[openssl.org #470] Build break on FreeBSD 4.2

2003-01-21 Thread via RT
The commit for PR: 462 broke build on FreeBSD 4.2, looks like a missing __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List

Re: openssl-SNAP-20030116 won't compile on Win32

2003-01-21 Thread Nils Larsch
Cory C. Albrecht wrote: Hello, I just got the latest snapshot (openssl-SNAP-20030116.tar.gz) to update my local OpenSSL, and it chokes part way through the Win32 build. Fixed, try the next snapshot. Regards, Nils __ OpenSSL

Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH

2003-01-21 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
1)Unless I understood you correctly, could you please send me the complete implementation for aix-shared which you want. You have to understand that I don't have access to AIX machine and therefore can't be completely sure what I actually want. What I asked in previous letter is to run the

Re: faster connexion

2003-01-21 Thread terr
Put two nics in. se one for transmissiona and the other for receiving. This will eliminate collisions. If that is not fast enouf then your next step is to look for a better interface. Options include 1000GB ethernet (fiber) and SCSI. Theoretically SCSI can run up to 160MB/sec (bursts) but

Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH

2003-01-21 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
As you don't appear to be interested in 64-bit build I've decided to settle for following. We leave the code as is [as in openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030119.tar.gz or later] and document the aix64-cc case in PROBLEMS in wait for more appropriate solution (covering even gcc:-). BTW. Can use verify

Re: faster connexion

2003-01-21 Thread Pablo J Royo
I donĀ“t know, but I think your socket buffer may be very low, (default about 8192 bytes or so) so your socket will never send to net as much bytes as he can. You can try to increase to 128Kb or 1Mb with setsockopt( ) function. (In fact it should be 2*(Bandwidth)*(ping time) to keep a full link)

RE: [openssl.org #463] PATCH

2003-01-21 Thread Shklover, Vladimir via RT
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed with -bautoexp. It was possible to modify Makefile pretty similar to aix43-cc. *** SHARED_LDFLAGS=-q64 ... # AIX:

[openssl.org #471] compiling openssl on windows

2003-01-21 Thread via RT
I'm trying to compile open ssl with mingw32 on win2kpro sp2. I downloaded ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/mingw32/gcc- 2.95.2/gcc-2.95.2-msvcrt.exe. I extracted all files to c:\gcc-2.95.2. I added c:\gcc-2.95.2 to my system path. I already had perl installed at c:\perl and I

RE: [openssl.org #463] PATCH

2003-01-21 Thread Shklover, Vladimir via RT
I just wanted to make sure that the last, successful modification for aix64-cc shared build (-bautoexp, not *.exp files) is now acceptable (as well as for aic43-cc) for you. About gcc, the problem remains but I was unable to find the solution. Anyway, I am skeptical about gcc on aix because

Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH

2003-01-21 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed with -bautoexp. It was possible to modify Makefile pretty similar to aix43-cc. ^^ But the challenge is to construct the rule which can be parametrized through configure line. But as already mentioned, I'd appreciate if you could verify if 'env

[openssl.org #471] compiling openssl on windows

2003-01-21 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[guest - Tue Jan 21 21:55:40 2003]: I'm trying to compile open ssl with mingw32 on win2kpro sp2. I downloaded ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu- win32/mingw32/gcc- 2.95.2/gcc-2.95.2-msvcrt.exe. I extracted all files to c:\gcc-2.95.2. I added c:\gcc-2.95.2 to my system path.