, but if someone has a memory
> or two of how they got Solaris 8 to work on a Dell Power edge 4300 or
> similar hardware it would be really appreciated.
As I said before, get the Solaris Driver, create the DU diskette, and load
it when prompted to add a driver. That's pretty much it.
to do the same again at the end of the installation before
you reboot.
I built a lot of systems like that, but it's been the best part of a decade
since I did the last one. Good luck.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
__
ok at the historical development
of the naming scheme, but I think you're trying to read to much into this.
There are separate names for different purposes.
Just use p* from fdisk.
Just use s* to refer to Solaris slices.
Just use d0 for zfs to refer to the whole drive.
--
-Peter Trib
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
>> From: Peter Tribble [mailto:peter.trib...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 8:38 AM
>>
>> (Hint: install the Hardware Management Pack
>> and then you can get everything from the Storage tab in the
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
>> From: Peter Tribble [mailto:peter.trib...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 8:38 AM
>>
>> That often happens. It shouldn't matter. If the d0 node doesn't exist,
>> then
>> telling zf
tc, and wipe out
> the first disk. Boot from the 2nd disk. Then re-partition the first disk
> the same as the 2nd disk and start mirroring. This sounds like a pointless
> hassle that must be avoidable SOME how.
>
>
>
> ;-) Thanks for any answers/info/suggestions.
>
> __
much slower speeds - 3MB/s at best sounds about
right. And I hung the machine I was using several times, so pretty much gave
up on that idea.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
the things that might be called OpenSolaris). Sun and
now Oracle could never get this right, there's no point expecting
journalists to do so.
Sometimes I've wondered whether we need a debunking project to
dissect articles like this. Mind you, it would just be a lot easier if Or
uous stream you either wait for a gap (the upload stops or the
overall change finishes, for example) or say you don't wait longer than
N seconds.
The talk will be placed here shortly, I expect:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/User+Group+losug/v-2010
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.pet
rking
on something else, all transparently. (As it were...)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
So the OGB would have to violate its own rules and act contrary to
what we were elected for. Again, the OGB would really have to quit
the current system and reform in some other guise, or new people
could start afresh.
For all this, anybody could have done it over the past 5 years o
htly worrying.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
he OGB. Even the (limited)
contact with User Groups has really been an end-run around our
community governance structures.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
're talking about the community (and associated project).
We're not (directly) talking about the codebase, or about any commercial
products that happen to have the same name.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is better to wait after the OpenWorld show to dissolve, who
> knows they may have a surprise.
Why wait? It just drags out the deception even longer.
What we're in need of here is openness and engagement. Relying
on a marketing surprise is entirely counter to that.
--
-Peter Tribble
http
t people can just pick one and use that as a base.
> I haven't used sol/osol for wifi. Does it have a good wifi utility for
> joining networks?
I have a couple of laptops. OpenSolaris just works, flawlessly, on the
one - much better than either Windows or Linux do. On the other,
it kinda
op of OpenSolaris?
VirtualBox
www.virtualbox.org
(Oh. Wait. It's GPL licensed. But it works extremely well.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
sary to shout it from the rooftops all the time.)
> It is two months past the release date for 03.2010 and not a word.
It is not any time since the release date, because the published release
date is "first half of calendar year 2010", ie, before the end of
cuss bcc'ed so they see this but
don't have to see any ensuing procedural minutiae.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on with the community that many would like. You, though,
seem to have privileged access to information that's not available to the
rest of the community - perhaps you would like to share that with us?
Or are you scaremongering based on incomplete (or no) data?
--
-Peter Tribble
h
nning than we
are to its present state.
Fedora is now quite successful, but it wasn't an easy ride. If that is a
valuable model to consider, how do we get to that from where we are now?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - htt
way decent Linux distro again.
Ugh. OpenSolaris isn't *that* bad.
> I know it's open source but will OpenSolaris die off soon through lack of
> interest/funding, whatever, or can I get interested in that?
>
> Am I the only one who feels this way about Sun Microsystems &
to questions that
have already been answered officially isn't helping anybody.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ted configuration, you can just guess at what it
looks like, metainit, and try accessing it read-only to see if you've done
it right.
(Of course, if it was a metaset, then just metaimport it. If the metassist
command was used originally, then you'll be dealing with
It's not all doom and gloom.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/27/compellent_znas/
Pretty much a ringing endorsement of ZFS and Nexenta.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-di
better that is
worth the damage down by a fork?
(I can see different technical decisions as being valid drivers for going
along an alternative path. But I think you need to clearly formulate your
goals before deciding how to implement your strategy.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertri
bsolutely clear public commitments that there will be
a release, and the only official statement on the date I've seen is that it
will be in the first half of calendar year 2010. (If people have been paying
attention they may have seen the term 2010.H1 used in places.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
se utilities are reliant on the hardware and bios
actually reporting data back, which is somewhat variable in
both quantity and quality.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
rd OpenSolaris will NOT have all packages
> from Solaris prime.
That's always been the case since the OpenSolaris distribution was created
over 2 years ago. Again, nothing new, unless you're referring to or know
something different.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - h
d(procfd, &psi, sizeof(psinfo_t)) < 0)
{
perror("read");
return -1;
}
printf("arg vector addr: %d\n", psi.pr_argv);
printf("cmd line: %s\n", psi.pr_psargs);
close(procfd);
return 0;
}
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
m
IRC logs here, where you can see the whole chat verbatim:
http://www.spcoast.com/irclogs/opensolaris-meeting/index.php
Look just after 12 noon on the 26th of Feb.
(I assume "TechJournalist" on the chat is the author of the above articles.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribb
n. (I turn pretty much everything
off, which makes life noticeably quicker.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Nawrocki
> wrote:
>> Uh oh... slashdot is claiming that the writing is on the wall for
>> OpenSolaris.
>
> They've been doing that for 5 years. We're still here.
row.
(#opensolaris-meeting on freenode)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ly to me (Peter Tribble).
--
-Peter Tribble
Vice-Chair, OpenSolaris Governing Board
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
tduu SUNWftdur
and if you get two lines back, they're already installed.
But that's a pretty old version, you know?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
nunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2009/009
some commentary:
http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2009/009_ReleaseNotes
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
7;t expect business as usual. I would imagine that Oracle
have a different philosophy and different goals, and that the shape of
OpenSolaris and the community around it will change and adapt to fit
that world. So what I want to know is what shape will the overall
OpenSolaris family take in this
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Orvar Korvar
wrote:
> What happens to JavaFX?
Well, they talked about that. See, for example, a summary here:
http://learnjavafx.typepad.com/weblog/2010/01/oracle-we-will-invest-heavily-in-javafx.html
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - h
months to plan and to get everything in order.
I wonder if they actually worked on the changes a while back. If you
look at the x64 and CMT server pages, they list several systems that
I thought had disappeared and I'm sure are EOL, such as the T1000,
X2200, X4150, and Ultra 24.
--
-Peter T
7.1 specifically (I'm running 1.6.3) but according
to my notes, just deleting the two lines it complains about in uuid.h
was enough to get pidgin-sipe working for me.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
where).
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/aalok/entry/automated_installer_from_media
That gets round the wanboot limitation, so you can boot, but does it
include the packages or do you need a repository? And if the latter,
where do you get the repository iso from?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>> But that problem arises not because SVR4 packaging supports scripting
>> but because it only does so badly. What's needed is:
>>
>> 1. For the packaging system to fully su
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>
>> IPS ought to do this right, and is pretty much there because it actually
>> does have the framework to do everything correctly, but claims that
>> scripting is forbidden and therefore
e it actually
does have the framework to do everything correctly, but claims that
scripting is forbidden and therefore doesn't provide the public hooks,
again forcing every script writer into carrying the responsibility themselves.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptri
;s a huge
difference. In one case the packaging system can help the admin
by telling you that there's a problem, and even let you clamber out
of the hole you've landed in. In the other case you have a system
that's broken and have no hope of diagnosing or fixing it.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Shawn Walker
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a " pkginfo -q" equivalent in
yourself is common practice. In
this case looking to see if a package is listed in /var/pkg/pkg, or actually
running pkginfo, becomes a likely source of cheating.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
he site need to make sure their content is good.
(Opportunity for evaluation of opportunities for improvement as well,
I suspect.)
Some are simple bugs, and people need to report those.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
retty specific, so you'll need to be more precise
in what you're after.
To receive, you need to get a trap receiver running. Out of the box
on Solaris 10, you can run snmptrapd and have that listening for
snmp traps. Or go to opennms.org and download and install OpenNMS
which i
g like:
ipmitool sensor list
On sparc, I begin with
prtpicl -c temperature-sensor -v
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Brock Pytlik wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Darren J Moffat
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> # ptime pkgadd SUNWzsh
>>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
>>
>> # ptime pkgadd SUNWzsh
>>
>> real 2.390
>> user 0.808
>> sys 1.380
>
> That I assume was local disk, right ?
Yup. But http over the network isn't that dif
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:27 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:21:18PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
>> It's not just search that's slow - most pkg operations feel slow.
>
> How about providing some data instead of wild accusations?
>
> I can instal
de it faster
than grep in some cases, and not much slower for most, and that supported
a much richer search syntax (it got stuck on wondering whether to use shell
glob patterns or string REs). Other SVR4 operations could be sped up
significantly as well.
Are there performance targets f
27;t active, pruning should be
considered a healthy part of community development.
--
-Peter Tribble
OGB Vice-Chair
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
x27;anything' requires essentially arbitrary scripting. First you
tell us that arbitrary scripting will never be allowed, then you tell us that
it's necessary, but we all have to implement our own mechanisms to
get it.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ject Members:
>
> Need 5 or more initial members, they will become Core Contributors.
>
> o Facilitator:
>
> Need 1 facilitator.
Nit: Core contributors and Facilitators apply to communities, not projects,
so that wouldn't apply.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co
et alone deployment.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
where packaging comes
into play. Sometimes you just want the thing to be dumb.
Software integrated with the OS is packaged; no doubt about that though.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discu
t isn't designed
as a livecd.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ll presentations, we would like to
know about that too; and if there's something you already have there's
no need to create something new.
Some templates you may wish to use are available at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/Reports/
Please reply directly to me (Peter Tri
. Is there a better way to achive that? Or what am I missing
> here?
You're missing sharing it with root access.
zfs set sharenfs="rw=192.168.36.39,root=192.168.36.39" backup/192.168.36.39
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
y the file naming in that script and the
/usr/lib/sa/sa1 script.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t and mpstat are for the whole system,
unless you've allocated the zone to a processor set or have some other
resource controls applied to the zone. In particular, things like the load
average apply to the system as a whole.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co
; programs like Tivoli or HP-OpenView which don't support Solaris
> as well, but have reasonable support of many platforms.
For monitoring like that, would you want SunMC or Zabbix/Nagios/whatever?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
one to choose!). Put together a brief summary of the proposal
(see section 2.2 of the above document), and either send it to sysadmin-discuss
or to me and I'll push it through for you.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - ht
ite, but you can download it from the
project page:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/phpEasyTools/
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
bin/true (login fails).
>>>
>>> How can I dig deeper on this weird issue? This issue almost drives me crazy.
>>
>> What does the passwd entry in your /etc/nsswitch.conf file look like?
>>
>> (Are you using compat?)
>>
>> --
>> -Peter Tribbl
rather
> unstable. Sometimes it is /bin/tcsh (login is ok), sometimes it is
> /bin/true (login fails).
>
> How can I dig deeper on this weird issue? This issue almost drives me crazy.
What does the passwd entry in your /etc/nsswitch.conf file look like?
(Are you using compat?)
S packages, the pkg command gives you everything.
For SVR4 packages, you want pkginfo
For patches (which only apply to SVR4 packages) then you probably
want patchadd -p instead of showrev -p.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribb
ied this, and it works the way it should - if I have
entries in the hosts
file then I see no DNS lookups.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> above example will stop the search if it finds what it is looking for in
> files.
SUCCESS=return is the default behaviour. Or it should be - are you
saying that it's not?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ll find the vendor picking up the slack is eBay. You can
get quite decent
machines there - at least as good if not better than anything Sun have
been selling
new for the last couple of years - at quite acceptable prices.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.u
> driver without this feature.
Because IPS knows how to handle driver installation as
a first class operation without having to resort to postinstall
hackery. (As it understands how to handle other common
classes of object. that might be installed on a system.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http
configure, although we use
env CC=cc CXX=CC CXXFLAGS=-O CFLAGS=-O ./configure
to get it to go faster than the default build. And OpenSolaris
currently includes 6.3.4 I believe.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
__
d (yet anyway)...
Well, it already has Solaris - and if you're serious about servers then that's
a pretty solid choice.
They're now going after (or at least, they think they're trying to go after)
developers as well; time will tell if they can produce a new platform that
can bot
ly anything to stop you using it there if
you're happy to manage it.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
any of those tools to
work on Solaris. Especially ImageMagick - it's one of the most
crucial tools in our development environment now and it just
builds fine (although it takes a little tweak to get it optimized,
which is important when you run it millions of times a day).
-
at doesn't include the high rate of flapping
I encountered in airports, which tended to make the machine panic.)
http://ptribble.blogspot.com/2008/04/ndis-wrapper-on-indiana.html
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
that? Maybe having a
> bootable live cd or?
You don't say what sort of sparc hardware.
There was an upgrade CD in the Solaris 7 timeframe, but that would
obviously only work on systems of that era (generally, those that didn't
have 64-bit capable firmware and had to be upgraded to allow
esh copies. So if you make changes to
files that the packaging system hasn't marked as editable then those
changes show up in the local zones. I use this to modify the sample
nsswitch.* files to add dns for hostname resolution to the nis and
nisplus
ngst all zones. (You can have
different zones in different timezones, of course.)
I filed bug 6528655 to get a more useful usage message:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6528655
which I think is currently being fixed.
--
-Peter Tribble
htt
bers on
> opensolaris.org; I think that makes any result a passing fancy at
> best.
Well, it's got higher participation than many of the important discussions
that have been going on recently. (Assuming it's not the same half a dozen
people submitting mu
ndiana is trying to be (or is seen to be, or
is being marketed as) several different things at once and, apart
from the confusion that results, it could end up in a 'jack of all
trades, master of none' scenario.
So I think I would prefer to see a situation where a given release
focussed on o
k about it and look at what has been announced and
what's happening, the less clear it is to me what Indiana stands for.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
#x27;t have to deal with it any more.
It may well be that there are some features of inst that could teach
us how to do better. If that's the case, call them out so we can
learn from them.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk
gt; advanced operating system on the planet" to shame,
> >
> > Care to give some examples?
>
> Indeed I can, your "favorite": inst(1M)
I'm familiar with it. A shining example of how not to do it.
Something capable of tangling your installed software into
su
he
> statement you made above.
>
> Especially if we consider that IRIX still has technology that puts "the most
> advanced operating system on the planet" to shame,
Care to give some examples?
I've used and administered IRIX, and nothing immediately springs
to mind.
--
DM and start my standalone
version, then it picks up the images I've selected and downloads
them fine.
So, the SDLC is best described as broken at this time.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
on x86.)
Generally, code should just recompile without issues, and most of it
does.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ll access to the console using the network
management port, use "console -f".
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Open)Solaris fixed so that using
/usr/gnu like this is unnecessary, but I think that the current choice
is pretty reasonable in the circumstances.
(Even if the subtle incompatibilities it generates do drive me up
the wall!)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www
it's the positioning and rhetoric that
are coming from some quarters that worry me.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
cement. Just pkgrm the sendmail packages
and you're good to go.
The only other thing is that if you use the vacation feature then save
a copy of the vacation binary before you remove sendmail and put it
back manually.
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.p
6M. You'ld have trouble with gnome as currently
built (medialib bloats the running sizes quite a lot, but that could be
trimmed), and I certainly don't think you would enjoy running much
in the way of java or staroffice. Even firefox would be a problem if
you visited more than a few p
ne of the goals of project Indiana is to create a distribution that is
freely redistributable.)
> - can I promote OpenSolaris OS (and its logo - if any) in my website?
Oh yes. See:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/buttons/
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.
otherbotherbotherbotherbother.....
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ne for yourself.
Sadly most of the folks in my team are tea drinkers. :-(
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
avoid conflicts. (Using the project name as the last
component seems reasonable, as project names ought to be unique.)
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-di
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
