Hello
Everyone who is interested in authentication should check this out:
http://oauth.net/core/1.0/
Looks well established standard which does OpenId+Tokens and is getting
adopted in web industry. What do you think?
regards,
Tommi
___
Opensim-dev
It looks like OpenId Authentication 2.0 has similar functionality:
http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0.html
regards,
Tommi
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Tommi Laukkanen
tommi.s.e.laukka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Everyone who is interested in authentication should check this
Dear Rich:
On OSGrid is a region called Metaversity Campus, which was recently created
by BlueWall Slade for the purpose of virtual education. Another region
currently being used for education on OSGrid is Dradis. Additionally, there are
a number of UC Irvine regions.
You might find it
Sorry .. that should read Opensim .. getting my Open's mixed up *LOL*
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Rich White rich.lynn.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
For those interested - We will be hosting a virtual world educators
conference at Pittsburg State University (Dept. of Education building)
in the
Tommil,
Thanks for the pointers about OAuth. I think this is really important.
We need to figure out what security scheme works best for open Virtual
Worlds. I don't necessarily think that we need to tie OpenSim to one
specific scheme, but we really need to figure out what the user
Hi Diva
Thanks for the analysis. I have to admit I have only fastly scanned the
oAuth spec. They advertise that it works for desktop applications so I
assume it should not necessarily be too complex for the end user and not too
hard to implement either. Someone would need to study / poc it or get
Thanks :) I stand corrected
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Diva Canto d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Just to keep the record straight, the Capabilities concept is about 50
years old. It was devised at about the same time as ACLs. For a number of
reasons, ACLs have dominated the field. See here
There's also a very nice paper about it here.
http://srl.cs.jhu.edu/pubs/SRL2003-02.pdf
Tommi Laukkanen wrote:
Thanks :) I stand corrected
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Diva Canto d...@metaverseink.com
mailto:d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Just to keep the record straight, the
I strongly recommend reading that paper I sent the reference to.
The cool thing about CAPs on the web (and the reason why I'm excited
about it, after knowing _of_ CAPs for 20 years and never really getting
them) is that CAPs are URLs that can come and go dynamically. Most of
the CAPs
I'm trying to understand what exactly *we* are doing wrt CAPs. I'm a bit
confused.
Here's the list of all capabilities I see in the code:
EventQueueGet http://sim/CAPS/EQG/random uuid
ObjectAdd http://sim/CAPS/OA/random uuid
RemoteParcelRequest http://sim/CAPS/caps seed0009/
MapLayer
I don't know about the snapshot one because I haven't actually looked to see
what CAPS the client is requesting lately. But the others are caps services
that the client requests (or at least used to).
As you know when the client first connects it makes a request to the caps seed
that it was
I found this page:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Current_Sim_Capabilities
Which, not surprisingly, is not entirely in sync with what we have in
the code. ObjectAdd is not there, and there are many on that list that
we don't have.
But the PublicSnapshotDataInfo is still a mystery.
MW
Good morning
Here are some engineering concerns I see with CAPS URLs:
1) If client is given CAPS URL to access something we need to have access
list / ownership and user role information in the database to deduce if the
user has the right for capabilities he/she is requesting for. CAPS URLs do
13 matches
Mail list logo
