[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kinda hard to mistype gnome-short-command-names-are-so-not-practical
as zpool destroy ... too.
You may be right with those short commands, but how about the longer
commands with 2 or 3 chars that are similar to frequently typed program names?
In any way: I don't
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you need more than one? We should have one solid working version that
does what we want. I use gtar because I like compression. It's a habit, and I
just use /usr/sfw/bin/gtar. I would rather just use tar and not have to worry
about which one I
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 10:11, nice wrote:
What exactly is it that you want to do with the data?
I want to encrypt the data first, then write them to the file.
Using the crypto framework I trust ?
How are you planning on getting the keys to your kernel module ?
Are the keys per file or
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 11:30, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If you take this seriously, then ZFS could not have been allowed to be
released
the way it has been, because SVN_27 introduces incompatible changes in the ACL
interface that would have to be addressed before note that these
Erast Benson wrote:
Forget about package format. :-)
M$ Windows do not have any embedded package managers at all. Answer on
your question is simple: Third party application developer *must* take
care of the issue. i.e. He must provide solution which will work on any
OpenSolaris-based distro (or
I received this from the SDLC :
RE: Part Name: Sun Cluster 3.1 8/05 Software,
Platform(s): Solaris (SPARC and x86)
Language(s): Multi-language
Dear Dennis Clarke,
Thank you for downloading Sun Cluster 3.1 8/05 software. You are
entitled to use the downloaded software for following usage:
http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2005-11/sunflash.20051130.1.html
:)
Free, as I understand it, but not yet open-source. I'm no lawyer, but I
read the new license agreement pretty carefully yesterday and it lists
commercial use, personal use, even ratio-based service-provider use.
And
On 12/2/05, Scott Spyrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2005-11/sunflash.20051130.1.html
:)
Free, as I understand it, but not yet open-source. I'm no lawyer, but I
read the new license agreement pretty carefully yesterday and it lists
commercial use,
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:10 +, Brian Nitz wrote:
Erast,
[...snipped]
download a pure opensolaris application binary (package format TBD
;-) and guarantee that it will work on Schillix, Nexenta and Sun's
distribution or should we count
I made an error I did use accidently an old 056 putty version not the below
mentioned one. It works with the 0.58 version.
Regards
Markus
- Original Message -
From: Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Markus Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kinda hard to mistype gnome-short-command-names-are-so-not-practical
as zpool destroy ... too.
You may be right with those short commands, but how about the longer
commands with 2 or 3 chars that are similar to frequently typed
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kinda hard to mistype gnome-short-command-names-are-so-not-practical
as zpool destroy ... too.
You may be right with those short commands, but how about the longer
commands with 2 or
Al Hopper wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kinda hard to mistype gnome-short-command-names-are-so-not-practical
as zpool destroy ... too.
You may be right with those short commands, but how
* Nils Nieuwejaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-20 08:11]:
It appears that BrandX as a name is not going to fly as somebody already
has that name trademarked. We have an alternative name in mind, and
I'm told the lawyers are doing their lawyerly stuff with it now.
We have gotten all the
Just wanted to drop a note and let people know I'm running behind on
build 28. I should have it available next week... I'm aiming for Wednesday.
Sorry for the delay!
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
On 12/2/05, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to drop a note and let people know I'm running behind on
build 28. I should have it available next week... I'm aiming for Wednesday.
cool man .. I figured something was up.
Dennis
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
