I agree with you on the point that desktops are here to stay, but my point was
that if JavaFX is only ever going to viable on such desktops then it is not
cross platform because by far the biggest focus for commercial software
development companies currently is "post PC" devices like mobiles, ta
The question is: How does perform JavaFX in comparison to e.g. Xamarian?
> Am 19.04.2016 um 13:14 schrieb Scott Palmer :
>
>
>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:18 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
>>
>> Let's face it, without highly optimised AOT, Java and/or JavaFX on mobiles
>> is simply not viable which
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:18 AM, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>
> Let's face it, without highly optimised AOT, Java and/or JavaFX on mobiles is
> simply not viable which in turn implies that JavaFX itself is not even worth
> looking at... RIP.
Let's not go crazy. JavaFX is still the best bet for desk
Well I did ask Johan what AOT they are going to use instead of RoboVM but there
has not be a response yet.
Let's face it, without highly optimised AOT, Java and/or JavaFX on mobiles is
simply not viable which in turn implies that JavaFX itself is not even worth
looking at... RIP.
But I take Jo
Hi,
in my opinion the abandonment of RoboVM is a very big step back for Java on
Mobile because there is NO real alternative to RoboVM. So it has definitely a
big impact on Gluon and JavaFX on Mobile. Gluon uses RoboVM 1.8 - and old
version of RoboVM which will be not developed anymore. So no se
Seems there are more forks out there..
https://github.com/bugvm/bugvm
Sven
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> Good luck to you Erik. I totally agree with you and hope you succeed. If
> there's any way I can help, I will do just that.
>
> Felix
>
> > On 19 Apr 2016, at 04:
Good luck to you Erik. I totally agree with you and hope you succeed. If
there's any way I can help, I will do just that.
Felix
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 04:39, Erik De Rijcke wrote:
>
> I'm currently looking if I can get some robovm fork kickstarted. (
> https://github.com/FlexoVM/flexovm/issues/4
I'm currently looking if I can get some robovm fork kickstarted. (
https://github.com/FlexoVM/flexovm/issues/4 ).
It's really a shame that for this one time Java has a real nice aot
llvm compiler, MS kills it. Being able to compile Java (or any
bytecode language) to a native, fast and small execut
I wonder what the performance of alternatives to RoboVM is like...
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 03:09, Steve Hannah wrote:
>
> https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784242565357568
>
> The Gluon blog post from a few months ago (when @robovm was acquired by
>> @xamarin) is still almost entirely relevant
So what AOT will you be using now? The last RoboVM AOT or something else?
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 03:15, Johan Vos wrote:
>
> Indeed, this doesn't have any impact on JavaFX.
> The Gluon tools are currently using the RoboVM AOT 1.8, which was the last
> open-source version.
>
> RoboVM delivered a
Indeed, this doesn't have any impact on JavaFX.
The Gluon tools are currently using the RoboVM AOT 1.8, which was the last
open-source version.
RoboVM delivered a whole set of products, including an AOT, but also a
system that provides some JNI functionality, a set of bindings that create
Java cla
https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784242565357568
The Gluon blog post from a few months ago (when @robovm was acquired by
> @xamarin) is still almost entirely relevant
> http://gluonhq.com/gluon-supports-multiple-jvms/
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> So what do th
So what do they use instead?
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 02:52, Steve Hannah wrote:
>
> According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
> https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick
> wrote:
>
>> I just read this article which sta
According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting
> down".
>
> https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
