[opensource-dev] Daily Scrum Summary - Thursday, December 2

Thursday, December 2, 2010 General Notes -- - Merge Monkey of the Day: Oz Team Status -- Merov Linden -- *PAST* - STORM-151: kdu compression: More work on this. Explored some viewer j2c compression us

[opensource-dev] sidebar covering the bottom bar

Is there any hope of not having the sidebar cover the bottom bar? ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] nametag opacity

Are the nametags fixed at 100 per cent opaque or are they of variable opacity? By nametags I mean avatar names and group titles. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the pol

Re: [opensource-dev] POTENTIAL SHOW STOPPER

The latest Mesh Project Snapshot build for Mac (downloaded from LL as Second Life Developer, build 215879) was trash for me, though apparently different reason. Major regression, deferred rendering filled the screen with a mix of black and glowing chunks of graphics garbage. I'm thinking it ha

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

Hmm, it appears to have "background-image: url('http://codereview.secondlife.comrb/image=s/review_request_box_top_bg.png');" in the style attribute for one of the tables. (Don't know why tables were used instead of divs like the site is built...) Beyond the fact that it isn't necessary, the URL i

Re: [opensource-dev] Starting Investigation into Storm-236

I have a patch for that already if you like. The button's visibility will follow the voice preference (visible when voice is enabled, and invisible when voice is disabled), along with the bottom tray context menu option to hide it even when voice is enabled (so the same as your option 2). I

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

I'm getting "To protect your privacy, Thunderbird has blocked remote content." Why do the message include external images? As well because the "From" field is a person and not the list, I would have to whitelist every contributor to get rid of the message. On 12/02/2010 12:05 PM, Thickbrick

Re: [opensource-dev] Starting Investigation into Storm-236

Wolfpup, Just a heads up - this is not work we've committed to doing yet. I pulled it into STORM so we could review it internally and decide if it gets pulled onto our backlog - that's why you'll see it marked as being in the 'Product Backlog Proposals' version. There is a different internal team

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/2/#review13 --- indra/newview/llappviewer.cpp

[opensource-dev] Starting Investigation into Storm-236

I have created a repository for https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/STORM-236 to investigate the best way to go about providing this functionality to those that do not use voice or use it intermittently. My thoughts are to have one of the following: 1. Have the Speak button follow the Voice Pr

Re: [opensource-dev] Review board & lists

I'm adding my voice to that request as well. As someone that primarily tests builds, finds bugs, and suggests/pushes/begs new features, and who doesnt really understand code, these code reviews do nothing but clutter up an email address that I already don't have time to give the attention it s

Re: [opensource-dev] Review board & lists

Oz, there is a flaw in your logic about our ability to filter out review messages sent to this list. I receive this list in digest format. It's easier for me to scan through it that way, so I have no ability to filter out these review board messages. I'm with Boroondas--please set up another mai

[opensource-dev] How to filter ReviewBoard mail

On 2010-12-02 8:58, WolfPup Lowenhar wrote: I would be nice if the review board system had an address that was something that people that use email programs( I.E. Outlook, Thunderbird, Incredimail) could much easier filter. Like nore...@codereview.secondlife.com

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

I agree, I prefer them here. However, in such a case, they need to be a tad easier to filter, which is why I suggested an [RB] (or similar) subject tag. This would be consistent with the policies for this list, and would allow easy filtering. The string "Review Request:" is a tad ambiguous, as t

Re: [opensource-dev] Registering a SL Review Board

Or if it prefixed the message subjects with a [RB] tag, or similar. That would provide the same filterability, at least in gmail, while being easier to implement. Ricky Cron Stardust On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:58 AM, WolfPup Lowenhar wrote: > I would be nice if the review board system had an addre

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

On 2010-12-02 9:41, Boroondas Gupte wrote: PS: Is there any reason why the viewer-development-builds Archives are 'private' (i.e. only available to list members)? No... but I'll have to dig up the admin passwor

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

> Even easier (for subscribers) would be to have a separate mailing list for > the automatic Review Board emails. Then, everyone can decide themselves > whether to subscribe to that, too (or even only to that). Non-subscribers > would still have the option of seeing the threads on the list's archiv

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

On 12/02/2010 02:52 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > Note that these emails are easy to set up filters for - not only will > all of them have 'Review Request' in the Subject lines, there are also > a couple of custom headers in each message that make them easy to > recognize. On 12/02/2010 0

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

ponzu On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > As you'll have inferred, we now have a system set up for doing open code > reviews. It's not perfect, but it's pretty nice and very easy to use. > > It also generates quite a bit of email - one for each newly posted

Re: [opensource-dev] Registering a SL Review Board

I would be nice if the review board system had an address that was something that people that use email programs( I.E. Outlook, Thunderbird, Incredimail) could much easier filter. Like nore...@codereview.secondlife.com or something similar that way if they set up a filter it would not interfere wit

[opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

As you'll have inferred, we now have a system set up for doing open code reviews. It's not perfect, but it's pretty nice and very easy to use. It also generates quite a bit of email - one for each newly posted request, and one (properly threaded) for each comment or other action on that revie

Re: [opensource-dev] Registering a SL Review Board

On 2010-12-02 8:23, Jonathan Welch wrote: > Will the email address we input during the registration process be > visible at any point? Yes, since the email that reviewboard sends about whatever you did will be the From address. If you prefer, you can use the email address that you use for the o

Re: [opensource-dev] Registering a SL Review Board

Will the email address we input during the registration process be visible at any point? ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

> On 2010-12-02 04:52:10, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > > > Boroondas Gupte wrote: > EDITED TO ADD: (apparently Review Board can't handle comments on comments > on lines (sic!) and new comments on lines at the same time) > "The Review-Board diff view conveniently highlights them in red, so

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

> On 2010-12-02 04:52:10, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > EDITED TO ADD: (apparently Review Board can't handle comments on comments on lines (sic!) and new comments on lines at the same time) "The Review-Board diff view conveniently highlights them in red, so they are hard to miss ;-)" Of course, R

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/2/#review10 --- indra/newview/llappviewer.cpp

[opensource-dev] [META][WEB] Registering a SL Review Board account: Jira email address vs. mailing list address (was: Re: Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard te

https://codereview.secondlife.com/account/register/ advises: > Use the email address that you have associated with that Jira account. However, as mails automatically generated from my actions on Review Board get sent to the mailing list, I now changed the address in my SL Review Board profile to my

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

> > I just want to point out (as a reminder to other list members) > that the reviewboard is for code contributors only, that is > > "In order to post reviews or comment on them in this system, > you must have executed a Contribution Agreement". > > I would assume that we non-contributors still can

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Restructure loops that use breaks without need (reviewboard test)

On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 03:57:24 -, "Oz Linden" wrote: > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/2/ > --- > > Review req