Enhancements to the assembler routines on UltraSparc.
Using the FPU gains about 30% in performance with a 1k RSA key.
The submission is being dismissed in favor of newly developed
bn_mul_mont codepath, which exhibits uniform 2x(!) performance
improvement for all key lenghts. One can argue
I am pretty sure they know what the hell is going on.
Anything special/subtle/uncommon we know is usually documented in
./PROBLEMS or ./FAQ depending on how often problem is encountered!
The Solaris 8 issue is NOT in the FAQ.
Because it's not classified as not encountered often enough.
I have build openssl 0.9.8a on 4 machines, all with
sh config no-idea no-threads -fPIC
make depend
make
and tried to run make test afterwards. On all 4 machines the sources
compiled fine. However, on 2 of them make test fails. The symptoms are
different. I'm currently unsure whether
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 19 11:02:11 2005]:
I have build openssl 0.9.8a on 4 machines, all with
sh config no-idea no-threads -fPIC
make depend
make
and tried to run make test afterwards. On all 4 machines the
sources
compiled fine. However, on 2 of them make test fails. The
On a SuSE 9.0 machine, however, with gcc 3.3.1 and glibc 2.3.2 make
test deadlocks after:
The following command should have some OK's and some failures
There are definitly a few expired certificates
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../apps/openssl verify -CApath ../certs
../certs/*.pem
The process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 19 11:47:39 2005]:
On a SuSE 9.0 machine, however, with gcc 3.3.1 and glibc 2.3.2 make
test deadlocks after:
The following command should have some OK's and some failures
There are definitly a few expired certificates
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ../apps/openssl
Thanks and sorry for not have read this text file...
Andy Polyakov via RT a écrit :
I'm using an Solaris 10 on AMD Opteron, and I'm trying to compile in
32bit mode (solaris-x86-gcc), but I've a Segmentation Fault.
Here's testlog file as attachment.
To help, the same compilation in 64bit mode
The header files in OpenSSL 0.9.7h have a lot of constness changes
compared to 0.9.7f, but this change is not mentioned in the changelog. Is
this intentional?
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
I found the following patch to be needed in order to build a shared
OpenSSL 0.9.7i with solaris-sparcv8-cc . Check-in [13045] did the same
for sparcv7 and sparcv9, but forgot sparcv8.
diff -aruN old/Configure new/Configure
--- old/Configure 2005-06-26 19:24:48.0 +0200
+++
Is there a reason why openssl-0.9.8 doesn't support building a 64-bit
version with gcc on AIX machines (nor does openssl-0.9.8a, AFAICS)?
You have to keep in mind that some targets are community supported, that
includes config lines, testing and eventual adaptations. None of OpenSSL
OpenSSL-0.9.8a fails to link for me on OS/2, a simple patch ensuring
the correct
compilation options
Applied. A.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
I found the following patch to be needed in order to build a shared
OpenSSL 0.9.7i with solaris-sparcv8-cc . Check-in [13045] did the same
for sparcv7 and sparcv9, but forgot sparcv8.
applied. thanks. a.
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi again,
Is there a reason why openssl-0.9.8 doesn't support building a 64-bit
version with gcc on AIX machines (nor does openssl-0.9.8a, AFAICS)?
You have to keep in mind that some targets are community supported, that
includes config lines, testing and eventual adaptations. None
13 matches
Mail list logo
