I do believe we're all feeling the advent of 0.7 - a milestone in any open
source project.
Here's a crazy idea for you; how about we agree to freeze feature set and major
architecture as of now, and concentrate on only:
* Finalizing the backend restructuring
* Clear mantis (hell,
Have you even looked at mantis??? there are 728 open tickets, chances are if
we clear mantis, we will have OpenSimulator 1.0.. I personally don't see
this as feasible, this is to me looks like us trying to control what all the
developers are doing, and I have to -1 this idea as it would probably
I can agree with that, if everyone else agrees i have no problem with it, I
would just hate for anyone to think that we are locking things up and they
wont have our support. And mostly i was more concerned with trying to clear
mantis, that seams a bit unrealistic, as a good portion of fixing the
Again, this would be entirely by agreement - anybody not wishing to do bug
fixing can do whatever they like, but I do think even core devs get a kick out
of bugfixing now and then, and adding stuff like those pesky last lsl commands.
Regarding the mantis, there are several things that can
I think its a great tone Stefan :D
I think that even failing to accomplish the goals of such an effort would
produce much benefit for the project.
Sign me up :)
*sharpens mantis pencils*
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Stefan Andersson ste...@tribalmedia.sewrote:
Again, this would be
Dan wrote:
Is it possible to configure a huge disk asset-cache for region servers?
A disk cache is currently being tested.
No guarantees, warranties, express or implied but the test patch is
available at
http://code.google.com/p/flotsam/downloads/list
This is just something I threw together
On a side note, one thing to profile would be to work towards having large
binaries transferred as streams instead of bringing them into memory and
transforming them into various temporary forms.
Best regards,
Stefan Andersson
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:12:30 -0700
From:
Given the recent changes for modularity has there been any thought to
being able to configure a seperate shared cache across multiple regions.
Something like the Jakarta JCS stuff (http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/)
comes to mind. I'm not suggesting that specific implementation but
simply that if
I will toss in a crazy idea from the side :)
Have every other point release alternate its focus between features vs
stability...
.7 - more stability, .8 - more features, .9 - more stability etc.
Something akin to the Linux development model
Daniel
Hey,
Personally I would say that the way to approach clearing the mantis
would be... not clearing the mantis :P
Rather, get someone to go through each ticket and jot down a summary of
each; then you'll end up with a list of stuff that needs fixing (or
changing, or adding). The core devs can
Goodmorning everyone,
As a result of argument between Nebadon, Jamenai and myself about
OpenWiredux I decided to step down as a developer on that project.
Also the other projects that I maintain have seized development.
Please remove the following projects from the Gforge asap as they'll be
I'm only using the WiRedux stuff of the modules you listed personally.
But I don't think the BSD license works the way you think it does.
Attribution is certainly required by the license and no reason you
couldn't do a closed source version based on it. But what you put out
under a BSD license is
I stand corrected, I went back and you are correct, i only had closed
filtered out and not the resolved issues, hence the inflated count. sorry
about that. I think all of these ideas are great, sorry to be the stickler
in the mud, but I'd rather everyone beat up on me now while were discussing
it
Just to pick on the Longest Open for a little bit, here they are. The last
column is the number of days the Mantis has been open.
It seems to me that a Mantis open over a year is a good candidate for a feature
request, perhaps a 'wont fix' or even a 'we did fix and forgot to close'.
So, to
Once you release something under the BSD license, anyone can do
anything with it, as long as the license is followed (i.e., the
copyright clause is followed). It cannot be retroactively removed.
Further, anything on the Forge, in the subversion, is openly
available. You can continue your
Fly Man,
It simply doesn't work like that. You didn't make any mention of a
creative commons license at the time of posting. The projects have been
clearly tagged as BSD, i'm afraid there's no way for you to revoke that.
Tom.
Fly Man wrote:
Thomas, everything I posted on the Gforge is under
Could you perhaps sort those by the assigned priority? 721 is
priority 'low', for example.
-Kyle H
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Charles Krinke c...@pacbell.net wrote:
Just to pick on the Longest Open for a little bit, here they are. The last
column is the number of days the Mantis has
I'm going to try to be as diplomatic as possible here.
All of us may contribute to various forge projects as we and our peers may
determine from time to time.
I am truly sorry you are upset, Fly-Man, but that does not change anything. We
move forward with or without any one individual and that
Well, there is a way to revoke that and that has just been done.
The projects are closed. In the meanwhile, development has seized on
those projects (which I personally think is just wrong because this
can be solved by 2 people)
I clearly stated to people that I wasn't happy about the way some
Fly-Man
I do not know who is right in your disagreement, but I think if you had
something you were thinking that was not being done in the most correct,
I think the only way would have launched the discussion on mail-list
#opensim-dev and not just you away from everything and remove the work
Ideia, this problem can easily be resolved by 2 people that just say
sorry and revert back the things that they added to the OpenSimWiredux
so I can take a clean copy of the code without the whole mess that it
is now.
So, in other words as some won't know what I said on #opensim-dev:
Jamenai:
How about you check out the subversion tree at the last revision
without the whole mess that it is now? That's what revision control
systems are for, so you can check out old revisions. You can control
your own experience -- while everyone else can cooperate as they want
to.
You should do this
Kyle, please read back what I posted earlier before you start to throw
with words that I won't respond to:
* There's 2 people that just need to apoligize and then we can all get
back to what we're good in.
Unless those people step up and take responsibilty about their
actions, then it means that
Adam, what's the difference between these two modules? On casual inspection,
the gridwide notification in OGSRadmin
looks pretty similar to the existing RemoteAdminPlugin.XmlRpcAlertMethod()
--
justincc
Justin Clark-Casey
http://justincc.wordpress.com
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
How about you check out the subversion tree at the last revision
without the whole mess that it is now? That's what revision control
systems are for, so you can check out old revisions. You can control
your own experience -- while everyone else can cooperate as they want
Dear Fly-Man:
I would like to suggest we step back from a point of honor and try to figure
out how to work together.
There are times in this project when passions rise high and this is one of
those times. I would really like to find a way to move forward without pushing
anyone into a
Hello,
I've started an OS X installer in
http://forge.opensimulator.org/gf/project/osinstaller/, alongside the
existing Windows one. It currently installs a binary version of
0.6.5-post-fixes (r9713), built with Mono 2.4.
But it could still use a lot of work (dependency installation,
creating
Fly-Man-,
When you bring out the big guns, and you aren't on solid ground - people tend
to look down at you - when you start a conversation out in confrontation, then
confrontation you will get.
Regarding, 'revoking' the license, you simply cannot do that legally (go check
with a lawyer) -
+1
Adam
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Jeff Ames
Sent: Sunday, 31 May 2009 8:30 PM
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: [Opensim-dev] Mac OS X OpenSim installer
Hello,
I've started
29 matches
Mail list logo
