0.6.6.10201 (Git:6cf610) (Dev) (interface version 5)
/Stefan
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Toni Alatalo
Sent: den 3 september 2009 20:07
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev
that could make everyone happy :)
/Stefan
~Toni
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Toni Alatalo
Sent: den 3 september 2009 20:07
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev
With the use of git or svn, what is the relationship between the
Version and the Build #? Once upon a time, we would do a
show version in the console, and it was very clear which specific
opensim version was being used. Now, it says:
OpenSim 0.6.6 (Dev) (interface version 5)
rather than
Yes, is very dark. In our server we are using the last Diva's version from
git, than works in our case better than the 0.6.6 downladed from the wiki, a
service with 0.6.6 .10108, in OSGrid, an other with 0.6.6 .239a1 and other
with modrex.
The 0.6.6.6 in the console show the same interfase v 5,
The 'interface v5' part refers to the interface protocol between the region
simulator and the grid (and defacto, between
region simulators). It doesn't have anything at all to do with the OpenSim
version (0.6.6).
In principle, if you are running from a source repository update then the git
Paul Fishwick wrote:
Justin:
Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
The 'interface v5' part refers to the interface protocol between the region
simulator and the grid (and defacto, between
region simulators). It doesn't have anything at all to do with the OpenSim
version (0.6.6).
OK
In
I am using TortoiseGit and did a show log. When I do this, and
show the graph clicking on the topmost message dated 9/2/2009,
there is something that says
Showing 10185 Revisions from Revision a82950 to 6cf610
not sure how to interpret this hexadecimal indexing. Should I consider
10185 to be the
Paul Fishwick wrote:
I am using TortoiseGit and did a show log. When I do this, and
show the graph clicking on the topmost message dated 9/2/2009,
there is something that says
Showing 10185 Revisions from Revision a82950 to 6cf610
It will be 6cf610, as this is only two revisions from the
I have been playing around with a solution for the sequential version
reporting, but it is not as simple as it may seem. The best description
of the problem and solution I have found is at:
http://michaelandlaura.org.uk/~michael/blog/index.php?id=379
The catch is that we appear to be using
Paul Fishwick wrote:
Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
It will be 6cf610, as this is only two revisions from the bleeding edge.
a82950 is the very oldest revision and 10185 might be the absolute number of
revs.
As long as there is a way that we know how to compare revisions. IE:
The next
Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
It will be 6cf610, as this is only two revisions from the bleeding edge.
a82950 is the very oldest revision and 10185 might be the absolute number of
revs.
As long as there is a way that we know how to compare revisions. IE:
The next revision to 6cf610 will be
krtaylor wrote:
I have been playing around with a solution for the sequential version
reporting, but it is not as simple as it may seem. The best description
of the problem and solution I have found is at:
http://michaelandlaura.org.uk/~michael/blog/index.php?id=379
The catch is that
12 matches
Mail list logo
