ins; 0 del; 1 mod
8264536: Building OpenJFX on Apple AARCH64 not possible
Backport-of: eec2f394dc81b9a1f9da6cc97ddc0cc39c6e62c5
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/18
Reviewed-by: kcr
-
Commit messages:
- 8264536: Building OpenJFX on Apple AARCH64 not possible
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx11u/pull/18/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx11u&pr=18&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:21:20 GMT, Tor (torbuntu)
wrote:
> For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle to
> stop ignoring it.
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/465
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/commit/fab638ae
Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
8265425: Hard failure when building OpenJFX for Linux AArch64
Reviewed-by: jvos, kcr
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/465
can be sorted, I'm
+1 on this.
I created an issue for this: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265425
@Torbuntu if you manage to get the OCA done, you can change the title of this
PR to 8265425: Hard failure when building OpenJFX for Linux AArch64
-
Marked as revie
For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle to
stop ignoring it.
-
Commit messages:
- Add aarch64 support to linux
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/465/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx&pr=465&range=00
Issue: ht
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:35:43 GMT, Tor (torbuntu)
wrote:
>> For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle
>> to stop ignoring it.
>
> I've sent the email with an attached signed PDF for the OCA. I also
> apparently did not have my github account on my Oracle account
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:21:20 GMT, Tor (torbuntu)
wrote:
> For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle to
> stop ignoring it.
Hi,
Alternatively, you can fill out the form at
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oca-405177.pdf out, and send an e-mail with
the scan
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:21:20 GMT, Tor (torbuntu)
wrote:
> For building on aarch64 linux systems we need it added to the buuld.gradle to
> stop ignoring it.
I can't seem to sign the OCA because the page is stuck in some weird loop with
a connection error. Is there any other way to do this?
I'
e in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
8264536: Building OpenJFX on Apple AARCH64 not possible
Reviewed-by: kcr
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/451
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:54:49 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
> don't bail when building on Apple M1 systems
> Fix for JDK-8264536
Looks good.
-
Marked as reviewed by kcr (Lead).
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/451
don't bail when building on Apple M1 systems
Fix for JDK-8264536
-
Commit messages:
- don't bail when building on Apple M1 systems
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/451/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jfx&pr=451&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openj
] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255713
On 3/19/2021 8:11 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
Did you go through
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX? Where what
error do you get at which step?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:12 PM Jacky Guo wrote:
Hi there,
I've cloned Op
Did you go through
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX? Where what
error do you get at which step?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:12 PM Jacky Guo wrote:
> Hi there,
> I've cloned OpenJFX locally, but I can't build it, because I need to define
> the e
Hi there,
I've cloned OpenJFX locally, but I can't build it, because I need to define
the environment variable WINSDK_DIR. What do I need to set this to and what
do I need to put in that folder
Thanks!
- Jacky Guo
P.S. I only have Windows on a laptop, so I don't know how I can test for
Linux and/
Added at
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-CentOS8
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:28 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> This looks fine to me. A couple of them might not be needed (PowerTools?
> epel-release? libXtst-devel? (although that probably pulls
This looks fine to me. A couple of them might not be needed (PowerTools?
epel-release? libXtst-devel? (although that probably pulls in the needed
libX11 developer package)), but it seems a good list.
-- Kevin
On 10/19/2019 9:11 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
Thanks Michael.
Kevin, if these are appro
Thanks Michael.
Kevin, if these are approved I can add them to the build instructions page.
- Nir
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 7:07 PM Michael Franz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to report that I was able to get OpenJFX development setup on CentOS 8
> using the following steps:
> 0. sudo yum update
> 1. su
Hi,
Just to report that I was able to get OpenJFX development setup on CentOS 8
using the following steps:
0. sudo yum update
1. sudo yum install git bison flex pkgconfig gtk2-devel gtk3-devel
pango-devel freetype-devel libXtst-devel java-11-openjdk-devel ant gcc-c++
2. sudo yum install epel-relea
Kevin,
I updated my gcc to 8.2.0 using the steps here
https://medium.com/@bipul.k.kuri/install-latest-gcc-on-centos-linux-release-7-6-a704a11d943d
and was able to successfully build and run all the tests.
thank you for the specific version, I will probably do the same exercise on
CentOS 8
Michae
Yeah, this would be helpful. I'm pretty sure we've had requests for
checking other dependencies (like missing packages, etc). Failing fast
with an explicit error message is almost always better than wasting time
tracking down strange build failures.
-- Kevin
On 10/17/2019 7:23 AM, Johan Vos
I heard similar reports from developers trying to build with gcc 4.x.
We might benefit from an assert early in the build.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:16 PM Kevin Rushforth
wrote:
> The current toolchain for building JavaFX is gcc 8.2. As long as you
> don't build WebKit, it will still build with g
The current toolchain for building JavaFX is gcc 8.2. As long as you
don't build WebKit, it will still build with gcc 5.4.
I just tried it on an Oracle Linux 7 machine with gcc 4.9.1 (which is
what we used to use a couple years ago), and the build fails for me with
the same error. Looks like y
Hi,
I did a clean install of CentOS 7, updated, added the necessary tools and
then cloned the repo and ran the default build. I get the following errors:
/home/test00/Source/jfx/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/glass_general.cpp:598:1:
error: unused parameter ‘event’ [-Werror=unu
with a
>> fixed setup. It would be better of course to move more of the environment
>> and context parameters to the build procedure itself, and your script
>> seems
>> a step in that direction. But what infrastructure do you use to run this?
>>
>> - Johan
>&
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 11:17 PM Michael Ennen
> wrote:
>
> > Also don't forget about the Windows build script:
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/develop/tools/scripts/build.ps1
> >
> > It is what I use to automate th
scripts/build.ps1
>
> It is what I use to automate the process of building OpenJFX on Windows as
> much as
> possible. Any improvements to the script would be appreciated.
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:03 AM wrote:
>
> > forgot the link to the instruction page, just
Also don't forget about the Windows build script:
https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/blob/develop/tools/scripts/build.ps1
It is what I use to automate the process of building OpenJFX on Windows as
much as
possible. Any improvements to the script would be appreciated.
On Wed, O
Cc: [email protected] Mailing
Subject: Re: Problems building openjfx
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:34 PM Nir Lisker mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have
instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 inst
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:34 PM Nir Lisker wrote:
> I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have
>> instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 instructions on the wiki
>> should
>> be working for everyone who wants to build 11.
>
>
> There are instructions for 8 on the
>
> I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you have
> instructions for 8 on your site. But the 11 instructions on the wiki should
> be working for everyone who wants to build 11.
There are instructions for 8 on the wiki too, though I don't know if they
are correct.
As for
Your site says these are for 8, but I assume it is very similar to 11? If
so, we should probably update the wiki with the instructions on your site.
Are there any particular parts of the wiki where you think corrections are
needed?
I think we should focus on 11 on the wiki, so it's really good you
Make it so. :)
-- Kevin
On 10/31/2018 8:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:
yes, I think so - don't have it and nothing barked at me
Zitat von Nir Lisker :
Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was
already
verified that it's not needed.
- Nir
On Wed, Oct 31, 201
yes, I think so - don't have it and nothing barked at me
Zitat von Nir Lisker :
Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was already
verified that it's not needed.
- Nir
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:59 PM wrote:
wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because it
I've been pulling the latest and building successfully on Windows for the
past week. Here's a supplement to the official docs.
https://courses.bekwam.net/public_tutorials/bkcourse_building_openjfx_8_win.
html
-Carl
Can I remove the step for "DirectX SDK June 2010"? I think it was already
verified that it's not needed.
- Nir
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:59 PM wrote:
>
> wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because it took ages
> to test the webkit (which wasn't build so all its tests ran until eac
wasn't as bad as expected, just had to interrupt because it took ages
to test the webkit (which wasn't build so all its tests ran until each
timed out)
Task :web:test
*
WARNING: running web tests without building webkit.
The webkit nati
other:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-EnvironmentVariables Zitat von
[email protected]:
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at:
that is having downloaded, installed the required tools, added
env vars as desribed.
Then in cy
empire.de wrote:
forgot the link to the instruction page, just in case there's another:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-EnvironmentVariables Zitat von
[email protected]:
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at:
that is ha
ki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-EnvironmentVariables
Zitat von [email protected]:
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at:
that is having downloaded, installed the required tools, added env
vars as desribed.
Then in cygwin, navigate to
forgot the link to the instruction page, just in case there's another:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-EnvironmentVariables
Zitat von [email protected]:
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at:
that is having downl
first try, following the instructions (for win10) at:
that is having downloaded, installed the required tools, added env
vars as desribed.
Then in cygwin, navigate to the git working dir, typing
gradle tasks
fails with:
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* Where:
Script
'C:\Date
So making gradlew optional seems best then, if added.
-- Kevin
Mario Torre wrote:
2017-12-19 23:04 GMT+01:00 Scott Palmer :
The project should be configured to use the Gradle Wrapper, so the correct
version of Gradle is used automatically.
This is not an option for Linux distributi
hrieb Phil Race:
In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle to
getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today
?
- Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
- Tool-chain co
ust building it.
So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
- Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
- Tool-chain configuration problems - platform-specific or otherwise ?
- Needing to do a JDK build as well (JDK 9 and later) ?
- Something else ?
And having ident
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Mario Torre
> wrote:
>
> 2017-12-19 23:04 GMT+01:00 Scott Palmer :
>> The project should be configured to use the Gradle Wrapper, so the correct
>> version of Gradle is used automatically.
>
> This is not an option for Linux distributions and is not an option f
Gradle is also an
issue, since we try to use a stable toolchain on those OSes.
Cheers,
Mario
2017-12-19 21:11 GMT+01:00 Phil Race :
In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle to
getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
So wh
that one obstacle to
> getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
>
> So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
>
>
> - Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
> - Tool-chain configuration problems - platform-specific or other
2017-12-19 23:04 GMT+01:00 Scott Palmer :
> The project should be configured to use the Gradle Wrapper, so the correct
> version of Gradle is used automatically.
This is not an option for Linux distributions and is not an option for
many people using them. We need to be able to produce a build wi
gt;>
>>> In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle to
>>> getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
>>>
>>> So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
>>>
>
To be honest, building OpenJFX is the least of my worries. Compared with
other frameworks, building OpenJFX is extremely easy and well-documented.
The wiki pages are still mostly accurate.
I agree with Mario about the webkit: that is the biggest pain imho. The
fact that a bunch of code is dropped
getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
- Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
- Tool-chain configuration problems - platform-specific or otherwise ?
- Needing to do a JDK build as well (JDK 9 and
1 GMT+01:00 Phil Race :
> In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle to
> getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
>
> So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
>
> - Insufficient or out-
ilding it.
>
> So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
>
> - Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
> - Tool-chain configuration problems - platform-specific or otherwise ?
> - Needing to do a JDK build as well (JDK 9 and later) ?
> - Something e
In the "innovation" email thread it was suggested that one obstacle to
getting involved and contributing to OpenJFX is just building it.
So what are the top one or two pain points with building OpenJFX today ?
- Insufficient or out-dated build docs ?
- Tool-chain configuratio
.
-- Kevin
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
I've some trouble building OpenJFX 9 with OpenJDK 9+181 and Gradle 3.2.1
on Debian. I get the following compilation errors:
/home/ebourg/openjfx9/modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/binding/SelectBinding.java:47:
error: package sun.uti
use the Oracle JDK 9 build as the boot JDK.
-- Kevin
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Hi,
I've some trouble building OpenJFX 9 with OpenJDK 9+181 and Gradle 3.2.1
on Debian. I get the following compilation errors:
/home/ebourg/openjfx9/modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/bi
Hi,
I've some trouble building OpenJFX 9 with OpenJDK 9+181 and Gradle 3.2.1
on Debian. I get the following compilation errors:
/home/ebourg/openjfx9/modules/javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/binding/SelectBinding.java:47:
error: package sun.util.logging is not visible
i
I just reworked:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
to show the current 9-dev reality of a modular build.
--
David Hill
Java Embedded Development
"A man's feet should be planted in his country, but his eyes should survey the
world."
-- George
OpenJFX for the first time
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
Dave Hill updated it recently, so it is reasonably current.
And he is always interested in suggestions/clarifications and kudos :-)
Seriously - I have several environments (virtual boxes) that I try the
Thanks Kevin - that looks very helpful.
-Original Message-
From: openjfx-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Kevin Rushforth
Sent: Saturday, 18 June 2016 05:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Building OpenJFX for the first time
https
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
Dave Hill updated it recently, so it is reasonably current.
-- Kevin
John C. Turnbull wrote:
I would like to set up a development environment for the OpenJFX project but
have never attempted this before.
I am very familiar
I would like to set up a development environment for the OpenJFX project but
have never attempted this before.
I am very familiar with all 3 major Java IDEs with my preference (in order
of most favourite to least favourite) is Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans (so
whichever one is "best" doesn't real
Yes, unless we do it via reflection, which we have done in similar
situations. If it's only the one method call then we might do that, and
file a bug to remove the reflection later. Otherwise we will just wait
until we switch to using JDK 9 as the boot JDK (and this could
accelerate that).
--
Seems fixing it in openjfx/9-dev (switch to reset() method from remove..)
will enforce usage of JDK9 ...
Thanks
-Sven
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Kevin Rushforth <
[email protected]> wrote:
> You got the correct commit. I even dug up the e-mail thread where I raised
> this as a c
You got the correct commit. I even dug up the e-mail thread where I
raised this as a concern.
-- Kevin, feeling rather embarrassed to have completely let this one slip...
Sven Reimers wrote:
Thanks... seems it is broken for some time already, if I got the
correct commit...
It was my own loc
I just looked, and saw that this was discussed on the awt-dev mailing
list about 4 or 5 months ago when JDK-8074763 was reviewed. I even
raised this as a concern, but then promptly forgot about it.
I just filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134709 to track this.
Thank you for repor
Thanks... seems it is broken for some time already, if I got the correct
commit...
It was my own local jdk build - I wanted to build openjdk from source and
then openjfx on top of that to work around this issue..
Falling back to use a stripped down jdk8 now.. (building JDK 8 on a Mac
with a newer
I just tried it -- it's a real failure, which is odd since I thought I
had built with JDK 9 more recently than that. I will file a bug.
-- Kevin
Kevin Rushforth wrote:
We still use JDK 8u40 as our boot JDK for building FX 9-dev, but it
should work against JDK 9-dev as well.
Did you remember
We still use JDK 8u40 as our boot JDK for building FX 9-dev, but it
should work against JDK 9-dev as well.
Did you remember to remove jfxrt.jar from your JDK 9? The build.gradle
script doesn't know to look for it in $JDK_HOME/lib and warn you if you
forget -- it only looks in $JDK_HOME/jre/lib
Hi,
I get the following error trying to compile latest 9-dev from openjfx
against latest jdk9:
:swing:compileJava
[ant:javac]
/Users/sven/oss/openjfx/9-dev/modules/swing/src/main/java/javafx/embed/swing/FXDnD.java:480:
error: cannot find symbol
[ant:javac] if (ctx != null) ctx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone!
I'm trying to build OpenJFX (8u60) on openSUSE 13.2 and got the
following for the SDK task:
[...]
Internal error. Missing resources
[/resources/web-files/javafx-loading-100x100.gif]
com.sun.javafx.tools.packager.PackagerException: E
thank you, I followed your advice
one exception was that I had to perform
export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -fPIC"
export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC"
./configure --enable-static --enable-shared
instead of the "./configure --enable-static"
for successful build of openjfx itself, I also had to copy around som
Hi Ondra,
On 19.06.2015 21:19, Ondra Pelech wrote:
lowering the version of webview-deps 1.3 --> 1.2 seems to be a step forward!
but now I have another problem
as you mentioned, there's this dependency on *.a static ICU libraries
(why? why not depend on *.so?)
in Fedora 20 there are only availab
Hello Ondra,
please see my comment inline.
On 6/19/2015 9:19 PM, Ondra Pelech wrote:
lowering the version of webview-deps 1.3 --> 1.2 seems to be a step forward!
but now I have another problem
as you mentioned, there's this dependency on *.a static ICU libraries
(why? why not depend on *.so?)
lowering the version of webview-deps 1.3 --> 1.2 seems to be a step forward!
but now I have another problem
as you mentioned, there's this dependency on *.a static ICU libraries
(why? why not depend on *.so?)
in Fedora 20 there are only available dynamic *.so libraries (packages
libicu and libicu-
Hi Hruda,
On Windows you won't be able to build it with webview-deps 1.2 as you need ICU
built for static linking.
We're going to resume the activity of pushing the proper deps to Maven Central in the nearest time.
Sorry for the incovinence.
Anton.
On 18.06.2015 22:05, Hruda, Steve wrote:
H
Hi Ondra, Michael,
On 16.06.2015 18:04, Michael Hoffer wrote:
Hi Ondra,
I was able to build WebKit after reverting the version number from 1.3 to
1.2. On Linux there should be a package called libicu48. I guess it is
equivalent to webview-deps 1.3. If you install it WebKit should compile.
web
Hi,
I tried to build the JFX’s Webkit version by using Michael’s mentioned
workaround on windows, but I wasn’t successful.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2015-June/017424.html
Is there another workaround?
…Or can anyone send me the needed file so that I can temporary add it
Hi Ondra,
I was able to build WebKit after reverting the version number from 1.3 to
1.2. On Linux there should be a package called libicu48. I guess it is
equivalent to webview-deps 1.3. If you install it WebKit should compile.
Regards,
Michael
2015-06-15 1:02 GMT+02:00 Ondra Pelech :
> Hello,
Hello,
I'm trying to build OpenJFX with WebKit, but I'm missing the
dependency com.sun.webkit:webview-deps:1.3
I've come across this thread from May
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.openjfx.devel/9447
but webkit:webview-deps:1.3 is still not on maven central
is there another place
Hello Alexander,
It looks like that you have GCC version < 4.6 and it lacks diagnostics
push/pop functionality[1]
that we are using to suppress deprecation warnings. We have moved to gcc
4.8 on Linux recently[2].
So the fix is to upgrade GCC to at least 4.6. Or as a workaround you may
apply
I am trying to build openjfx from sources - centos 6.4. 64 openjdk8 (build
25.60-b11, mixed mode), I run
/gradle-1.8/bin/gradle --info --debug
and this is what I get:
10:11:09.184 [ERROR] [system.err] cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
10:11:09.186 [ERROR] [system.err]
/home/PE/Temp/rt
Does any of this output give any indication as to what's going on? Ive
tried various combinations of the params for dispman.display and
dispman.layer but still don't see any sign of activity on the TFT screen.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Nick Pratt wrote:
> This is the output from my Pi w
This is the output from my Pi with the modified JDK:
pi@raspberrypi ~ $ sudo /opt/java/jre/bin/java -Djavafx.platform=monocle
-Dmonocle.screen.fb="/dev/fb1" -Ddispman.display=0 -Ddispman.layer=1
-Dprism.verbose=true -Djavafx.verbose=true -jar JavaFXApp.jar
Prism pipeline init order: es2 sw
Using
On 12/31/14, 9:45 PM, Nick Pratt wrote:
Thanks for the help. So now I can invoke Java without the link errors, but my
JavaFX app isnt appearing on the attached TFT screen ( Note: I can get 'x' to
appear on the the Pi TFT screen by setting the FRAMEBUFFER variable prior to
invoking startx so I
On 1/1/15, 12:18 PM, Jens Kapitza wrote:
Am 30.12.2014 um 14:16 schrieb Nick Pratt:
Ok, I setup a fresh Ubuntu 12.0.4 server install on a VM (32 bit this time),
installed Gradle 1.8, Oracle JDK 1.8u25 (x86 version, removed the existing
jfxrt.jar), grabbed all the latest OpenJFX source and Pi/
Am 30.12.2014 um 14:16 schrieb Nick Pratt:
Ok, I setup a fresh Ubuntu 12.0.4 server install on a VM (32 bit this
time), installed Gradle 1.8, Oracle JDK 1.8u25 (x86 version, removed
the existing jfxrt.jar), grabbed all the latest OpenJFX source and
Pi/Arm tool chain and rebuilt. I copied the
Am 30.12.2014 um 13:37 schrieb Nick Pratt:
Thanks - Do I have to use OpenJDK or will the latest Oracle JDK (8u25
at time of writing) work?
I've read that Oracle (for ARM 8u6 - as far as i can remember)
not work without removing jfxrt.jar file. i would use OpenJDK
there are ubuntu or debian
Thanks for the help. So now I can invoke Java without the link errors, but
my JavaFX app isnt appearing on the attached TFT screen ( Note: I can get
'x' to appear on the the Pi TFT screen by setting the FRAMEBUFFER variable
prior to invoking startx so I know my TFT screen is setup and the right
Ke
Nick found a good one, took me a while to find the obvious :-p
The UnsatisfiedLinkError was caused by old ARM JFX jars that were not overriden
when he copied the new bits into the JDK.
On ARM we have a split set of jars for FX that we ship, but when we build, we
only build the single jfxrt.ja
Ok, I setup a fresh Ubuntu 12.0.4 server install on a VM (32 bit this
time), installed Gradle 1.8, Oracle JDK 1.8u25 (x86 version, removed the
existing jfxrt.jar), grabbed all the latest OpenJFX source and Pi/Arm tool
chain and rebuilt. I copied the resulting contents of
./rt/build/armv6hf-sdk/rt
Thanks - Do I have to use OpenJDK or will the latest Oracle JDK (8u25 at
time of writing) work?
Nick
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Jens Kapitza wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> i've read you found a solution, i had the same Problem (linux.grandle)
>
> in build folder there were some empty build files.
Hi Nick,
i've read you found a solution, i had the same Problem (linux.grandle)
in build folder there were some empty build files. as far as i can
remember linux_tools
the script tries to find cflags and linker options but there is an empty
file (i've just deleted this file, clean rebuild
So I made some progress here:
I had installed Ubuntu 14.x 64-bit version. Once I installed the ia32-libs
(replacement versions for Ubuntu 14 since ia32-libs) isnt available
anymore, I got the ARM HF to build. I installed on my Pi, but Im getting
link errors when I try and run a JFX program:
jav
What JDK are you using? That looks like an older version of the String class.
Gradle 1.8 is recommended.
--mm
> On Dec 28, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Nick Pratt wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any tips on getting Openjfx (latest source as of
> 2014-12-28 19:00 EST) to build on a Centos 6.6 box?
>
>
Does anyone have any tips on getting Openjfx (latest source as of
2014-12-28 19:00 EST) to build on a Centos 6.6 box?
Im following the wiki for Linux builds and grabbed Gradle 1.8 (does the
latest 2.2 work?) but Im failing to build with the following error:
[work@nyprod1 rt]# /opt/gradle/bin/grad
/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX#BuildingOpenJFX-LinuxARM
They should be up to date.
-- Kevin
Ladislav Török wrote:
Can I build OpenJFX for Linux ARM on VirtualBox, guest OS is Ubuntu 12.10?
I want build OpenJFX from the latest JavaFX 8u40 repo.
Can I build OpenJFX for Linux ARM on VirtualBox, guest OS is Ubuntu 12.10?
I want build OpenJFX from the latest JavaFX 8u40 repo.
the wiki. Will do that Monday. Gotta go now.
>
> Steve
>
> On 2014-04-04 5:31 PM, Philipp Dörfler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just out of curiousity I wanted to build OpenJFX, but although I followed
>> the instructions at
>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.ne
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
