Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-15 Thread Peter Tribble
On 5/14/07, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Tribble wrote: Questions for the install community really: - do we have this sort of verbose and user-friendly descriptions available for packages? - would this go into the pkginfo file (I think this would be rather difficult)? -

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-14 Thread Dave Miner
Peter Tribble wrote: On 5/11/07, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That said, it is important to provide detailed package information. I don't know if a system is in place to provide a details section like you see in Synaptic ( http://people.ubuntulinux.org/~mako/docteam/images/synaptic-start.png

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-11 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
MC wrote: the SUNW is part of the package name, it's also what the pkg commands expect[s] But does that matter for a graphical app like this? I haven't used it yet, but almost every package having SUNW on the front in the GUI doesn't help me at all, I'm pretty sure.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-11 Thread Michal Pryc
MC wrote: So if we are displaying package names, display them as is. I actually agree with you. The unaltered package name should be one column. This type of tool is not one for inexperienced users to use, and the real package name combined with text search is exactly what is needed

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-11 Thread MC
So if we are displaying package names, display them as is. I actually agree with you. The unaltered package name should be one column. This type of tool is not one for inexperienced users to use, and the real package name combined with text search is exactly what is needed there. That

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack - install

2007-05-11 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
It's not specific to the packaging system. Users with the Software Installation profile can run pkgadd/pkgrm via pfexec, no root access needed. Are there Java equivalents to enough of the priv_*(3c) and *(3secdb) functions for a Java based GUI to be able to determine whether a

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack - install

2007-05-11 Thread Casper . Dik
It's not specific to the packaging system. Users with the Software Installation profile can run pkgadd/pkgrm via pfexec, no root access needed. Are there Java equivalents to enough of the priv_*(3c) and *(3secdb) functions for a Java based GUI to be able to determine whether a

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: [desktop-discuss] Re: New project: JPack -

2007-05-11 Thread Peter Tribble
On 5/11/07, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That said, it is important to provide detailed package information. I don't know if a system is in place to provide a details section like you see in Synaptic ( http://people.ubuntulinux.org/~mako/docteam/images/synaptic-start.png ), but there should