Re: [Openocd-development] GPL violations (ftd2xx)

2010-04-11 Thread Øyvind Harboe
 If those threats were not serious, then I'll post a version linked to
 ftd2xx too - it's still better on Windows, and I don't think this is
 going to change any time soon.

IANAL, but stating your intentions publicly to violate the GPL license
does not improve your standing in any way...

The contributors are working with SFLC(as posted a while ago)
to get in place the routines to handle this the right way and while
it would be unsavory to solicit evidence of GPL violations we forward
what we are handed to our contact at SFLC so he can work with it.

Lawyers in general keep their cards close to their chest, it's a bit
like playing cards, so if you don't see a lot of activity, doesn't
mean that nothing isn't happening ;-)

Big players know that these things can take a long time and have
huge impacts, so they rarely blatantly ignore GPL. Ignorance
does exist in large organizations though...

Please feel free to email SFLC(you have the contact information) or me
the details of the violation and I'll give it for our SFLC contact to chew on.

-- 
Meet us in Paris at rts EMBEDDED SYSTEMS 2010 - March 30. and April 1.
http://www.zylin.com/events_rts.html

Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


[Openocd-development] GPL violations

2010-04-08 Thread freddie_chopin
I've recently wrote that I know of 4 GPL violations (distributing OpenOCD with 
ftd2xx library). Make that 5 now... Since there are NO activities from the most 
dedicated GPL-fans, than maybe I'll just post such version on my webpage too?

4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] GPL violations

2010-04-08 Thread Nico Coesel
 -Original Message-
 From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
 development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of
freddie_cho...@op.pl
 Sent: donderdag 8 april 2010 13:02
 To: openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
 Subject: [Openocd-development] GPL violations
 
 I've recently wrote that I know of 4 GPL violations (distributing
OpenOCD
 with ftd2xx library). Make that 5 now... Since there are NO activities
from
 the most dedicated GPL-fans, than maybe I'll just post such version on
my
 webpage too?

Freddie,
IMHO its in everyone's best interest if you describe what and where the
GPL violations are. People can then decide whether your findings are GPL
violations and what to do about them. Hear no evil - see no evil is not
going to work.

Nico

___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] GPL violations

2010-04-08 Thread freddie_chopin
Użytkownik Nico Coesel ncoe...@dealogic.nl napisał:
Freddie,
IMHO its in everyone's best interest if you describe what and where the
GPL violations are. People can then decide whether your findings are GPL
violations and what to do about them. Hear no evil - see no evil is not
going to work.

All what I found is a pure GPL violation (according to GPL-fans from this list) 
- those are OpenOCD binaries linked to ftd2xx.dll or OpenOCD binary dynamically 
loading ftd2xx.dll.

Why should I rat anyone (remember, that I'd love to distribute OpenOCD with 
ftd2xx.dll) when - as I said previously - finding one of that sites is TRIVIAL, 
and yet no-one has done anything... There was NO action what-so-ever, and when 
there was a discussion a year ago some ppl would kill for GPL.

4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] GPL violations

2010-04-08 Thread Laurent Gauch

So let us know where do you find GPL violation  ?
A T T E N T I O N  : the GPL violation is not only for any distribution 
of openocd with FTD2XX driver, but for any openocd binary  with no 
solution to rebuild openocd from scratch ... exemple : a product 
embedding openocd in an external embedded server with no possibility to 
build/upgrade openocd from scratch. Here you will find other GPL 
violations!!!



___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


[Openocd-development] GPL violations (ftd2xx)

2010-02-14 Thread Freddie Chopin
Hi [;

You do remember the ftd2xx case? I clearly remember some of OpenOCD 
leaders stating that any violation of GPL (distributing OpenOCD linked 
to ftd2xx) will be legally fought, courts and various organizations 
would be informed, etc.. Yet today I've found a fourth case of violating 
this rule, and believe me - I'm not searching for them. The first two 
are really local and you have to dig deep to find them, the third is 
ancient (r200-something), but the last one is... well - it's huge [;

If those threats were not serious, then I'll post a version linked to 
ftd2xx too - it's still better on Windows, and I don't think this is 
going to change any time soon.

4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] GPL violations (ftd2xx)

2010-02-14 Thread Freddie Chopin
On 2010-02-14 18:28, Freddie Chopin wrote:
 ... the third is ancient (r200-something) ...

Sorry - multiply that by 7.5 (r1500-something). There are other versions 
in the same place too.

4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development