Re: which technology should give preference

2018-09-06 Thread John-Val Rose
Yes, as I suggested too, this is probably not the appropriate forum to post such questions. I tried to say this in an inoffensive way as possible because we are all human and make simple mistakes. I wish Amno all the best with their JavaFX app and I would suggest they check-out the products

Re: which technology should give preference

2018-09-06 Thread Michael Ennen
No worries. Also I agree with Johan that it would be more appropriate to ask questions like this on, say, Stack Overflow. As Johan mentioned this list is for discussing the development of JavaFX itself (not the use of it). Cheers, Michael Ennen On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM John-Val Rose

Re: which technology should give preference

2018-09-06 Thread John-Val Rose
Thanks Michael - your answer was way better than mine! > On 7 Sep 2018, at 10:19, Michael Ennen wrote: > > Amno, > > It is not a zero-sum choice. FXML is a part of JavaFX. FXML does not add > anything, per se (in terms of nodes, controls, etc.) FXML allows for > decoupling > the specific UI

Re: which technology should give preference

2018-09-06 Thread Michael Ennen
Amno, It is not a zero-sum choice. FXML is a part of JavaFX. FXML does not add anything, per se (in terms of nodes, controls, etc.) FXML allows for decoupling the specific UI configuration (in terms of what nodes contain which and their positions, etc.). Basically it is the most sustainable (in

Re: which technology should give preference

2018-09-06 Thread John-Val Rose
FXML is “part” of JavaFX. It’s the format used to specify the UI of a JavaFX application. Plus I don’t think this is the appropriate list to post such questions as it is intended as a forum to discuss the development of JavaFX itself. > On 7 Sep 2018, at 09:47, AmnoJeeuw wrote: > > I am