On Fri, 14 May 2021 22:30:16 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings
>> for JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
>> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>>
On Fri, 14 May 2021 22:30:16 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings
>> for JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
>> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>>
On Fri, 14 May 2021 22:30:16 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
>> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings
>> for JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
>> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>>
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:20:41 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings for
> JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>
On Fri, 14 May 2021 21:40:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Michael Strauß has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> added missing oldValue assignments
>
>
> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings for
> JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
> specializations of the Property class with a similar design
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:20:41 GMT, Michael Strauß wrote:
> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings for
> JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:20:41 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings for
> JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
> specializations of
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:29:28 GMT, Nir Lisker wrote:
> The benchmark might not tell the real story. To test these sorts of
> performance changes you have to use JMH. There's too much relating to JIT
> optimizations and JVM startup to be able to rely on the current benchmark.
> The theoretical
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 12:08:39 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> Seems like I forgot to hit the send button on the webform. Here's the
>>> tracking number: 9069787.
>>
>> I see it now. And thanks for providing the benchmark. That's what I was
>> looking for.
>
> The bug is now visible here:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:54:40 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings
>> for JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
>> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
>>
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 23:38:29 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> Seems like I forgot to hit the send button on the webform. Here's the
>> tracking number: 9069787.
>>
>> I've used the following manual benchmark, which bidirectionally binds two
>> properties and then produces a billion change
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 23:16:53 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
> Seems like I forgot to hit the send button on the webform. Here's the
> tracking number: 9069787.
I see it now. And thanks for providing the benchmark. That's what I was looking
for.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/454
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 15:20:41 GMT, mstr2
wrote:
> The internal BidirectionalBinding class implements bidirectional bindings for
> JavaFX properties. The design intent of this class is to provide
> specializations for primitive value types to prevent boxing conversions (cf.
> specializations of
14 matches
Mail list logo
