[bhaskarv...@gmail.com - Tue Jan 03 12:47:57 2012]:
Sir,
am getting test failed when i tried to install openssl package in my
system for redhat RHEL5.4.
I choosed
#./configure zlib-dynamic shared
then build was successful.
#make
but error is in testing the build.
#make test
zlib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 Beta 1
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The first beta is now released.
The beta release is available for
Hello,
I have tested the OpenSSL 1.0.1 beta 1 release on OpenVMS Alpha and IA64 and
the build fails with the following error:
Compiling The mem_dbg.c File. (LIBRARY,LIB)
#include stdint.h
.^
%CC-F-NOINCLFILEF, Cannot find file stdint.h specified in #include directive.
at line number 72 in
I was testing OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable today and got this
.
making all in crypto/objects...
/usr/bin/perl objxref.pl obj_mac.num obj_xref.txt obj_xref.h
UX:sh (sh): ERROR: obj_xref.h: Cannot create
.
It looks like there is a autogenerated file in CVS.
Those of us that build from a
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Tim Rice wrote:
I was testing OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable today and got this
.
making all in crypto/objects...
/usr/bin/perl objxref.pl obj_mac.num obj_xref.txt obj_xref.h
UX:sh (sh): ERROR: obj_xref.h: Cannot create
.
It looks like there is a
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Tim Rice wrote:
I was testing OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable today and got this
.
making all in crypto/objects...
/usr/bin/perl objxref.pl obj_mac.num obj_xref.txt obj_xref.h
UX:sh (sh): ERROR: obj_xref.h:
The FIPS 140-2 validation effort for the OpenSSL FIPS Object Module 2.0
has reached an important milestone; we are now in the final phase of
this effort. The formal submission prepared by the test lab has been
sent to the CMVP. At this point we can only wait for their review and
action. Our
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received a malformed Server Hello handshake message.
(Error code: ssl_error_rx_malformed_server_hello)
No such problem in Outlook Express.
--
Member - Liberal International This is
I notice the shared library names (and SONAME) are 1.0.0 on the
OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries.
I'd just like verification that this is intentional and we can expect
binaries built against the 1.0.0 shared libs to run fine using the
1.0.1 shared libs.
Thanks.
--
Tim Rice
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:23:34AM -0800, Tim Rice wrote:
I notice the shared library names (and SONAME) are 1.0.0 on the
OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries.
1.0.0? That seems wrong. The shared library major number should
probably stay the same, but the minor number increase - unless the
intention is
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received a malformed Server Hello handshake message.
(Error code: ssl_error_rx_malformed_server_hello)
No such problem in Outlook Express.
I can
On 2012-01-03, at 11:59, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:23:34AM -0800, Tim Rice wrote:
I notice the shared library names (and SONAME) are 1.0.0 on the
OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries.
1.0.0? That seems wrong. The shared library major number should
probably stay the same,
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Allan Clark wrote:
Logically, depending on where the API is stable/constant, the SONAME maybe
should be 1.0, with soft links from the libXX.so.1.0 - libXX.so.1.0.1 .. I'm
referring to the old design where the filename/SONAME/softlink was
used/intended to allow some
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received a malformed Server Hello handshake message.
(Error code:
s_client and s_server fail to establish connection with TLS 1.2. Valid
self-signed CA certificate, and valid client and server certificates are used
(attached).
With unpatched openssl-1.0.1-beta1 the following is observed (failure case):
Server:
openssl s_server -Verify 3 -cert server.pem
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Jean Cyr wrote:
s_client and s_server fail to establish connection with TLS 1.2. Valid
self-signed CA certificate, and valid client and server certificates are used
(attached).
With unpatched openssl-1.0.1-beta1 the following is observed (failure case):
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:36:24PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received a malformed Server Hello handshake message.
(Error code:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:08:54PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:36:24PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received
Some things came up attempting to build on OpenServer 5
.
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../modes -I../asn1 -I../evp -I../../include -fPIC
-DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT
Yes, 516 instead of 514 does the trick.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:51 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: BUG: openssl-1.0.1-beta1 bug - TLS 1.2
On 04.01.2012 03:16, Tim Rice wrote:
Some things came up attempting to build on OpenServer 5
.
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../modes -I../asn1 -I../evp -I../../include -fPIC
-DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS
yes i have installed zlib in my system.
On 1/3/12, Stephen Henson via RT r...@openssl.org wrote:
[bhaskarv...@gmail.com - Tue Jan 03 12:47:57 2012]:
Sir,
am getting test failed when i tried to install openssl package in my
system for redhat RHEL5.4.
I choosed
#./configure zlib-dynamic
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:16:36PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Mozilla Thunderbird is choking saying
SSL received a
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:42PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:16:36PM +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012, The Doctor wrote:
Finally got Openssl 1.0.1 daily working
However,
Here are a few test results.
Built from 03 Jan 2012 OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable CVS
- OpenServer 5
Would not build. See other posts for details
- UnixWare 7.1.4 w/ MP4
ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL.
OPENSSL_CONF=apps/openssl.cnf util/opensslwrap.sh version -a
OpenSSL
25 matches
Mail list logo