You must be talking to me...
Here is what I first did to get a bootable DVD:
http://blogs.sun.com/tdh/entry/kanigix_an_experiment_in_packaging4
You can look at earlier entries to find out what didn't work.
When I redid my steps a couple of months ago, I just followed this article...
This
David Clack wrote:
Hi,
So this is the interesting problem, what to actually expose.
On a server in a computer room or out in a telco CO, do you need sound ?
For the customers on the list for BlueWonder, it's not important.
Sound is not important until you are trying to hear POST code
David Clack wrote:
Hi,
No fans, no noise.
I really designed it for Solaris X86 and Real Time Java.
It's going to be the same price range as Siemens MicroPC 427b,
Bechoff, MPL or PDSI.
Just more ports of everything.
Dave
Any pictures online?
Joerg Schilling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cpio has a bug with hard link handling that will cause real problems
if you use the outdated mkisofs that currently comes with Solaris.
What kind of bug (it always works for me and makes the proper hardlinks)
Run
vinay simha bn wrote:
i installed solaris developer edition,when i give command gcc,shell shows gcc
not found but if i give man page i'l get man page of gcc and it's version is
3.4.3,so how to intsall gcc properly in solaris 10
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Tom Chen wrote:
Hello,
I have a IBM server that can install the latest Solaris Express without a
problem, however the graphics card is not good or fully compatible, menu
display looks too fuzzy. I want to use this server for remote testing at
console mode.
I am wondering how I can boot
Tom Chen wrote:
Thanks. But I just want to make the server stop at console login prompt and
let me input username and password, rather than showing Java desktop login
menu. I hope I don't need another PC to connect to its serial port . I do not
know how to modify the following boot script
Aaron Dailey wrote:
I'd like to propose Nigel Smith to be a core contributor in the
Opensolaris storage community. I've been impressed by his aid to the
community especially around iSCSI.
The voting procedures are here:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/governance/
We need a
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
seem
Tatyaso wrote:
What is the default NFS server version available on Solaris 10?
When I do rpcinfo it shows version3. Is it correct? How can I have NFS v4 on
Solaris?
# rpcinfo -u localhost nfs
program 13 version 2 ready and waiting
program 13 version 3 ready and waiting
--
Tatyaso
And this didn't make it to the list:
---BeginMessage---
Just as a followup to some email that Tatyaso and I had:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] rpcinfo -t localhost nfs
program 13 version 2 ready and waiting
program 13 version 3 ready and waiting
program 13 version 4 ready and waiting
Holger Berger wrote:
Ted, when will this project go public?
Holger
It just did this week, no?
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jim Walker wrote:
This would mean anyone who has signed the Sun Contributor Agreement
or is an employee of a company that has (ie. Sun).
I'm glad you brought this up. I'm working on establishing test
resources on opensolaris.org (ie. self-service testing and test farm),
and need a way to limit
Gary Peck wrote:
We were going to have user home directories be ZFS files systems, but found that the shutdown and startup times were to long with 15, ZFS file systems.
By the way, we've been addressing this serious scaling issue. Look at
Doug's blog entry:
Gary Peck wrote:
Thanks for the information. I was getting worried that I was going to have to
go back and ask my supervisors for money to by more memory. That would not
have been pretty.
Thanks,
Gary
This message posted from opensolaris.org
This is just a heads up that the OpenSolaris Storage community is seeking
discussion on a project wishlist. You can view and contribute to the thread on
the storage-discuss forum over here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=30269
This message posted from opensolaris.org
So I have the problem that when I blog, I might be doing it on
OpenSolaris, soccer coaching, science fiction, etc.
While that is good in that it shows I have interests outside of work, it
creates many threads of
conversation which it can be hard to navigate through.
I just recently learned
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Well in that case you're welcome is the correct response here
because I got there first and hit this wall and bashed my brains out
on trying to get that RTL8110SC based ethernet to work with the
available drivers.
So if you were thanking me for blowing the time energy and
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
While it's possible to go ping the engineer and that's valuable for
Dennis, it does nothing to raise the profile of the bug to Solaris
engineering, does it? How should a community member raise the profile
of a bug affecting them? email the engineer? email
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
This makes sense and I've had similar experiences myself. I guess the
reason I suggested it is there has been, historically, a
formal/scalable way to raise the profile on bugs affecting Solaris
that is not always well understood by people outside Sun.
email definitely
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Re : bug_id=6497363
How do I reach the engineer with this bug on his desk ?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6497363
Get the engineer's name from there and send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I leave it as an exercise to avoid spambots killing the engineer.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ted Pogue wrote:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to
the community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage
Archive Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
The project proposal draft being considered by the
Elton wrote:
I have setup a small (5 machines) development/test network using Solaris 10
11/06 (I know this is an OpenSolaris forum). I have an LDAP server configured
and running which also serves as the Home Directory Server.
The problem I have encountered is when users access there
Jürgen Keil wrote:
I've run across what appears to be a bug with Xorg on SXCE B61. While
installing Sun's web proxy 4.0.4, Xorg blew up, and kicked me out,
requiring me to login again. I'd seen similar behavior with the bundled Firefox,
but I was unable to reliably repeat it.
Did you
John Weekley wrote:
I've run across what appears to be a bug with Xorg on SXCE B61. While
installing Sun's web proxy 4.0.4, Xorg blew up, and kicked me out,
requiring me to login again.
I'd seen similar behavior with the bundled Firefox, but I was unable
to reliably repeat it. I downloaded
Glynn Foster wrote:
Please, if you are interested in mentoring a student or reviewing proposals this
summer, please join [EMAIL PROTECTED] or contact me directly. I'm not
going to mail opensolaris-discuss about it again. Please also feel free to
forward to interested sub-communities or
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Tom Haynes wrote:
One of the things throwing me is what do you (and the other emails
before this) mean
by join [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Do you want us to send email to
that address?
Are we supposed to subscribe to the list?
Yes, ideally. It'll be a forum
John Forte wrote:
The NWS project consists of drivers, libraries and utilities in support of
storage interconnect technologies including both Fibre Channel and iSCSI.
The NWS project source code has been available since 2/06, however, the project
does not have its own project page but rather
Erast Benson wrote:
So, could we assume that NWS now will not be delivered as a separated
tarball and will be part of ON tarball?
Or this is just an effort to get dedicated web page on opensolaris.org?
Erast,
You ask a good question. It isn't aimed as much to get a new project
page in
Robert Thurlow wrote:
I propose a new project that delivers the NFSv4 extensions for
Mirror Mounts, Referrals, and Replication Migration. This
project should be endorsed by the NFS community.
What's a mirror mount? It's a way to make the client automatically
mount filesystems from the same
project leaders:
Tom Haynes, Rob Thurlow
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
brad kelley wrote:
yes I had never done it before so hope i did it correctly.
I opened the file md5sumDVD-x86-list and printed the results
it showed 5 long numbers each corrosponding to one of the a-e zip files (again
from my first post I did not unzip these but there was a non zipped file
brad kelley wrote:
hmm can you suggest anything reliable...and no it can't be the solaris burning
tool.(unless you want to make me cry...) in the mean time I will fish
around the internet for linux burning tools...this k3b thing is not as free as
it advertises...I'm on my 7th dvd!
Description
In order to make the revival of UltraSPARC I support useful on non-1E
Ultra 1
systems, the le(7D) driver and its companions (ledma(7D), lebuffer(7D)) should
be revived as well.
...
* Revive the driver from old sources: I happen to have S9 sources via the
Solaris
Josh Hurst wrote:
You could make it a community phenomenon quite like Linux if you would
allow people to participate without waiting months to see the
submitted patches integrated. It sucks when a five line patch for a
very dumb bug is queued and no one cares. It sucks when projects like
the
Richard Lowe wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
You could make it a community phenomenon quite like Linux if you would
allow people to participate without waiting months to see the
submitted patches integrated. It sucks when a five line patch for a
very dumb bug is queued and no one
Stephen Lau wrote:
Tom Haynes wrote:
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed
binaries added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we
could automate pulling down the latest bits from the mecurial
repository and also getting the matching bits needed to do
Could we get links for the latest SUNWpro, SUNWonbld, and closed binaries
added? That way, instead of having to know the date, we could automate pulling
down the latest bits from the mecurial repository and also getting the matching
bits needed to do a full build.
That way, instead of doing
Just not obvious it is there.
The onbld is date stamped - we should still be able to get at the latest without
knowing the exact stamp.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James Carlson wrote:
But I think you have to be in the bad habit of logging in as root
first.
First time install will do that for you - there are no other users.
That gets you 19 entries in /
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know when the B56 sources will be released ? Seems that this
may be the version we'll pick for final code review of the
ksh93-integration tree...
Bye,
Roland
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
And
Solaris Express, Community
The proposal is to move the sharetab info out of /etc/dfs/sharetab
and into memory. Users can still get
to the data via a filesystem interface - think of the mnttab.
Problem Statement
The /etc/dfs/sharetab file is used to store the currently
shared exports. It contains all of the security
Seconded.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
44 matches
Mail list logo
