On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:30:32PM +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
Adding the extra parameter to SMIME_read_PKCS7() is problematical in
terms of compatibility with older versions of OpenSSL. Though a new
function with the extra flag wouldn't be a problem and them
SMIME_read_PKCS7() would
Download Version: openssl-0.9.8a.tar.gz.
My setup: Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition (available for free
download from Microsoft), Windows Server 2003 SP1 SDK. Windows Server
2003 SP1 SDK comes first in my PATH, then the VC2k5EE directories.
(Neither comes with ml.exe, so I cannot use the MASM
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
(I hope this is enough information to fix the issues. If it is not,
please contact me with additional information needed, and I will get
it to you.)
Try the latest 0.9.8 snapshot: a whole load of such warnings have been fixed
since the 0.9.8a
Hi,
it's me once again.
I spoke to the gentoo package administrator for openssl (see attached
emails)
He told me that this patch must be in the upstream openssl cvs.
Why is this patch not an official release or directly applied to the cvs?
bye
Manuel Schölling
---BeginMessage---
Clear-Text:
--- Configure 2005-08-02 06:59:42.0 -0400
+++ ../Configure2005-12-29 15:58:10.0 -0500
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@
IBM's AIX.
aix3-cc, cc:-O -DB_ENDIAN -qmaxmem=16384::(unknown):AIX::BN_LLONG
RC4_CHAR:::,
aix-gcc, gcc:-O -DB_ENDIAN::-D_THREAD_SAFE:AIX::BN_LLONG
Try the latest 0.9.8 snapshot: a whole load of such warnings have been fixed
since the 0.9.8a release.
For reference, http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11319580552r=1w=2
discusses this. Note that is also mentions alternative workaround for
possible loss of data when assigning value returned
you're right, I only built it statically ...
Shared does infact fail, trying to figure out what all needs
patching...
-Brad
Andy Polyakov wrote:
--- Configure2005-08-02 06:59:42.0 -0400
+++ ../Configure2005-12-29 15:58:10.0 -0500
@@ -404,6 +404,7 @@
IBM's AIX.
