On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
I said I didn't want to start a flamewar and provided there has been, at
least, a slight interest on my messages, I'll try to clear up some point and
leave the thread alone.
I cannot resist correcting you on one point though.
[...]
That
W.r.t. choice of version control, many OpenOCD maintainers
have extensive git expertise and nobody has expressed interest
in Mercurial.
Lots of patches come from git at this point so many top
contributors clearly use it too.
You'd be hard pressed to get any sort of enthusiasm about any
other
Try now.
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
!!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP !!!
Why are we moving to GIT anyway? What was wrong with SVN?
gr.
Ronald
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
I did not but I have now and tbh I'm not impressed. Sure git has some
advantages, but do we really care about the distributed nature, better
branch support, higher performance and other things? What I read was:
Also not mentioned are Subversion's support for http(s) and
WebDAV,
and its
1. Berlios svn will be made read only and the svn head will be deleted,
leaving behind only a README w/reference to the openocd project at
sourceforge. The entire svn history will remain available on Berlios
indefinitely.
Question from a dumb-ass:
Is the entire repository (including all
On Monday 05 October 2009, Ronald Vanschoren wrote:
Please keep in mind some people are using Windows here.
There are quite a few folk using git from Windows...
Not three hours ago I pulled a repository onto an XP
machine (via cygwin).
The build breakage was completely unrelated to GIT.
On Monday 05 October 2009, Nico Coesel wrote:
Is the entire repository (including all branches and tags)
moved to SF or just head?
Right now there are git-svn repositories that have whatever
could be imported, but I think just the trunk is at SF.
Is there anything in those branches/etc that's
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Nico Coesel ncoe...@dealogic.nl wrote:
1. Berlios svn will be made read only and the svn head will be deleted,
leaving behind only a README w/reference to the openocd project at
sourceforge. The entire svn history will remain available on Berlios
indefinitely.
El Lunes, 5 de Octubre de 2009 22:07:35 David Brownell escribió:
On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
In short, the following will happen:
1. The source will be held in git.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/
!!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP
On 2009-10-06, Ra?l S?nchez Siles rsanch...@infoglobal.es wrote:
!!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP !!!
I think mercurial [0] could be a good option. It's a well
known distributed VCS, maybe not as spread or known as git,
but it's fulfilling most if not all general users
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Grant Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 12:52 PM
To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git
My impression, after using git just a little, is that it is a good tool,
it takes some learning for effective use.
For development work it seems that it gives me much better support for
testing several different versions of experimental code than SVN so here
it is a big step forward.
I do not
There was a suggestion for using Google groups to host the mailing list.
I've had success with it in the past with projects like Symfony. As long as
the mailing list isn't hosted on Yahoo groups, I won't complain (LEON3
people do this and I don't like it).
OK. Google groups is one
On Monday 05 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
In short, the following will happen:
1. The source will be held in git.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openocd/
!!! And if anyone objects to GIT, please speak up ASAP !!!
So far the only issue raised with $SUBJECT seems to be
that we
So the only thing we need to agree on *now* is to
move git to sourceforge.
No dissent heard so far on that one.
I also believe there is a consensus that Berlios does
not have the qualities we're looking for and that
we need to either move away now or get a plan
in place asap for migrating away.
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge, have
you considered GitHub? Just put a README.markdown in the
project and it will become a nice webpage front for the
project. They already provide source browsing and snapshots
available via HTTP, and make it trivially easy for anyone
to (a)
Le 05/10/2009 17:19, Øyvind Harboe a écrit :
So the only thing we need to agree on *now* is to
move git to sourceforge.
I am supportive of the move to sourceforge.
No dissent heard so far on that one.
I also believe there is a consensus that Berlios does
not have the qualities we're
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge,
AFAIK that's just the email. Which has issues like
crappy archives, bad spam filtering, ads, and such.
have you considered GitHub?
In terms of GIT support is it significantly better
than
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
3. the mailing list will be disabled and all openocd subscribers will
receive an invitation to subscribe to the openocd mailing list at
sourceforge. The sourceforge mailing list is the least sucky
alternative for
And in case anyone wants suggestions about how to start
learning ...
http://git-scm.com/course/svn.html
That's addressed to folk more familiar with SVN than GIT.
- Dave
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:37 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many people seem to not be fond of sourceforge,
AFAIK that's just the email. Which has issues like
crappy archives, bad spam filtering, ads, and such.
have you
-Original Message-
From: David Brownell [mailto:davi...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 6:37 PM
To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
Cc: Austin, Alex
Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] Moving to git
On Monday 05 October 2009, Austin, Alex wrote:
Since many
W.r.t. the choice of sourceforge for git:
- we already have it running and tested there
- there is no obviously superior alternative. If we switch
every time we find something that is 10% better, we'll
never get stability and a decision in place.
Does anyone know a git hosting alternative that
24 matches
Mail list logo
