[osol-discuss] studio-11 solaris x86

2007-01-19 Thread Janardhan Molumuri
Hello all, Is libf77compat.so is available in studio-11 for solaris x86.? I see the library is available in studio-11 sparc version, but not in x86 version. From docs it seems f77 is deprecated and replaced with a wrapper script which invokee f90 in f77 mode. I am wondering why would the

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11 and ON builds revisited

2006-06-22 Thread Mike Sullivan
James C. Cotillier wrote: README.opensolaris version 1.46 is still clear that Studio 10 is the preferred compiler [presumably, as opposed to gcc]. My Studio 11 build of ON (20060619) running under snv_41 on an Intel P4 is breaking in a way similar to that of a discuss poster in November '05,

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11 and ON builds revisited

2006-06-22 Thread Glenn Lagasse
James C. Cotillier wrote: README.opensolaris version 1.46 is still clear that Studio 10 is the preferred compiler [presumably, as opposed to gcc]. My Studio 11 build of ON (20060619) running under snv_41 on an Intel P4 is breaking in a way similar to that of a discuss poster in November '05,

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-28 Thread Gavin Maltby
On 10/27/05 18:43, Mike Kupfer wrote: Bart The most important thing to do is to set your .make.machines file Bart to have an appropriate amount of parallelism. .make.machines is just for ParallelMake, though, right? I'm pretty near certain that dmake also looks at .make.machines. Unlike

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-28 Thread Mike Kupfer
Gavin == Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gavin I'm pretty near certain that dmake also looks at .make.machines. It looks like you're right. The man page doesn't say anything about it, but strings(1) does report %s/.make.machines mike ___

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-28 Thread Mike Sullivan
From: Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gavin == Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gavin I'm pretty near certain that dmake also looks at .make.machines. It looks like you're right. The man page doesn't say anything about it, but strings(1) does report %s/.make.machines And in any

[osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Sean Sprague
Hello all, LKR has recently told us about the record performance of Studio 11. I would very much like to cut down my current 12-hour+ build time for OpenSolaris (OK, I should buy some new H/W ;-) ); so when is Studio 11 going to be let loose on the OpenSolaris community? Real soon

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Casper . Dik
Hello all, LKR has recently told us about the record performance of Studio 11. I would very much like to cut down my current 12-hour+ build time for OpenSolaris (OK, I should buy some new H/W ;-) ); so when is Studio 11 going to be let loose on the OpenSolaris community? Real soon

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Kuldip Oberoi
Hi Sean, Stay tuned...we're planning a release within the next month+! There is a special twist on tap with Sun Studio 11 that we believe the general development community will appreciate- but I will not divulge just yet. (how is that for a teaser? :-) Have folks tried using Sun Studio's

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Rich Teer
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sean Sprague wrote: LKR has recently told us about the record performance of Studio 11. I would very much like to cut down my current 12-hour+ build time for OpenSolaris (OK, I should buy some 12+ hours?! WTF are you using man, an abacus?! -- Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA,

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Sean Sprague
Hey Kuldip! I thought you might be lurking nearby ;-) Hi Sean, Stay tuned...we're planning a release within the next month+! There is a special twist on tap with Sun Studio 11 that we believe the general development community will appreciate- but I will not divulge just yet. (how is

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Sean Sprague
Hey Casper, I'm not sure if this will really improve the performance of compiling all that much :-( Thanks anyways... Sean. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Joerg Schilling
Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 12+ hours?! WTF are you using man, an abacus?! I did get the same estimated time on a 900 MHz Pentium. I have not been able to finish on schilliX Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Bart Smaalders
Sean Sprague wrote: Hey Casper, I'm not sure if this will really improve the performance of compiling all that much :-( Thanks anyways... Sean. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org The most important

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Darren J Moffat
The most important thing to do is to set your .make.machines file to have an appropriate amount of parallelism. This depends on cpu count and ratio of disk speed to cpu. I run my 2 processor Opteron like this: The SUNWonbld package creates a /.make.machines based on calculating what could

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Sean Sprague
Bart/Darren, The most important thing to do is to set your .make.machines file to have an appropriate amount of parallelism. This depends on cpu count and ratio of disk speed to cpu. I run my 2 processor Opteron like this: The SUNWonbld package creates a /.make.machines based on

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Sean Sprague
Mr. T! On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sean Sprague wrote: LKR has recently told us about the record performance of Studio 11. I would very much like to cut down my current 12-hour+ build time for OpenSolaris (OK, I should buy some 12+ hours?! WTF are you using man, an abacus?! Something you know

Re: [osol-discuss] Studio 11

2005-10-27 Thread Mike Kupfer
Bart The most important thing to do is to set your .make.machines file Bart to have an appropriate amount of parallelism. .make.machines is just for ParallelMake, though, right? I believe that external folks are generally using dmake. mike ___