Dennis Clarke wrote:
Wow. Guys, the civilization came to a point where well-behaved dogs no
longer go crazy at the sight of a cat. Why would Solaris fans should be
different at the sound of the word "Linux" ;) A welcome into the world
of Solaris should be more welcome.
no one was barking
la
>
> Wow. Guys, the civilization came to a point where well-behaved dogs no
> longer go crazy at the sight of a cat. Why would Solaris fans should be
> different at the sound of the word "Linux" ;) A welcome into the world
> of Solaris should be more welcome.
no one was barking
Dennis Clarke
Wow. Guys, the civilization came to a point where well-behaved dogs no
longer go crazy at the sight of a cat. Why would Solaris fans should be
different at the sound of the word "Linux" ;) A welcome into the world
of Solaris should be more welcome.
Noel, I think most your questions has been
> and even some small businesses need. The price, form factor and noise
> of these solutions also detracts many users from such solutions.
>
> - well .. maybe. I guess if we are talking small 5 man shops then yes,
> no one wants an Opteron screamer jet engine roaring in their office
Exactly the
> Looking forward (rather nervously) to your comments,
> Peter
>
Proposal: The Enterprise-Quality Small Server/Appliance Computer
- great idea
Basic Rational: The power of current server computer systems extends far
beyond what most SOHO (Small Office / Home Office)
- yep .. you're dead accu
Greetings,
The following ideas have been rolling around in my head for a while now, so
yesterday I decided to write them down. I believe this is a reasonable starting
point for a system which does not exist in the market today. So I have decided
to request the opinions of those wiser then mysel
I have also run in to these bugs with HotSpot. I have been able to core
HotSpot while in Eclipse, three different ways (on cvs export, Eclipse started
with java -server, and opening Ant files). I tried sending a bug to Sun, but I
have not heard back yet.
This message posted from opensolari
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> I think we need to point out to our Linux friends that once they do this
>> that will will pollute the root directory with crud. Things like the
>> .bash_history and if they actually login vie dtlogin/gdm or whatever that
>> they will really bork
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> Rich, you need to ask the question "why was I there?" of all people?
>
> Nope!
>
>> you *know* where I stand on Linux vs Solaris issues.
>
> Yep; you're about as anti-Linux as me. :-)
not really ... I have spent a fair amount of time with Deb
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
I think we need to point out to our Linux friends that once they do this
that will will pollute the root directory with crud. Things like the
.bash_history and if they actually login vie dtlogin/gdm or whatever that
they will really bork it up wwith ju
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Rich, you need to ask the question "why was I there?" of all people?
Nope!
> you *know* where I stand on Linux vs Solaris issues.
Yep; you're about as anti-Linux as me. :-)
> The collection of Linux sysadmins were laughing and saying outright
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> [1] the thing booted after install with a text console and pumped out
>> errors
>> about X this that and the other thing. I suspect a broken FX-1200
>> but then again .. the console worked fine in text mode. :-(
>>
>> This was just a j
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>>
>> But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
>>and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will
>> make
>>it easy. I just have a minimal expectation that the current feature set
>> are
>>reflected in some way in the in
Hi!
[Ok... this may be horrible offtopic for OpenSolaris... but maybe there
are some people who played around with "Roller" (which runs
http://bugs.sun.com) and other Blog engines and may be able to help]
Does anyone have a recommendation for a blogging engine which accepts
DocBook/XML as
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> [1] the thing booted after install with a text console and pumped out errors
> about X this that and the other thing. I suspect a broken FX-1200
> but then again .. the console worked fine in text mode. :-(
>
> This was just a joke for the
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
>and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will make
>it easy. I just have a minimal expectation that the current feature set are
>reflected in some way in the installer. Like
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, David Lloyd wrote:
> I wonder if a "Migrating from Linux" community exists...
Of course there is--it's part of the OpenSolaris community. :-)
Actually, more seriously, I think this is the sort of thing that
the Immigrants Community on opensolaris.org is for...
--
Rich Tee
> Dennis,
>
>>> I'm not so sure we've got the culprit here. I'd blame X...they're just
>>> as painful in Linux and FreeBSD.
>>
>> Well, I'm not a Linux guy ya know? But it feels like lately when I
>> install Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Enterpoop Linux 10 or boot a
>> KnoppiX DVD that every
Dennis,
I'm not so sure we've got the culprit here. I'd blame X...they're just
as painful in Linux and FreeBSD.
Well, I'm not a Linux guy ya know? But it feels like lately when I
install Red Hat Enterprise Linux or SUSE Enterpoop Linux 10 or boot a
KnoppiX DVD that everything looks sweet a
> Dennis,
>
>> Let's just say that the instalelr is a piece of crud that had been
>> kicking
>> around forever. When you install a production grade Solaris with CDROM's
>> it will still load in each CDROM one at a time and then it stupidly asks
>> you what to do with the CDROM that it just re
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, noel wrote:
>
>> 1. the command line isn't bash, so I'm kinda stuck about that. can it be
>> switched to bash? or is the solaris command line better than bash...
>
> The default Solaris shell is /bin/sh, which is the original Bourne shell.
> You're free to change your user's
Dennis,
Let's just say that the instalelr is a piece of crud that had been kicking
around forever. When you install a production grade Solaris with CDROM's
it will still load in each CDROM one at a time and then it stupidly asks
you what to do with the CDROM that it just read? Shall I in
> Hi,
>
> I'm giving open solaris a try (installed in vmware), but I'm running into
> some difficulties.
Its not "linux" if probably the first thing that you ran into :-)
I always try to tell people that the command line in Windows XP is not
Linux either but we all seem to expect "ls" to ju
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, noel wrote:
1. the command line isn't bash, so I'm kinda stuck about that. can it be
switched to bash? or is the solaris command line better than bash...
The default Solaris shell is /bin/sh, which is the original Bourne shell.
You're free to change your user's shell to a
Hi,
I'm giving open solaris a try (installed in vmware), but I'm running into some
difficulties.
1. the command line isn't bash, so I'm kinda stuck about that. can it be
switched to bash? or is the solaris command line better than bash...
2. I've heard zfs is supposed to be great and was hoping
I NEED SOMME DUMPS FROM EU
CAN YOU HELP ME?
MY ADRES IS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we can speak ther by mess..?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Howdy
>
> I'm new to this thread but not Solaris in general.
>
> I'm trying to get Solaris 10 jumpstart to work using
> a Linux server.
>
> The big problem I have is the apparent compatibility
> issues between Linux (2.6 kernel, tried both Fedora
> core 4 and 6) NFS version 4 (nfs-utils 1.0.7-
>which tells me my cpio flag's not set right, etc.
>
>Any quick clues on what's the best way to zip the miniroot back up into usable
>form?
It needs to be a ufs image; so not packed with cpio.
Steps are:
- gunzip
- lofiadm the resulting file
- mount
- make chang
28 matches
Mail list logo
