Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread John
Ken, That is pretty much my impression as well, that even SXCE is a walking dead man. I am okay with the SXDE/SXCE branches getting pruned as long as Sun provides a method to live upgrade from them to OpenSolaris. If they fail to do that, then SXDE/SXCE users were abandoned. The machine with

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread Shawn Walker
John wrote: Ken, That is pretty much my impression as well, that even SXCE is a walking dead man. I am okay with the SXDE/SXCE branches getting pruned as long as Sun provides a method to live upgrade from them to OpenSolaris. If they fail to do that, then SXDE/SXCE users were abandoned.

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread James Carlson
John writes: I don't know why we all need to speculate on what is going to happen on SXDE, SXCE, and opensolaris. Is it too much to ask for somebody in charge to build a development roadmap that is both accurate, detailed (with real dates), and maintained? Even if SXCE and openSolaris

Re: [osol-discuss] LU doesn't work with ZFS - replacement beadm for lucreate luupgrade?

2008-08-20 Thread John Brewer
LU effectively disappears in the OpenSolaris distribution (replaced by 'beadm' and IPS snap upgrades), so that's mostly a no. When will beadm show up on Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris snv_bxx and does this impact thel support of lucreate and luupgrade commands? Also will OpenSolaris 2008.05 LiveCD

Re: [osol-discuss] LU doesn't work with ZFS - replacement beadm for lucreate luupgrade?

2008-08-20 Thread James Carlson
John Brewer writes: LU effectively disappears in the OpenSolaris distribution (replaced by 'beadm' and IPS snap upgrades), so that's mostly a no. When will beadm show up on Solaris 10 Never, I expect. and OpenSolaris snv_bxx It's there now. It's been there for some time in the OpenSolaris

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread andrew
This confusion is why I added this to my own Solaris mini-site: What is opensolaris? Opensolaris is three things: 1. A codebase that consists of most of Sun Solaris. (Some elements which could not be open-sourced are not

[osol-discuss] I need password

2008-08-20 Thread Eddy Diaz
I need to know to the code or password of maintenance administrator since the install program asks for me and not it encounter by no side. Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread john kroll
OK , opensolaris distribution project indiana evolved from and now replaces sxde [opensolaris.com]. Its here to stay.? Solaris express project nevada sxce is now in limited release or will go away [opensolaris.org].?? Did sun have a release which belenix, martux mbe, nexentaos,and schillix

[osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Matt Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get coloured syntax highlighting working in vim, and after a lot of work it looks like i'm going to have to compile my own vim, using ncurses. Ncurses requires math.h but I can't find which package provides it. A pointer to the package

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE

2008-08-20 Thread Glynn Foster
On 21/08/2008, at 10:59 AM, john kroll wrote: OK , opensolaris distribution project indiana evolved from and now replaces sxde [opensolaris.com]. Its here to stay.? Solaris express project nevada sxce is now in limited release or will go away [opensolaris.org].?? At some stage in the

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Matt Harrison
I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. Thanks Matt ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Matt Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. I have the following in my .vimrc: :if has(terminfo) : set t_Co=8

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Matt Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get coloured syntax highlighting working in vim, and after a lot of work it looks like i'm going to have to compile my own vim, using ncurses. You don't mention what OS you're trying to

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Matt Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. Works just fine for me on SXCE 92 (and thus it should work just fine on 95). I'm setting

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Matt Harrison
Mike Gerdts wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Matt Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. I have the following in my .vimrc: :if

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Matt Harrison
Glenn Lagasse wrote: * Matt Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. Works just fine for me on SXCE 92 (and thus it should work just fine on

Re: [osol-discuss] which package provides math.h?

2008-08-20 Thread Glenn Lagasse
* Matt Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Glenn Lagasse wrote: * Matt Harrison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I probably should have mentioned, I'm running SXCE (snv_95). I've tried all the TERM=xtermc, TERM=xterm-color stuff, and I'm still in black and white. Works just fine for me on SXCE

[osol-discuss] Where can I get a 64 bit gcc binary package?

2008-08-20 Thread Alfred Monticello
The one in /opt/sfw can produce 64bit code but is a 32bit binary. I couldn't get a later version to compile, or if I did, it complained about not being able to produce 64bit code even though the binary was 64bit. Anybody have this package or can tar it up and be willing to share? Or can give