> - and the RenderLock aquired when using setView in Scene.
>> Sample Programm and Threaddump are
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 07:52:31 GMT, Florian Kirmaier wrote:
>> This PR switches the Thread to the QuantumRenderer, in the case the Disposer
>> is called from another Thread - the printing Thread.
>> I'm open for better solutions on how to fix this Issue.
>> Initially i thought there is also a Race
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:04:56 GMT, Florian Kirmaier
wrote:
>> Making the initial listener of the ListProperty weak fixes the problem.
>> The same is fixed for Set and Map.
>> Due to a smart implementation, this is done without any performance drawback.
>> (The trick is to have an object, which
On 08.06.22 21:14, Philip Race wrote:
I am referring to windows native code we have in Java 2D.
It is completely invisible at the API level of Java 2D.
I understand that the public API does not provide this feature. Java 2D
itself listens to the events from Windows and updates the array of
On 6/8/22 11:34 AM, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
I don't know if there is an common event available in the Java2D
backend to detect added/removed printers directly. So far i could not
see anything like that.
I am referring to windows native code we have in Java 2D.
It is completely invisible
I don't know if there is an common event available in the Java2D backend
to detect added/removed printers directly. So far i could not see
anything like that.
Every PrintService instance should implement the equals() [1] method to
determine uniqueness. This could be used to compare/intersect
I already thought about using PrintServiceLookup. I could use it to show
the user the currently available printers, but I can't use it to create
a javafx.print.Printer instance without reflective access (JPMS).
At the moment I'm stuck with a an unmodifiable OberservableSet that
never updates.
Hi,
I use it through the javax.print API:
ObservableList printServices =
FXCollections.observableArrayList(
PrintServiceLookup.lookupPrintServices(null, null));
Maybe it may help for now, but to me it seems it should not be static.
Em ter., 7 de jun. de
Ahem .. well .. I guess we (I) forgot to get back to that.
Since the current implementation on Windows wraps the Java 2D printing code
and it registers with windows to be told about changes in printers then the
calls being made in the method with that comment would (well, should)
provide
the
Is there some way to update the ObservableSet of Printers once the
Application is running? Calling Printer.getAllPrinters() always returns
the same OberservableSet and it does not change - ever. [1]
We have an JavaFx based application running under Windows 10/11 that is
used to print on
On Tue, 31 May 2022 22:25:23 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Time is going short before openjfx 19...
>>
>> 2 options:
>> - keep dpqs for corner cases and keep my coding life simple
>> - disable or remove dpqs code in marlinFX for openjfx, so my branches will
>> diverge...
>>
>> Any
On Mon, 2 May 2022 19:55:28 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
>> Refactoring and renaming changes to some of the D3D pipeline files and a few
>> changes on the Java side. These are various "leftovers" from previous issues
>> that we didn't want to touch at the time in order to confine the scope of
>>
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:35:15 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> The `valueProperty()` and `chronologyProperty()` listener are now added in
> the second constructor of `DatePicker`
> (`public DatePicker(LocalDate localDate)`) instead of the first one (`public
> DatePicker()`).
> Therefore, both
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:35:15 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> The `valueProperty()` and `chronologyProperty()` listener are now added in
> the second constructor of `DatePicker`
> (`public DatePicker(LocalDate localDate)`) instead of the first one (`public
> DatePicker()`).
> Therefore, both
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 19:26:36 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
> When there's an APPLICATION_MODAL window, all other windows are disabled and
> re-enabled when the APPLICATION_MODAL window closes. This causes
> `requestToFront()` to be called on every window, and it does not guarantee
>
On Tue, 10 May 2022 12:56:53 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
>> When there's an APPLICATION_MODAL window, all other windows are disabled and
>> re-enabled when the APPLICATION_MODAL window closes. This causes
>> `requestToFront()` to be called on every window, and it does not guarantee
>>
On Wed, 25 May 2022 07:37:38 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
> keep dpqs for corner cases and keep my coding life simple
I think this approach is fine. Diverging the code would likely make it less
stable, and you answered the question about the provenance of the code, so
there's no issue there.
On Thu, 5 May 2022 16:21:45 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR fixes an issue with selection of multiple items in TableView and
> TreeTableView controls that gets moved unexpectedly when new items are added
> even way below the selected items.
>
> A couple of tests have been added. They fail
On Tue, 24 May 2022 09:51:29 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
>> This PR fixes an issue with selection of multiple items in TableView and
>> TreeTableView controls that gets moved unexpectedly when new items are added
>> even way below the selected items.
>>
>> A couple of tests have been added. They
Then maybe a solution would be around adding new methods like
observableKeySet(). These will need to be default methods, and the
implementation could test if keySet() already returns an ObservableSet, in
which case it returns it, and if not it wraps the Set in an
ObservableSetWrapper or something
On Thu, 19 May 2022 13:13:01 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When
Sorry, I misunderstood, I missed that the methods weren't already
defined in ObservableMap, so no existing signature is changed.
--John
On 30/05/2022 09:39, Tom Schindl wrote:
Hi,
Well the binary compat IMHO is not a problem. If your subtype
overwrites the return type of a method the
> When the size of a ListCell is changed and a scrollTo method is invoked
> without having a layout calculation in between, the old (wrong) size is used
> to calculcate the total estimate. This happens e.g. when the size is changed
> in the `updateItem` method.
> This PR will immediately resize
Hi,
Well the binary compat IMHO is not a problem. If your subtype overwrites
the return type of a method the compiler will inserts a bridge method:
Take this example
package bla;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
public class Test {
It's not binary compatible, as changing the return type results in a new
method that compiled code won't be able to find.
See also "change result type (including void)" here:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Evolving_Java-based_APIs_2#Evolving_API_interfaces_-_API_methods
--John
On 30/05/2022
Hi,
Picking up an old issue, JDK-8091393 [1], I went ahead and looked at the
work needed to implement it.
keySet() and entrySet() can both be made to return ObservableSet rather
easily. values() will probably require an ObservableCollection type.
Before discussing these details, my question is:
On Fri, 27 May 2022 16:47:04 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Fri, 27 May 2022 23:31:42 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> I reviewed the public API changes, and this looks like a great addition to
> JavaFX bindings. I think there might be time to get this into JavaFX 19,
> presuming that there are no issues with the testing or implementation, so
> let's
> This is an implementation of the proposal in
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
> good test coverage.
>
> This was based on https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/pull/434 but with a
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This
On Fri, 27 May 2022 16:47:04 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Fri, 27 May 2022 15:42:09 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Change for unregisterDomWindow function and code cleanup
>
>
On Fri, 27 May 2022 12:13:43 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Thu, 26 May 2022 17:00:46 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding space for map include
>
>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Thu, 26 May 2022 07:26:38 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Thu, 26 May 2022 07:08:59 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:57:13 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Review comments applied
>
> modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WebCore/bindings/java/EventListenerManager.cpp
On Wed, 25 May 2022 12:45:59 GMT, Ambarish Rapte wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Review comments applied
>
> modules/javafx.web/src/main/native/Source/WebCore/bindings/java/EventListenerManager.cpp
On Fri, 13 May 2022 05:34:08 GMT, Tomator wrote:
> When I used BlueJ, I found a problem with Chinese display.
> /javafx.graphics/com/sun/javafx/font/CompositeGlyphMapper.java#getGlyphCode
> may return a negative number when no font library is specified in Linux,and
> this could cause
On Tue, 24 May 2022 15:20:01 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JGObject in plave of raw jni object
>
>
On Sun, 22 May 2022 14:06:41 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Wed, 25 May 2022 10:10:08 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
I opened a bug report but they closed it by saying that they can't
reproduce.
https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8286713
They test on Windows 10, can this be the cause why they are not able to
reproduce?
Here a gist where the code is better formatted.
On Wed, 25 May 2022 10:10:08 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 00:04:00 GMT, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>> Changelog for this MarlinFX 0.9.4.5 release:
>>
>> The Marlin-renderer 0.9.4.5 release provides bug fixes on Marlin's path
>> clipper:
>> - improved Stroker to handle huge coordinates, up to 1E15
>> - improved PathClipFilter (filler)
The `valueProperty()` and `chronologyProperty()` listener are now added in the
second constructor of `DatePicker`
(`public DatePicker(LocalDate localDate)`) instead of the first one (`public
DatePicker()`).
Therefore, both listener are now added no matter which constructor is used.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 21:25:23 GMT, Marius Hanl wrote:
> This PR fixes a problem, where the layout is broken when a `(Tree)TableRow`
> has padding.
> As also mentioned in the ticket, the `layoutChildren` method in
> `TableRowSkinBase` is implemented wrong.
>
> The `layoutChildren` method is
This PR fixes a problem, where the layout is broken when a `(Tree)TableRow` has
padding.
As also mentioned in the ticket, the `layoutChildren` method in
`TableRowSkinBase` is implemented wrong.
The `layoutChildren` method is responsible for layouting all the
`(Tree)TableCells`.
When the row
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:46:40 GMT, John Hendrikx wrote:
>> This is an implementation of the proposal in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8274771 that me and Nir Lisker
>> (@nlisker) have been working on. It's a complete implementation including
>> good test coverage.
>>
>> This
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:34:25 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 1835d1f5
Author:Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/1835d1f59104136d6cb34090bd69091433ddac00
Stats: 5484
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:33:57 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7b1637f8
Author:Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/commit/7b1637f8f617639ddc0c93e15589824c6a0d71b1
Stats: 21664
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:31:58 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f89a5139
Author:Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/f89a513980c2c2637c4f3d2b80f0708fd6f9e252
Stats: 5484
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283869: Update attribution in webkit.md file
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/102/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=102=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283869
Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286256: Update libxml2 to 2.9.14
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/101/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u=101=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286256
Stats: 21664
On Tue, 24 May 2022 17:31:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Clean backport to `jfx11u`.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8504dad2
Author:Kevin Rushforth
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/commit/8504dad26ac0f0dcbf7cb62ac58642dc8a91f02e
Stats: 21664
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8283869: Update attribution in webkit.md file
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/62/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=62=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8283869
Stats:
Clean backport to `jfx17u`.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286256: Update libxml2 to 2.9.14
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx17u/pull/61/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx17u=61=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8286256
Stats: 21664 lines
On Tue, 24 May 2022 14:54:19 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JGObject in plave of raw jni object
>
>
On Sun, 22 May 2022 14:06:41 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
On Mon, 23 May 2022 20:44:47 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> When the size of a ListCell is changed and a scrollTo method is invoked
>> without having a layout calculation in between, the old (wrong) size is used
>> to calculcate the total estimate. This happens e.g. when the size is changed
>> in
On Thu, 5 May 2022 16:21:45 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR fixes an issue with selection of multiple items in TableView and
> TreeTableView controls that gets moved unexpectedly when new items are added
> even way below the selected items.
>
> A couple of tests have been added. They fail
> This PR fixes an issue with selection of multiple items in TableView and
> TreeTableView controls that gets moved unexpectedly when new items are added
> even way below the selected items.
>
> A couple of tests have been added. They fail without this PR (first selected
> item gets
On Mon, 23 May 2022 20:44:47 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> When the size of a ListCell is changed and a scrollTo method is invoked
>> without having a layout calculation in between, the old (wrong) size is used
>> to calculcate the total estimate. This happens e.g. when the size is changed
>> in
> When the size of a ListCell is changed and a scrollTo method is invoked
> without having a layout calculation in between, the old (wrong) size is used
> to calculcate the total estimate. This happens e.g. when the size is changed
> in the `updateItem` method.
> This PR will immediately resize
On Tue, 17 May 2022 12:32:17 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured for
> windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>
> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows ,
>
On Wed, 18 May 2022 13:39:12 GMT, Hima Bindu Meda wrote:
>> Updated libxml to version 2.9.14.As mentioned in UPDATING.txt, configured
>> for windows , linux and Mac platforms and updated the files accordingly.
>>
>> Updated libxslt to version 1.1.35. Generated the config.h files for windows
Hi,
After further investigation, I think there's a bug that font-family is not
working (defining a font family name).
Because regardless of the font-family I use, the font name within the font
is used.
It's openjfx 17.0.2
-- Thiago.
Em sex., 20 de mai. de 2022 às 18:06, Thiago Milczarek Sayão
On Fri, 6 May 2022 10:16:41 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR extends the check if a treeItem is expanded to all its ancestors, as
> in case one ancestor is collapsed, all its children will be hidden.
>
> 4 tests are included, two for TreeView and two for TreeTableView.
This pull request has
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:45:00 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Platform.exit() , removing code block, as it is causing other test fail
>
>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 21:34:54 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Platform.exit() , removing code block, as it is causing other test fail
>
>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
Hi,
I want to have one font that is "regular" and a variation of the same font
as "bold", used when specified "-fx-font-weight: bold".
@font-face {
font-family: 'Gotham Condensed';
src: url('../fonts/GothamCondensed-Book.otf');
}
@font-face {
font-family: 'Gotham Condensed Bold';
On Fri, 6 May 2022 10:16:41 GMT, Jose Pereda wrote:
> This PR extends the check if a treeItem is expanded to all its ancestors, as
> in case one ancestor is collapsed, all its children will be hidden.
>
> 4 tests are included, two for TreeView and two for TreeTableView.
This looks good to me.
On Thu, 19 May 2022 22:01:31 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Platform.exit() , removing code block, as it is causing other test fail
>
>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:38:20 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger
wrote:
> Separate test class added for TreeTableView case.
> Fix is analogous to JDK-8251480.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 18b2366f
Author:Robert Lichtenberger
Committer: Ajit Ghaisas
URL:
On Tue, 10 May 2022 12:56:53 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao
wrote:
>> When there's an APPLICATION_MODAL window, all other windows are disabled and
>> re-enabled when the APPLICATION_MODAL window closes. This causes
>> `requestToFront()` to be called on every window, and it does not guarantee
>>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 15:57:46 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
>> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
>> Issue
>> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>>
>> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
>>
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its
On Thu, 19 May 2022 15:22:08 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Jay Bhaskar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Platform.exit() , removing code block, as it is causing other test fail
>
>
On Thu, 19 May 2022 13:13:01 GMT, Jay Bhaskar wrote:
> This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
> Issue
> [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
>
> 1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
> 2. When
On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:23:55 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger
wrote:
>> Separate test class added for TreeTableView case.
>> Fix is analogous to JDK-8251480.
>
> Robert Lichtenberger has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8285197:
On Thu, 19 May 2022 14:23:55 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger
wrote:
>> Separate test class added for TreeTableView case.
>> Fix is analogous to JDK-8251480.
>
> Robert Lichtenberger has updated the pull request incrementally with two
> additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - 8285197:
On Thu, 12 May 2022 05:22:38 GMT, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
>> Robert Lichtenberger has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - 8285197: TableColumnHeader: calc of cell width must respect row styling
>> (TreeTableView)
>>
>>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:38:20 GMT, Robert Lichtenberger
wrote:
> Separate test class added for TreeTableView case.
> Fix is analogous to JDK-8251480.
Finally found the time to cleanup the test class...
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/779
> Separate test class added for TreeTableView case.
> Fix is analogous to JDK-8251480.
Robert Lichtenberger has updated the pull request incrementally with two
additional commits since the last revision:
- 8285197: TableColumnHeader: calc of cell width must respect row styling
(TreeTableView)
This PR is new implementation of JavaEvent listener memory management.
Issue [JDK-8088420](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8088420?filter=-1)
1. Calling remove event listener does not free jni global references.
2. When WebView goes out of scope (disposed from app) , its Event Listeners
On Thu, 19 May 2022 12:44:44 GMT, Paweł Kruszczyński
wrote:
> `Stage` minimalizing (iconified state) cannot be disabled for the user. The
> same for `Stage` closable state.
> PR adds these features without breaking backward compatibility.
Marking this as "Draft" since it is not ready for
On Thu, 19 May 2022 12:44:44 GMT, Paweł Kruszczyński
wrote:
> `Stage` minimalizing (iconified state) cannot be disabled for the user. The
> same for `Stage` closable state.
> PR adds these features without breaking backward compatibility.
@xardif It is premature to review this PR. Please read
`Stage` minimalizing (iconified state) cannot be disabled for the user. The
same for `Stage` closable state.
PR adds these features without breaking backward compatibility.
-
Commit messages:
- 8090522: Allow support for disabling stage iconification (minimization)
Changes:
1 - 100 of 23132 matches
Mail list logo
