, this would not cancel out the 6 months
cooldown period that would be applied to your work with the 1.x
viewer code base, since that has not been relicensed, or at least
not yet.
Melanie
Dickson, Mike (ISS Software) wrote:
So, LL has released the viewer 2 codebase as LGPL v2 (as opposed to GPLv2
Ok, this is a slightly different position than I've heard before...
The issue of simple code inclusion is well defined IMO, OpenSIM core can't
include GPL'd code into the BSD licensed core without running afoul of the GPL.
That's a simple license compatibility issue. But in the past what I've
I made my assumption and asked for clarification because it didn't specifically
state what's listed on the Wiki. Thanks for the reference. Finding things in
the Wiki can be.. ummm. Challenging. In particular Diva didn't address the
6mos rule and seemed to focus on the GPL. If I misread I
My understanding from the OGP discussions to date is that the protocol doesn't
*require* persistent accounts. That's more an issue of policy for the agent
domain.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On
Right, but any decent framework/platform that has any expectation of being used
designs in the open and publishes a roadmap for the changes planned so that
people that do wish to productize around it can plan and do so without huge
hassles. They don't just throw shit up on a wall and see what
Diva wrote:
I'll take a look at the documentation, to delete outdated instructions.
But that wiki is a jungle, so I'm pretty sure I won't find all the pages
that need updates.
Any effort there is appreciated (at least by me). One of the biggest barriers
IMO to doing anything in OpenSim
Does anyone have a working config using the new connector architecture? There
are bunches of example files in the bin directory for the old way
(OpenSIm.ini) and the new way (OpenSim.Server.in ... I think) and honestly
I'm not sure what has to be set up to use the connector style and what
arguments as the console
commands.
Regards,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)
Sent: Friday, 4 September 2009 8:05 AM
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Dr Scofield
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 3:19 AM
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] ConsoleClient -pass option
Dickson, Mike (ISS Software) wrote:
I'd agree with Dave on this one. Just
a console application.
Only, it doesn't use the (dated) XMLRPC, it uses RESTful requests.
XMLRPC admin is only available in region servers, and is too limited
a tool even if beefed up to ever replace a console.
Melanie
Dickson, Mike (ISS Software) wrote:
Right. That gets around the issue. BTW
I'd agree with Dave on this one. Just a simple long ps listing gets you the
password if its on cleartext on the command line. At least the file can be
locked down via permissions. A password on the command line is pretty much
insecure. Might as well not have one.
Mike
-Original
years (often) before adopting an
upgrade to Windows, for example.
Wait til all the bugs are out before adopting the upgrade.
- Len
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)
mike.dick...@hp.commailto:mike.dick...@hp.com wrote:
I have to agree. The thought was that the new
Might also look at the git submodule stuff for a case like Diva's where you
really want a separate repo but it's attached to another tree. That is, the git
tip at the main repo has core code and the submodules refer to separate trees
with dependant but not mainline features.
Mike
13 matches
Mail list logo
