Re: [osol-discuss] Minimal Install of OpenSolaris 2008.05

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
No, there isn't any timeframe, not even a specific plan at this point. If you really want it, contributing code to do it is the way to make it happen. If you just want someone else to do it, then you're beholden to other priorities that might be coming along. This is definitely

Re: [osol-discuss] I don't get it....

2008-05-21 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 08:33 -0700, MC wrote: While I'm all for fast, stable operating systems, this is 2008, there should be no excuse for not having even basic GUI interfaces for your installed hardware, drivers, versions, etc. Can SUN not even do that? I'm amazed. Basically the

Re: [osol-discuss] Right.... fetchmail, postfix/Qmail. IMAP.. but how?

2008-04-09 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
We're using the Blastwave versions of Postfix and Cyrus IMAP in production on Nevada - but use the stable repo for Postfix if you want it to use SMTP AUTH as the most recent version in unstable only has support for Dovecot SASL compiled in (no use unless you're running Dovecot imapd). Chris On

Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone got Solaris running on a HP DL320s?

2008-03-07 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Official statement regarding Solaris support from hp: http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/software/solaris/index.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN Note that DL320 is not on the list: Solaris on ProLiant - certified supported versions:

Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone got Solaris running on a HP DL320s?

2008-03-07 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
UNIX admin wrote: I was hoping that it might work nevertheless - we've been using an 8 core Proliant DL140 G3 with snv_66 for some time with excellent results on a range of workloads. hp doesn't have try before you buy? Not for this level of machine on any channels available to me,

[osol-discuss] Anyone got Solaris running on a HP DL320s?

2008-03-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
We're looking at potentially getting this [1] or similar for a fileserver, but I can't find any conclusive data on whether Solaris will run on it. Running a fileserver without ZFS is not an option, so this would be a deal-breaker. There was a thread on this several months ago but it petered out

Re: [osol-discuss] LDAP server

2008-03-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 23:22 -0800, Edwin Goei wrote: In particular, I'm looking for binary packages for an LDAP server that runs on opensolaris sparc mainly, though x86 may also be useful. -Edwin Blastwave's openldap package has been provided one of the longest-running and most trouble-free

Re: [osol-discuss] Indiana help

2008-03-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 21:12 +1100, Kamal Bhatt wrote: Hi, I am new to OpenSolaris. I installed OpenSolaris (dev preview 2) using VirtualBox (on Vista) and got my network card to work by using the AE drivers (basically followed the instructions here:

Re: [osol-discuss] Long usernames greater than 8 chars

2008-02-25 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Thanks for the info. The reason I need more than 8 characters is because I would like to operate a mercurial repository over ssh. The current user database has usernames that are 32 chars max and each user would have their own unix login for ssh. Sites like sourcefourge allow longer

Re: [osol-discuss] Definition of project/community success

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
It *is* your affair. You do work for Sun right ? If you do then you *must* always be focused on doing good business first. And by any meaning ful definition a good business is one with a good cashflow. This is an open engineering community. We care about some of the same things that

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-08 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
It's actually pdksh, wh/was +/- based off of ksh88, w/Korn's blessings, from back in day when ATT was less amenable to open source licenses. On Solaris /bin/ksh is ksh88+ If pdksh is compatible with the existing /sbin/sh, why not use that as its replacement? I've been using OpenBSD for a

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-08 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
This test _only_ checks for one small and single aspect of POSIX vs. Bourne compatibility. If you find a program like pdksh that intends to be POSIX compatible to return Bourne with this test, it only proves that this shell needs a major rewrite to become POSIX compliant. But the consensus

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-08 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
stty erase ^h Not followed the whole discussion but above does not work? It does - that's just made my Friday - cheers. Now for tab completion and editable command history.. :) Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
fwiw; # uname -s OpenBSD # crontab -l|grep -i shell SHELL=/bin/sh # grep ^root /etc/passwd |cut -d : -f 1,7 root:/bin/ksh # uname -a OpenBSD wiggum.firebox.com 4.2 GENERIC#375 i386 # md5 /bin/sh MD5 (/bin/sh) = 266304e942a721b73f0c226681a3209d # md5 /bin/ksh MD5 (/bin/ksh) =

Re: [osol-discuss] How to edit files inside a ISO-image?

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 06:08 -0800, Roman Morokutti wrote: Hi, I am stuck on how to patch an install image which is currently an ISO-image with bits that support a ZFS root. The problem is that after mounting the ISO-file the mount directory is read-only. Every attempt to make it writable

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 15:35 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a plan to create complatibility to /bin/ksh which is based on ksh88. /bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne Shell. I know that; but the version

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Chris Linton-Ford writes: It might be helpful to consider the shells' dual nature as a) a scripting medium and b) an interactive environment. Surely there is no engineering reason why a shell could not be coded to have only a strict superset of /sbin/sh's commands, thus making scripts

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-04 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 13:51 -0800, Dr. Robert Pasken wrote: From the Project Indiana description on sun's web site Planned as an open source binary distribution of OpenSolaris, Project Indiana is expected to create a user base and grow mindshare for OpenSolaris by combining [b]what people

Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS performance issues on filesystem which *used* to have large number

2008-02-04 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:33 +, Chris Linton-Ford wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:21 -0800, Mike DeMarco wrote: Have you tried to do a zpool scrub ? Yes - no joy, completed without errors but didn't fix the problem. The zdb command slowed the entire server down too much, so

Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-announce] No update on SXCE Build 79

2008-02-04 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
I think he may want that, bu the claims he is NOT getting that from Linux; specifically the fact that installing one package causes half the system to be upgraded and parts to be crippled. Totally agree - this is exactly what happened recently on a Linux server I know of. But to say that the

Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS performance issues on filesystem which *used* to have large number

2008-02-01 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Linton-Ford Systems Administrator Firebox.com t: 0870 420 4475 f: 0870 220 2178 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Company number: 3874477 Company registered address: 41 Welbeck Street London W1M 8HD ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] ZFS performance issues on filesystem which *used* to have large numbers of files

2008-01-31 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Hi all, I've recently cleared out a directory on a ZFS filesystem that had ~2 million files in it. Even after clearing out, listing the directory takes in the order of two minutes. I thought it might be something to do with the fact that the files were still being held in snapshots of the the

[osol-discuss] Adding public key to profile on opensolaris.org

2008-01-03 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
in the standard OpenSSH ssh-rsa .. ..== comment format, but I haven't seen any formats that would match the above regex. Cheers, Chris Chris Linton-Ford Systems Administrator Firebox.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] uname -a shows i386 on 64 bit capable system

2007-12-20 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 08:10 -0800, Roman Morokutti wrote: Hi, I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a strange problem when I type this command: uname -a It shows: SunOS solar-star 5.11

Re: [osol-discuss] SXDE 0907 installation problem on Acer Aspire 5630

2007-11-26 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 15:49 -0800, Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote: Some acers have a buggy bios. SXDE is based off an older build, so it might have some problems. Try this link: http://blogs.sun.com/danasblog/date/20050614 This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris Express Community Edition download failing

2007-11-25 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Andrei Maxim wrote: The servers were in maintenance mode until a couple of hours ago. It seems that they are back online right now (I'm downloading SXDE right now). SXDE's fine - it's just CE that's playing up (CD and DVD). Chris ___

[osol-discuss] SXDE 0907 installation problem on Acer Apire 5630

2007-11-25 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Hi all, I'm having problems installing SXDE 9/07 on a spare primary partition on a new Aspire 5630. The installer gets as far as the initial Configuring /dev and then hangs. All the devices on the laptop are supposed to be supported, according to the Device Detection Tool, except the audio

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris Express Community Edition download failing

2007-11-25 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Cyril Plisko wrote: On Nov 25, 2007 1:27 PM, Chris Linton-Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrei Maxim wrote: The servers were in maintenance mode until a couple of hours ago. It seems that they are back online right now (I'm downloading SXDE right now). SXDE's fine - it's just CE that's

Re: [osol-discuss] DL385 hangs after 90 minutes with B66

2007-08-07 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:00 +0100, Gavin Maltby wrote: Could you try one more experiment, please. Leave the Solaris /etc/system setting below to stop us enabling the scrubber, but look for the BIOS option (if any) to enable dram scrubbing. Note what it is set to before changing it, and then

Re: [osol-discuss] DL385 hangs after 90 minutes with B66

2007-08-06 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Apologies for the delay in replying - our fileserver died a grisly death on Friday afternoon. Could you do the following for me, please: 0) In your BIOS options look for an option to remap/reclaim the dram hole, and if it is offering a choice of software vs hardware remapping select

[osol-discuss] DL385 hangs after 90 minutes with B66

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
Hi all, I am trying to get SXCR B66 running on an HP DL385 G1 with 3x300G disks on a Smart Array 6i controller. I have managed to get the operating system installed several times; I use the HP-supplied CPQary3 drivers and the system appears to install fine. The only slight wrinkle is that the

Re: [osol-discuss] DL385 hangs after 90 minutes with B66

2007-08-02 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:22 +0100, Gavin Maltby wrote: On 08/02/07 15:31, Boyd Adamson wrote: Chris Linton-Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I am trying to get SXCR B66 running on an HP DL385 G1 with 3x300G disks on a Smart Array 6i controller. I have managed to get

Re: [osol-discuss] SMTP AUTH in sendmail

2007-06-30 Thread Chris Linton-Ford
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 15:33 -0700, John Beck wrote: Christopher I am trying to configure sendmail on SXDE to send mail through Christopher an authenticated SMTP relay (owned by my ISP). Christopher I have been following this: Christopher http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/auth.html which