Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu, Attached patch is for TC 41, 42. We have noticed one bug in sidep, will update it soon. Thanks, Minh On 22/02/16 23:48, Hans Nordebäck wrote: Hi, please see enclosed patch for TC #1, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10 and #11/Thanks HansN On 02/19/2016 10:09 AM, minh chau wrote: Hi Nagu,

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi, please see enclosed patch for TC #1, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10 and #11/Thanks HansN On 02/19/2016 10:09 AM, minh chau wrote: Hi Nagu, Thanks for your testing. Below is our investigation from TC1 - TC31 which seem to be important, plus some patches that we're trying to fix the issues 1. IMM

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

It seems the file wasn't attached properly. Take #2. Quoting Gary Lee : Hi Nagu Please ignore fix.patch Minh previously sent, and replace with this version. Thanks Gary On 19 Feb 2016, at 8:09 PM, minh chau wrote: Hi Nagu, Thanks for

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu Please ignore fix.patch Minh previously sent, and replace with this version. Thanks Gary > On 19 Feb 2016, at 8:09 PM, minh chau wrote: > > Hi Nagu, > > Thanks for your testing. > Below is our investigation from TC1 - TC31 which seem to be important, plus

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Minh, I thought traces should be ok, so I didn't uploaded the configuration file. I will upload it going forward. Thanks -Nagu > -Original Message- > From: minh chau [mailto:minh.c...@dektech.com.au] > Sent: 15 February 2016 14:27 > To: Nagendra Kumar; Gary Lee > Cc:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu, One thing that can help us to reproduce your problems, that can you attach to the ticket the models you are using for test? Thanks, Minh On 15/02/16 19:32, Nagendra Kumar wrote: > Hi Gary, > I am using the patch tar sent by Minh(9 Feb on devel list) and I using > these on same

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu I think we need to make sure we’re all looking at the same source code. I have trouble recreating some of the problems you’ve seen, but I see other problems. Perhaps we can set up a fork of opensaf-staging on source forge, and check in the patches? Thanks Gary > On 15 Feb 2016, at

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Gary, Yes, you are right. I attach gdb in amf_demo process only. Thanks -Nagu > -Original Message- > From: Gary Lee [mailto:gary@dektech.com.au] > Sent: 15 February 2016 10:30 > To: Nagendra Kumar > Cc: minh chau; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Praveen Malviya; opensaf- >

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu Just wanted to confirm that when you attach gdb to a process, the process is amf_demo, and not amfnd? Thanks Gary > On 13 Feb 2016, at 1:35 AM, Nagendra Kumar wrote: > > TC #27: Same configuration as TC #24: > Add a new Csi in running demo appl: Keep gdb in SU1

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Minh, Doing some sanity testing and I am observing below problems: 1 controller and 1 payload. SU1 is hosted on payload PL-3. 1. Issue shutdown on SU1 and stop the controller. Start controller, Amfd is crashing and controller is not able to come up: Feb 5 13:51:08 PM_SC-1

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Minh, While testing backward compatibility with older branches, I found that Standby Amfd(not configured with IMMSV_SC_ABSENCE_ALLOWED) is not coming up: Feb 4 14:36:52 PM_SC-2 osafamfd[32168]: Started Feb 4 14:36:53 PM_SC-2 osafimmnd[32118]: NO SearchInit ERR_INVALID_PARAM:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Nagu, Can you describe your backward compatibility test case? It looks to me that the new attr saAmfUnassignedAlarmStatus was not added to IMM while standby amfd was running cloud resilience version Thanks, Minh On 04/02/16 20:08, Nagendra Kumar wrote: > Hi Minh, > While

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] Review Request for amf: Add support for cloud resilience [#1620] V2

Hi Minh, While testing backward compatibility with older branches, I found that Standby Amfd(not configured with IMMSV_SC_ABSENCE_ALLOWED) is not coming up: Feb 4 14:36:52 PM_SC-2 osafamfd[32168]: Started Feb 4 14:36:53 PM_SC-2 osafimmnd[32118]: NO SearchInit