On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Well...Solaris 11 express support for production use will be made available
under the Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems program, maybe those
who are enrolled will have access to the source code. maybe not.
For awhile, some MySQL
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Blake
davidblakeaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time to fork. Solaris and it's descendants should stay with
it's
.
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the
OurDelta or MariaDB equivalent of Oracle Solaris and
outshine its predecessor. :)
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
maybe illumos/openindiana are
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:57 AM, Knut Reinert wrote:
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time to fork. Solaris and it's descendants should stay with
it's SystemV heritage and POSIX.
How do BSD or System V have anything to do with POSIX or Single UNIX
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the OurDelta or MariaDB equivalent
of Oracle Solaris and outshine its predecessor. :)
I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
(http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173478) that
Oracle Solaris 11 is scheduled to contain more than 2,700
Btw, at http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173478 :
The first Oracle Solaris 11 Express release, expected by the end of calendar
year 2010, will provide customers with timely access to the latest Oracle
Solaris 11 Express features with an optional Oracle support agreement. This
release
They say that support agreement is *optional* for
Solaris 11 Express.
the battle of the articles;-)
it may be optional but according to a few oracle sites it appears updates
will only be available
to whom is enrolled in the Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems
offering.
On 09/22/10 07:57 PM, Knut Reinert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Blake
davidblakeaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time to fork.
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Well...Solaris 11 express support for production use will be made
available under the Oracle Premier Support for Operating Systems
program, maybe those who are enrolled will have access to the source
code. maybe not.
Sol 11 Express is open source for everyone.
Edward Martinez wrote:
well... if it happens that updates won't be made available to
end-users,devs, etc unless we are enrolled in the Oracle Premier Support for
Operating Systems offering then that is one main feature we lost we had a
new opensolaris /dev build; updated software. i
On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:24 AM, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
Can Illumos developers spend 20 million person hours of development?
There's much to be said for quality versus quantity. ;)
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Dmitry G. Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com wrote:
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the OurDelta or MariaDB
equivalent of Oracle Solaris and outshine its predecessor. :)
I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
(http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173478) that
Oracle
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:57 +0200, Knut Reinert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Blake
davidblakeaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:24, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the OurDelta or MariaDB
equivalent of Oracle Solaris and outshine its predecessor. :)
I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
(http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173478) that
Jorg
When can we expect SchilliX-0.7.1i+ to be made available to download?
Regards
Edward
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Did Oracle really spend 1 man years?
Yes, I ask myself the same question :)
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 22 September 2010 10:22, Gary Driggs gdri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:57 AM, Knut Reinert wrote:
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time to fork. Solaris and it's descendants should stay with
it's SystemV heritage and POSIX.
How
Given that the development metric quoted there is the cumulative historic
investment in the existing code-base, Illumos would probably be just as
justified as Oracle in making the same claim.
Agreed. 20 million hours cannot refer to (Open)Solaris 10 - 11 improvements.
- Dmitry.
--
This
Du (Dmitry G. Kozhinov) schreibst:
Did Oracle really spend 1 man years?
Yes, I ask myself the same question :)
- Dmitry.
Solaris, as we know it now, is based and naturally derived from
SunOS... (which was BSD). So, after 28 years of SunOS (Solaris itself
internally still calls itself
On 22 September 2010 12:06, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:57 PM, Knut Reinert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Blake
davidblakeaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?
Given the ongoing BSD'tification
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:20 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 12:06, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:57 PM, Knut Reinert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Blake
davidblakeaus...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
is anyone planning an
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:30 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 14:25, Garrett D'Amore garr...@damore.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:20 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 12:06, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 09/22/10 07:57 PM, Knut Reinert
On 9/22/2010 5:02 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 10:22, Gary Driggsgdri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:57 AM, Knut Reinert wrote:
Given the ongoing BSD'tification of Illumos userland utilities I'd say
it may be time to fork. Solaris and it's descendants should
Frankly, I don't see why none of the forks/sporks/distros floating
around are looking at the modernized, more-featureful versions of the
System V tools available from the Heirloom Tools project. IIRC, most
of them are even CDDL-licensed (as OpenSolaris code was a starting
point for most of them)
On 22 September 2010 14:43, Michael Kerpan mjker...@kerpan.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't see why none of the forks/sporks/distros floating
around are looking at the modernized, more-featureful versions of the
System V tools available from the Heirloom Tools project. IIRC, most
of them are even
Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
When can we expect SchilliX-0.7.1i+ to be made available to download?
There will be a self hosting SchilliX-0.7.2 tomorrow (in case there are no
problems). This will be based on the same kernel as seen in 0.7.1i.
During the past time, I compiled a
On 9/22/2010 6:00 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 14:43, Michael Kerpanmjker...@kerpan.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't see why none of the forks/sporks/distros floating
around are looking at the modernized, more-featureful versions of the
System V tools available from the Heirloom
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Dmitry G. Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com wrote:
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the OurDelta or MariaDB
equivalent of Oracle Solaris and outshine its predecessor. :)
I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@damore.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:30 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 14:25, Garrett D'Amore garr...@damore.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:20 +0200, Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 22 September 2010 12:06, Ian
On Sep 22, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Cedric Blancher wrote:
This is news for me. Could you point me to the opengroup page which
lists FreeBSD, NetBSD or any other BSD operating system except Apple
OS X as SUS certified?
Apple is the only one that can afford to pay for it but that means Darwin is as
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Dmitry G. Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com wrote:
So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the
OurDelta or MariaDB equivalent of Oracle Solaris and
outshine its predecessor. :)
I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
what's new in the latest release of Oracle Solaris
10!
http://blogs.sun.com/OTNGarage/date/20100908
Oracle upgrades Solaris with Sun Solaris 10 9/10
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/eye-on-oracl
e/oracle-upgrades-solaris-with-sun-solaris-10-910/
Download link:
what's new in the latest release of Oracle Solaris
10!
http://blogs.sun.com/OTNGarage/date/20100908
Oracle upgrades Solaris with Sun Solaris 10 9/10
http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/eye-on-oracl
e/oracle-upgrades-solaris-with-sun-solaris-10-910/
Download link:
With no moving parts and no local operating system to manage, Sun Ray Clients
provide a cost-effective, highly functional thin client alternative to desktop
and laptop computers and reduce many of the problems associated with
traditional desktop deployments.
a
I want to sue God for being too busy and unresponsive. How can I file a
lawsuit against Him at the United States Supreme Court?
--
Yours sincerely,
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩鸣 Dip(Mechatronics)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Citizenship: Singapore Citizen/Singaporean
Alma Maters:
I had the same problem, with snv_147. The fix is to append the following line
to this file: /usr/X11/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias:
fixed -misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso10646-1
Ref: http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5430180
- Dan Anderson
--
This message
36 matches
Mail list logo
