Hi Tom! As a programmer I use SB for prototyping. I think the problem is,
that designers really need a visual UI and CSS editor.
Upcoming web-standards like Web Components and frameworks like Google
Polymer really shine, when it comes to connection between programmers and
designers.
--Benjamin
My two cents would be that maintaining a UI builder is an awful lot of work, while I expect that a
lot of programmers won't be using SB because it always has limitations. Either with complex layouts
or custom controls. Real programmers probably use FXML directly or even just code it in
Java.
Looks like Gluon is the Trolltech equivalent I just wished
for - that was fast :-)
I had a similar thought. Honestly this reminds me a bit more to JGoodies
and the tools around it, but with a lot more. Looks good. Hope that Gluon
takes the mobile ports for JavaFX and SceneBuilder to the next
But what about Xcode GUI design? Android Studio GUI designer? QT Designer? …
Am 05.03.2015 um 09:19 schrieb Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org:
My two cents would be that maintaining a UI builder is an awful lot of work,
while I expect that a lot of programmers won't be using SB because it always
And then there are GroovyFX and ScalaFX, which embed the declarative
UI language in the host language. To me, FXML seems to be just
compensation for the lack of expressiveness in Java.
Tomas
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Doug Schaefer dschae...@qnx.com wrote:
GUI builders are great for
GUI builders are great for prototyping or helping you learn. But when the
application gets complex I keep hearing developers throw them out. They
start getting in the way.
I think if you have a good API and a good declarative UI language, think
QML not FXML, then you may find you don¹t really
Hi Kevin,
Scene Builder source code is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40.
I'm a bit confused what this means.
People who want to use Scene Builder are expected to compile it themselves
from now on? Does
Hi Emmanuel,
jfx8u40/WebView (libjfxwebkit.so) doesn't link with icu lib, however it has that option and so it
contains all the related headers which it nevertheless uses during the build process.
UChar32 was defined as unsigned in older icu versions and it is still that in the
binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40.
I'm a bit confused what this means.
People who want to use Scene Builder are expected to compile it themselves
from now on? Does that really make sense? Presumably the idea here is that
SB will be integrated into IDEs and will no longer have
,
Scene Builder source code is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40.
I'm a bit confused what this means.
People who want to use Scene Builder are expected to compile it themselves
from now on? Does
Hey Jonathan,
If you let us know who does make these decisions, we will happily repeat
our questions to them :) Mark Reinhold perhaps?
I mean, I appreciate that GUI libraries are probably not a prime driver of
sales for Oracle, but as an enterprise focused company I assume management
understands
2349 Unresolved Bugs seems buggy to me:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/issues/?jql=issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved
Any software project always has lots of unresolved issues in the issue
tracker, though, especially something as large as a UI toolkit. Qt has
about
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
WRT 8u60+9, I read that 8u60 is going to be a bug fix only release with no
new features at all. I don't know how to read that, as JavaFX does not seem
especially buggy to me,
2349 Unresolved Bugs seems buggy to me:
This is what we did at Gluon (http://gluonhq.com), and the result can be
downloaded at http://gluonhq.com/products/downloads/
Thanks Johan! Looks like Gluon is the Trolltech equivalent I just wished
for - that was fast :-)
From your blog post, it sounds like you're planning to fork SB or at
is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40.
I'm a bit confused what this means.
People who want to use Scene Builder are expected to compile it
themselves
from now on? Does that really make sense? Presumably the idea
Scene Builder source code is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40. See:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/sb2download-216.html
-- Kevin
ngalarn...@abinitio.com wrote:
Hurray!
Thank you
Anton Tarasov or Andrew Brygin might be able to provide an answer for
you, although our effort recently has been focused on getting the
updated C++11-based WebKit to build.
-- Kevin
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi Kevin,
I'm updating the OpenJFX package in Debian to the version 8u40-b25
and I get
...@oracle.com
To: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net,
Date: 03/03/2015 05:14 PM
Subject:8u40 is released
Sent by:openjfx-dev openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net
For those who haven't seen yet, the JDK 8u40 release is now live and
ready for download
For those who haven't seen yet, the JDK 8u40 release is now live and
ready for download.
-- Kevin
19 matches
Mail list logo
