If it is GPL compatible I guess it would make sense to add support for the unicall library to it. There is a bit of move to start using unicall for all things TDM and the more boards are supported the better. This way, since we will be pushing for usage of unicall in other projects as well, you wou
Chris Albertson wrote:
>There is no problem with binary drivers. The GPL provides
>a test where you can determine if linking non-GPL code is OK.
>Read the GPL or details but if the linked code uses a well
>defined interface and in theory there _could_ be multiple
>suppliers for the non-GPl'd bi
There is no problem with binary drivers. The GPL provides
a test where you can determine if linking non-GPL code is OK.
Read the GPL or details but if the linked code uses a well
defined interface and in theory there _could_ be multiple
suppliers for the non-GPl'd binary then the binary, even w
On Wed 14 Dec 2005 19:11, Mikael Magnusson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hi All,
> >
> > I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
> > just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
> > binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have sou
>Have you considered using the woomera interface?
>
>/Mikael
>
>
I found it!
I will look into it because this seem to be interesting.
Jan
___
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
hi
>So if it is a kernel driver, you don't need to bother about GPL of OpenPBX.
>
>What kind of driver (for what hardware) is it? And what has it to do with
>OpenPBX (which interface will be used with OpenPBX)?
>
>Armin
>
>
It is a 4xE1/T1 board in PCI & cPCI form. I will need to interface to
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Armin Schindler wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> > > hi All,
> > >
> > > I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
> > > just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains
Mikael Magnusson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi All,
I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have source for.
My understanding o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi All,
>
> I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
> just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
> binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have source for.
>
> My understanding of GPL is that it will be im
Armin Schindler wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi All,
I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have source for.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi All,
>
> I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
> just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
> binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have source for.
>
> My understanding of GPL
hi All,
I have some boards I would like to add support for in OpenPBX, but I
just realized that I can't release the driver since it contains (1)
binary firmware + (2) a binary component I don't have source for.
My understanding of GPL is that it will be impossible to use OpenPBX
with this boar
12 matches
Mail list logo
