Re: [osol-discuss] OS 2009.06: devfsadmd issue/SATA/ICH7R (failed to lookup dev name for ...)

2010-09-03 Thread Jerry Sutton
I don't have any silver bullets here but I have a couple of suggestions. My experience is on junk hardware with Solaris 10 at home and a variety of small to large sparc hardware running Solaris 9 or Solaris 10 at work. First, drop into the BIOS setup menu and make sure all the SATA ports can be a

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+ available

2010-09-03 Thread Gary Mills
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:20:13AM +0200, casper@sun.com wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >> SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle. > >> This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks. > >> > >> see: ftp://ftp.

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 134 NIS server

2010-09-03 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mike DeMarco wrote: > Am I missing something or has NIS server been pulled from build 134? Perhaps you need to: pkg install service/network/nis -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ ___ opensolaris-discuss maili

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 134 NIS server

2010-09-03 Thread Mike DeMarco
Never mind: Just after post I checked the repository and found it. Sorry -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Build 134 NIS server

2010-09-03 Thread Mike DeMarco
Am I missing something or has NIS server been pulled from build 134? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] OS 2009.06: devfsadmd issue/SATA/ICH7R (failed to lookup dev name for ...)

2010-09-03 Thread Karel Gardas
I also need to add, that inbetween of unconfigure/disconnect/connect/configure cycle I've also added several invocations of devfsadm -C -- which might be perhaps the right reason I've lost the disk for sata0/3 which was presented before. I don't remember well, but the new drive which was identi

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Blade 2500 and OpenSolaris

2010-09-03 Thread Rainer Orth
Erik Trimble writes: > Also, with the removal of the Xsun driver from OpenSolaris, there are no > drivers for most SPARC graphics cards. > > Graphics on SPARC is hard under OpenSolaris. > > :-( But fortunately still doable: I've finally upgraded my Blade 1500 with XVR-600 from SX:CE build 130

Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Blade 2500 and OpenSolaris

2010-09-03 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
Solaris 10 should at least support the graphics card. I guess it depends what you want to do with the machine. You should be able to use non-Sun-branded RAM and harddrives. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris ARC is Dead

2010-09-03 Thread Florian Manschwetus
Am 03.09.2010 17:09, schrieb Gaiseric Vandal: > I have worked with Solaris 10, various Solaris Express Community Edition > Releases (Nevada, which for a while came out every two weeks) as well as > OpenSolaris (indiana?, which came out every several months.) > > The appeal big appeal of OpenSola

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris ARC is Dead

2010-09-03 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
I have worked with Solaris 10, various Solaris Express Community Edition Releases (Nevada, which for a while came out every two weeks) as well as OpenSolaris (indiana?, which came out every several months.) The appeal big appeal of OpenSolaris was that it provided some of the functionality of S

Re: [osol-discuss] OS 2009.06: devfsadmd issue/SATA/ICH7R (failed to lookup dev name for ...)

2010-09-03 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, to put this information into context. I guess when I booted with both new drives attached for the first time fmd complained about some issue and then one of the two drives was not present in cfgadm list. I suspected bad SATA cable so I powered off and replace the cable and the booted aga

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris ARC is Dead

2010-09-03 Thread usafverteran
Face the fact that OpenSolaris is dead and has been since March 2010. Either get behind Solaris 10 and its heir apparent, or find another operating system besides Solaris-based. The reason OpenSolaris had as large a user base and downloads as it did was because Sun supported a binary release.

[osol-discuss] OS 2009.06: devfsadmd issue/SATA/ICH7R (failed to lookup dev name for ...)

2010-09-03 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, I'm currently trying to grow my rpool mirror by replacing old drives with new drives. To my surprise when I connected both new drives and booted just one showed in cfgadm. I've tested to unconfigure/disconnect/connect/configure the not-shown drive but nothing happen. I've tested the same

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+ available

2010-09-03 Thread Casper . Dik
>On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle. >> This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks. >> >> see: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix > >I just tried booting this image on my Acer Aspire AspireAS3

Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+ available

2010-09-03 Thread Gary Mills
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle. > This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks. > > see: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix I just tried booting this image on my Acer Aspire AspireAS3810T-68