On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 22:09 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:59 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:54 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 20, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:23
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 10:13 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Been there, done that. Reread what I wrote: the issue
is the *board* not wiring it.
The current code to check is RTCK supported only
addresses the JTAG adapter. There's no way for it
to discern the case which I listed: adapter
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 17:18 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
All,
(especially david zach, you seem to do this very well).
Yes, this is some what off-topic for this list, but it is on topic
because the list wants small more reviewable patches. To that end, I'm
looking for a better way to deal
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 10:50 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
It sounds like the problem relates to the fact that reset_config will
not work for all combinations of interfaces and targets. All of this
discussion makes me think that OpenOCD needs two reset_config commands:
one for the interface
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 15:17 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
What I would like to see is that we push funky rules into board/target
config
files and keep the reset_config implementation as simple as possible.
One reason I dislike that model
Hi all,
Last night, I committed patches to hide the definition of the
target_type_s structure from out-of-module users. This was done over
the course of a few series of patches. I apologize if any problems crop
up, but I will report my own status in a new thread following this one.
Suffice it
Hi all,
After my patch series today, I discovered that I am finally able to
flash my custom target reliably from the latest trunk.
This is the _first_ time that I have seen success with a recent build.
Personally, I consider this a major breakthrough in terms of stability.
After over a month
Hi all,
The following things nagged at me when I did the target_type clean-up:
1) Remove redundant structure typedefs:
a) Entails the following steps (for each named struct type):
i) s/^typedef struct type_s/struct type_s/
ii) s/^} type_t;/};/
iii) s/type_t/struct type_s/
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 21:31 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
duane [about target_types.h]and openocd/types.h
I do like what you have done with target_types.h - Yes, absolutely -
good idea, I think I said it wrong, I'm sure I'll make that mistake again.
zach You want to expose every struct
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 16:37 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
The following things nagged at me when I did the target_type clean-up:
1) Remove redundant structure typedefs:
a) Entails the following steps (for each named struct type):
i) s/^typedef struct type_s/struct type_s
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 04:15 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
The 'struct foo_s' syntax is code bloat that obscures the actual
algorithms. 'foo_t' is shorter.
I assume you prefer u32 over uint32_t, then? ;) Nevermind
I think 'struct foo' is much more clear when reading and writing code.
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 16:37 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
The following things nagged at me when I did the target_type clean-up:
1) Remove redundant structure typedefs:
a) Entails the following steps (for each named struct type):
i) s/^typedef struct type_s/struct type_s
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 15:03 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Remove broken whitespace ... mostly at end of line, but
also in some cases blocks of inappropriate empty lines.
And spell comamnd right. :)
---
src/flash/avrf.c | 108 ++--
src/flash/lpc288x.c | 94 +-
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 05:16 +0200, Michael Bruck wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Michael Bruck wrote:
The 'struct foo_s' syntax is code bloat that obscures the actual
algorithms. 'foo_t' is shorter.
Disagree about
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 21:00 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Michael Bruck wrote:
and I imagined how much worse that that would get once we mix in
struct and enum.
Heck, I imagined how much *better* it would be, especially
if the whitespace/layout bugs got fixed. ;)
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:38 -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Hi all,
Follow below links to some BSDL files:
NXP LPC:
http://www.standardics.nxp.com/support/models/lpc2000/
Freescale PowerPC:
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/overview.jsp?code=DRPPCBSDLFLS
Freescale i.MX1
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:15 +0100, Peter Denison wrote:
The debugging code in jlink_tap_execute() called when
_DEBUG_USB_COMMS_ is
defined was using the entire cached scan length to print the results
buffers, and not the correct length of each individual buffer.
Committed, r1955.
--Z
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 23:45 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
In addition, the following issues appear to require resolution, in
order
to decided whether they should be accomplished for 0.2.0 or postponed:
- ft2232 high-speed device support
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 23:45 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
In addition, the following issues appear to require resolution, in
order
[snip]
- fix jlink to work with large scan chains (e.g. R.Doss svf test).
As long as the fix
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:01 +0300, Vytautas Lukenskas wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009 10:31:25 massimiliano cialdi wrote:
but make stops whit an error:
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2
-I/home/POWERSOFT/massimiliano/download/openocd/libftd2xx0.4.16_x86_64
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 13:02 +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
The following tasks appear to be pending for the 0.2.0 release:
- fix OMAP3 problems reported by Dick Behme (or did these get resolved?)
- final packaging fix
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:23 +0200, massimiliano cialdi wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Vytautas Lukenskas
vytautas.lukens...@arevita.com wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009 10:31:25 massimiliano cialdi wrote:
but make stops whit an error:
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:30 -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Hi David,
On 5/29/09, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2009, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Did I forget other BSDL links? Show me the link ;-)
TI links theirs right off the generic page for each
Hi all,
The following patch encapsulates the global JTAG interface pointer,
adding a wrapper routine for the only out-of-module user.
I will apply unless there are objections.
Cheers,
Zach
==
Encapsulate the global jtag jtag_interface pointer:
- Add jtag_interface_quit, factored from
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 12:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Make it so the magic reset_config keywords can be provided in any
order. This eliminates needless error paths, and makes it easier
to define things at the right level (adapter, board, target).
It also includes two other behavioral
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 17:50 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Provide basic documentation on the ARM ETM and ETB trace commands.
Fix minor goofs in registration of the ETM commands; and whitespace
issues in the proof-of-concept oocd_trace code. (Plus include a
ref to Dominic's email saying that
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:55 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Start converting the architecture-specific commands to @deffn format,
reviewing against the code.
* armv4_5 disassemble ... now documented; although Jazelle code
is not handled
* It's armv4_5 core_state not core_mode;
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 18:16 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Provide basic documentation for some of the other flash drivers.
avr ... looks incomplete, may work with one AVR8 microcontroller
ecosflash ... can't find docs
lpc288x ... an NXP part, driver seems lpc2888-specific
ocl ... some
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 19:02 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:55 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
2) move board, target, and interface Jim script directories to src/tcl/
- this will move the whole directories intact, parallel to tcl/chip.
- more structure can be added
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 00:56 +0800, simon qian wrote:
This patch make vsllink support very large scan size in dma mode.
Committed, r1926.
Maybe jlink driver can also apply similar patch.
Care to submit one? :)
BTW:
This is my new email on gmail.
Mail me if it breaks anything.
Thanks for
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:19 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
Change function prefix to mg_
Committed, r1927.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:21 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
remove unused bank option
Committed, r1928.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:22 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
remove unused flag
Committed, r1929.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:23 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
add config command
Committed, r1930.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:24 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
large file write/dump support
Committed, r1931.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:55 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Make it so the magic reset_config keywords can be provided in any
order. Example, trst_and_srst after srst_open_drain, omitting
the separate combination (which should be the default in any case).
These sorts of improvement seems like
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 07:44 +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:19 +0900, unsik Kim wrote:
Change function prefix to mg_
Committed, r1927.
One of these patches caused the build error under gcc 4.4
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:53 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Here are more doc updates
- get rid of most PDF generation errors, like the
line too long ones, as well as the can't do
sane linebreak warnings
- restructure flash driver descriptions so each
driver's info is in one
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 23:00 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
1) Rather the commit this my self, I'd like somebody to read through the
comments (double check my work), much of this is by just reading the
source code and entering doxygen text.
2) Well call it doxygen style, sure looks like doxygen,
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 22:43 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 24, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:19 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
=On May 24, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 14:01 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:10 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
[snip]
Sorry Rick, but I think that you and Duane have lost this argument.
You have failed to defend your position with facts
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 14:38 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
Further, you can argue with the following assertions -- only if you
can
show me a patch that proves them wrong:
Show me your patch, or let me commit mine. This debate is silly
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 14:38 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
Further, you can argue with the following assertions -- only if
you
can
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:02 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 25, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
The opposing patch is attached. As I already mentioned, it is
large,
but the changes were done entirely with the following commands:
find . -name \*.[ch] -exec sed -i .old -e 's/u8
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:21 -0700, Paul Thomas wrote:
Hello,
I would like to do a boundary scan on a imx27 part. I've looked
through the documentation and mailing list and I don't see much on
this. The most helpful thing has been a very short wikipedia entry on
the SVF format
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 00:34 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
Add svf_get_mask_u32 to generate a mask according to bitlen.
Fix this bug in other functions except for svf_check_tdo.
Next patch will fix the segfault reported by R.Doss.
Committed, r1914.
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 02:03 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
This patch fix segfault reported by R.Doss.
Committed, r1915.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:55 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
2) move board, target, and interface Jim script directories to src/tcl/
- this will move the whole directories intact, parallel to tcl/chip.
- more structure can be added, if we see fit; this is a small step.
-
http
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:36 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
As Zach Welch mentioned, my posts breaks the thread.
Translation: for some reason he and a few others' replies are often (but
not always) threaded incorrectly in some e-mail readers.
To give a basis for comparison, look at the BerliOS archive
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 13:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Fix a bug that joined us at the last minute, when an efficient
alloca() call got swapped out for a more portable malloc().
Also log one error, to give a clue in case it appears in the wild.
---
src/flash/davinci_nand.c |6 --
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 13:45 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
The Illegal mode for command diagnostic is deeply useless.
Say Command '%s' only runs during configuration stage instead,
letting users know what the real issue is.
---
src/helper/command.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 13:49 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009, David Brownell wrote:
- move deprecated jtag_speed into collection of deprecated calls
Also, I think all those deprecated calls should be issuing runtime
warnings, nudging scripts to get rid of their usage.
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 13:46 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Make startup for the various server ports be quiet, unless
debugging is active: don't emit needless scarey messages.
Update the relevant documentation and its references:
- For these port commands ... cover the default values;
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 15:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
The OpenOCD User Guide: (aka The Guide)
Someone needs to change the name of the document then;
it's now Open On-Chip Debugger (OpenOCD). Agreed that
calling it a User's Guide would clarify
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:53 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
zach [previous things]
david
Well, yes ... what eventually goes into /usr/include should
be strongly limited to the interfaces. How anything gets
implemented inside the library is nobody's busienss except
for the library
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:40 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
That is the other question: stdint.h is a C99 header, yes? It might be
better to unconditionally included it, defining our short types from it.
What do you think?
We already do, it is included by 'types.h'.
Conditionally. The
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
- add iN equivalents to intN_t types; i32 is used by replacements.h
The traditional sibling of a u32 (unsigned) is an s32 (signed).
I don't know where i32 came from, it's an interloper
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:19 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
=On May 24, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
- add iN equivalents to intN_t types; i32 is used by replacements.h
The traditional
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:37 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 21:19 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
=On May 24, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 20:51 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
- add iN equivalents
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 00:38 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
Add #include stdint.h in replacements.h to solve this problem.
There has been a report of this in the past, but I thought that it
turned out to be a red herring:
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 16:11 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Michael Fischer pisze:
have you installed SVN under Cygwin too?
I use MSYS + MinGW to compile, so I guess that I should use some SVN
client for MSYS for that feature to work?
Yes. Take a look at guess-rev.sh.
--Z
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:54 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Comment
- In jlink_execute_reset(jtag_command_t *cmd)
jlink_tap_execute(); Should be removed and be superflous, actually both
of them should be removed.
After seeing your latest post, I now think I understand this to mean
that the
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 13:42 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:54 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Comment
- In jlink_execute_reset(jtag_command_t *cmd)
jlink_tap_execute(); Should be removed and be superflous, actually both
of them should be removed.
After seeing your
Hi all,
The attached patch removes the cmd_queue_cur_state global variable,
replacing all uses with calls to tap_set_state() or tap_get_state().
While this seems completely trivial, I wanted to post it for review.
Any objections? All in favor?
Cheers,
Zach
---
jtag/jtag.c | 13
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 01:08 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I want to get the style guide up-to-date. Here's my plan.
Barring any objections, I will add doc/manual/style.txt by moving the
relevant bits out of openocd.texi. The style guide is for developers
working on the code; the user
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:54 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Michael Fischer wrote:
It looks that these JTAG interfaces have not the same behaviour.
One point could be the RESET signals SRST and TRST. Here the
FT2232 can set both signals at the same time, which I think
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:41 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
Zach Welch pisze:
So if I understand this right:
1) With jtag.c patch from Magnus, it works with short delays.
2) Without that patch, it requires long delays.
Is that summary correct?
No (; If there is ANY delay both versions
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 02:05 +0800, SimonQian wrote:
it only changes svf_check_tdo function,
which is used to check tdo output with desired values.
The patch will call buf_cmp_mask function to do the comparation
instead of
writing the loop code. The patch also fix a bug when data length is
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:22 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
See attached patch.
Doxygen does not build if source dir != build dir.
This patch fixes that.
Does r1901 float your boat better? It's technically more correct, as
far as I know. A PITA, but correct. ;)
Cheers,
Zach
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 18:42 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Common people
So much soul searching about a oneliner in jtag.c .
Setting the current tap state with cmd_queue_cur_state = TAP_RESET is
an obvious error as 5 minutes of code
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 18:48 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
[snip]
At this point, I have a system in place to make it unlikely for me to
let any threads be forgotten, but I am still trying to catch all those
that are still in the air. One thing you might look at is David's
recent NAND changes
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:43 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
NAND support for DaVinci-family drivers, with HW ECC support.
Declare the NAND chip on the DM355 EVM board.
Currently tested on DM355 for Linux interop using the standard
large page (2KB) chip in the EVM socket; hwecc1 and hwecc4
work
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Update two oddball NAND commands to work with {offset, length}
instead of block numbers, matching the other commands as well
as usage in U-Boot and the Linux-MTD utilities.
Document them accordingly. Update the single in-tree use of
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:59 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
When the CPU is in the WFI state, the JTAG interface simply doesn't
respond at all and initial tap examination simply fails. Let's simply
do it again when we come around to assert nSRST.
Committed as r1905.
--Z
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:59 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:54 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On May 20, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 22:23 -0700, Rick Altherr wrote:
On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:54 PM, joern kaipf wrote:
* autodetection if FS
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:57 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Trying again...
My editor is screwing things up with whitespace, hence all those irrelevant
changes...
The second attempt was no better. Here it is done right.
Please let me know if this fixes things, and I will get it committed.
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 03:57 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
I am also thinking that the USB timeout value may be extended a bit
longer.
Right now it is 1000ms. Should be ok. But may not be ok for people
using VM or similar.
The problem with this is that it slows down the failure
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 20:16 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
At this point, I have a system in place to make it unlikely for me to
let any threads be forgotten,
Some Linux groups use a new tool called patchwork which monitors
mailing lists
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:06 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Considering that USB bulk transfers are best effort and might easily
be delayed by concurrent activity to a USB disk or webcam ... a single
second seems absurdly short. Even
been reported and should try to be resolved:
- reset issues (possibly regressions due to 1890, 1892, and 1893)
- flashing on LPC-P2148 (Xiaofan Chen)
- LPC2000 series problems
- others?
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
___
Openocd-development mailing
in these matters.
Cheers,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
P.S. There are other pending RFCS, but they do not seem 0.2.0 material.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 22:38 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Zach
static inline functions should be preferred over macros, yes.
I personally despise 'static inline' functions.
One cannot never set breakpoints on them, because the debugger cannot
figure out *which* instance you want to set
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 20:23 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
I feel like this is a dumb question but here goes Why [are] all
of the TCL configuration files (src/target/{target,board,interface}/*)
located in src/target/ instead of src/tcl
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 06:35 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
zach Also, because they are not really TCL scripts.
zach They are Jim TCL scripts, . so --
zach if anything -- they should be renamed '.jim'
-1 From me.
That suggestion was mostly in jest.
The main config scripts (interface,
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 00:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:53 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Hi
Info : J-Link compiled Feb 20 2006 18:20:20 -- Update --
Info : JLink caps 0x3
Error: J-Link command EMU_CMD_GET_MAX_MEM_BLOCK failed (-110
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:05 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
I prefer the STRIP_CODE_COMMENTS = NO
Reason: Don't hide things. Make it all visible.
Committed r1887.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:12 +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Magnus Lundin lun...@mlu.mine.nu wrote:
There is a set of new patches that has been tested by Michael Fischer, as
far as i know there were no problems.
There are still things that should be fixed in
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:35 +0800, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
2009/5/23 Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net:
I'd like to test as well for my V3 black J-link. It works well with
your previous
patch. But the latest trunk does not build under Arch Linux. It is also
pointed
out by Simon Qian. How
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 00:46 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 00:18 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:53 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
[snip]
There is a set of new patches that has been tested
Hi all,
In thinking about user documentation, I was wondering whether we should
think about adding doc/target/ and doc/boards directories. In it, we
would place a documentation file for each supported target and board,
respectively. It may be possible to consolidate some guides, but this
would
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 02:41 +0200, Magnus Lundin wrote:
[snip]
Simply redirecting users with problems to this list is IMHO not a solution.
This is where the eyeballs are today. Myself, I do not like web forums
and will not voluntarily spend my time on them. Further, I am not keen
on splitting
to these points.
Sincerely,
Zach Welch
Corvallis, OR
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:22 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
I've tripped across several bugs caused by bad printf format strings.
This is foolish, since GCC will tell about them when functions have
proper annotations.
This patch adds annotations to the key command_*() helper functions.
And
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 21:50 +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Wookey [2009-05-19 12:29 +0100]:
As described on
http://www.balloonboard.org/balloonwiki/Balloon3OpenOCD I have working
configs for use with the balloon board and Olimex and Amontec JTAG
dongles. I won't copy them all into this message
Hi all,
I feel like this is a dumb question but here goes Why aren't all
of the TCL configuration files (src/target/{target,board,interface}/*)
located in src/target/ instead of src/tcl/?
I would be more than happy to manage the process of making the moves,
but I cannot understand why this
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 17:14 -0700, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I feel like this is a dumb question but here goes Why aren't all
of the TCL configuration files (src/target/{target,board,interface}/*)
located in src/target/ instead of src/tcl/?
As-is, the question is double-dumb; please s
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 17:02 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Rick Altherr wrote:
At this point we are not introducing new features or
functionality to SVN.
Hmm, I was hoping to send a new NAND driver now that it's
basically working ... and some updated board support
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 21:43 -0400, Duane Ellis wrote:
Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I feel like this is a dumb question but here goes Why aren't all
of the TCL configuration files (src/target/{target,board,interface}/*)
located in src/target/ instead of src/tcl/?
I presume you
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 18:25 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Add a NAND Commands section to to the TEXI docs, covering the basic
commands except for those previously discussed as being due for removal
(nand copy) or switching to use byte offsets not block numbers.
This uses the @deffn... syntax
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 19:49 -0500, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Dean Glazeski dngl...@gmail.com
Applied r1880.
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
601 - 700 of 873 matches
Mail list logo
