On 2010-09-11 9:48, Ponzu wrote:
> I know it seems somewhat risky, but it is a WIKI. If you see ways to
> fix it, or even just mark that it iseems out of date, that is an
> improvement. Lots of small improvements will make a big difference.
> (/me promises to put editing where mouth is.)
>
> An
I know it seems somewhat risky, but it is a WIKI. If you see ways to
fix it, or even just mark that it iseems out of date, that is an
improvement. Lots of small improvements will make a big difference.
(/me promises to put editing where mouth is.)
Another thing is that usually people who work on
On 2010-09-10 22:53, Sheet Spotter wrote:
I would like to build the viewer-development source code under
Windoze. I was familiar with the Snowglobe process. Now I need to
understand any changes to the build process for Project Snowstorm.
The wiki instructions for the retrieving the source c
To answer your questions Sheet:
First off viewer-development ( aka Snowstom) dose still use the same set up
as you use for Snowglobe.
Second http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Viewer_2_Microsoft_Windows_Builds is
more current for building the viewer but it needs to be updated to include a
link to th
