This is unplanned for JDK 9. We will consider doing it for JDK 10.
-- Kevin
Florian Brunner wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the update.
Back in 2012 there was the following statement from Oracle:
"Oracle intends to standardize relevant parts of JavaFX through the JCP in the
Java SE 9 time fram
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the update.
Back in 2012 there was the following statement from Oracle:
"Oracle intends to standardize relevant parts of JavaFX through the JCP in the
Java SE 9 time frame."
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/1854982
What about this plan?
-Florian
Am Samstag, 27.
Hard to say whether a public equivalent of NGExternalNode would be
feasible in the JDK 9 time frame. It depends on how much work would be
to expose what you would need in a way that would be robust. It isn't
something we plan for JDK 9, but I haven't given it enough thought to
know what would b
Hi all,
I agree that we need WebGL support in JavaFX. Recently, I made some
experiments with integrating the Qt based WebView/WebEngine into JavaFX via
synchronized shared memory buffers (see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlIrY1SlNM4 and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQXG77O2MqQ).
what can i
> On Jun 30, 2015, at 7:21 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
>
> ...
> With respect to things like "support WebRTC" or "support WebGL" -
> seriously? WebRTC is useful for exactly one kind of app, video chat. It
> seems to have been driven primarily so Google could make a Skype competitor
> inside Gmail with
Mike, I believe it is essential that the JavaFX WebView supports WebGL as
this is where a lot of the OpenGL work is being done now. At the moment,
JavaFX WebView is limited to Lite Mode of Google Maps for example so it is
not really compatible with an external browser. Other than that, there has
I suppose i should stop shouting from the sidelines, roll up my sleeves and get
my hands dirty, what can i do as a lowly developer to help?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 12:16, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
> Well, we are all at the whim of Oracle executives decisions with the added
> he
Be fair, chaps. WebGL is not exactly accessible.
Desktop Linux is an extremely niche platform. JFX is open source. If
someone wants accessibility support on Linux, they can certainly contribute
patches to implement it.
The JDK9 plan looks OK to me. It doesn't sound exciting but "support
Jigsaw" a
That should of read 'set its aspirations higher'
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 12:13, Jack Moxley wrote:
>
> Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the advent
> of unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Well, we are all at the whim of Oracle executives decisions with the added help
of third parties such as Gluon and RoboVM. The future of JavaFX really is in
*our* hands.
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 21:13, Jack Moxley wrote:
>
> Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the ad
Maybe it should its aspirations a little higher, especially with the advent of
unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that do.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
> JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway
>
>
>> On 30 J
JavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike wrote:
>
> write once, run anywhere
>
> This about sums it up!
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley wrote:
>>
>> write once, run anywhere
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
On 29 Ju
write once, run anywhere
This about sums it up!
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jack Moxley wrote:
> write once, run anywhere
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Does it mean platfor
To be fair Jack, WORA is/was used in reference to the Java language itself;
not JavaFX.
Felix
On 30 June 2015 at 17:12, Jack Moxley wrote:
> write once, run anywhere
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Has
write once, run anywhere
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michał Zegan wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or
> at all?
> I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does it mean platform support for linux won't be implemented now, or
at all?
I usually use windows, but still depend on that support because I
sometimes use linux, so I am interested about that.
W dniu 2015-06-29 o 22:40, Kevin Rushforth pisze:
> Ther
There is public API in 8u40 to support accessibility. Applications using
standard JavaFX controls can, for example, use the accessibleText
property to define the text that the screen reader will speak or the
accessibleHelp property to provide a more detailed description. These
properties have r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I saw it, and it seems promising, but: first, there is probably, or I
heard it wrong? no public api for making accessibility related stuff...
Also, I believe there is no linux accessibility bridge as opposed to
windows and mac. And I do not know if I a
JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered in JDK 8u40.
-- Kevin
Michał Zegan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about accessibility work? Work on it has been started, but not
sure if it is still targetted for 9.
W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze
I have no direct knowledge of anything Oracle, but based on recent press releases Oracle
has put "the cloud" up front and center. So I'm betting a lot of resources will
go into that, and a lot of projects not in line with that goal will be reduced to
maintenance mode. Personally I see the reduc
I thought you knew. Your spending a lot of time researching information
about your upcoming blog post so I thought that was part of your common
knowledge.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> Why are you asking me?
>
> On 28 June 2015 at 05:24, Mike wrote:
>
>> Felix how ma
Why are you asking me?
On 28 June 2015 at 05:24, Mike wrote:
> Felix how many full time Engineers does Oracle have on Javafx and Java?
> How does this break up? How many open source contributors are Committing
> often?
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Felix Bembrick > wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ke
Felix how many full time Engineers does Oracle have on Javafx and Java? How
does this break up? How many open source contributors are Committing often?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> Thanks Kevin but I am left a little underwhelmed by this tiny list. It
> seems that Ja
Thanks Kevin but I am left a little underwhelmed by this tiny list. It seems
that JavaFX is perhaps the slowest evolving technology in history in many
respects which is very disappointing.
> On 28 Jun 2015, at 01:07, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
> Hi Felix,
>
> Sorry for the delay. Most of us we
I have to say that I agree with Mike that WebGL support is an absolute must
especially when you consider how rudimentary the current JavaFX 3D features are.
> On 28 Jun 2015, at 04:16, Mike wrote:
>
> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building something in Javafx (like
> Scene Builder) th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What about accessibility work? Work on it has been started, but not
sure if it is still targetted for 9.
W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze:
> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building something in Javafx
> (like Scene Builder) that Proves We
a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building something in Javafx (like
Scene Builder) that Proves Webrtc support would be awesome. Ditto to Webgl
support.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty focused on 8u60,
Hi Felix,
Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty focused on 8u60, but
we are turning our attention to JDK 9 now.
The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned big features (JEPs)
for FX in JDK 9 are these:
JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for Modularization
J
Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere that talks about these?
On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick wrote:
> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and with crucial features such
> as Jigsaw still a little up in the air but is it possible someone could
> itemise the most likel
29 matches
Mail list logo