[openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2014-08-13 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Very old release. Netware is no longer supported. After trying to carefully read the text of the RT, I don't *think* there's an OpenSSL bug; please file a new RT if I'm wrong about that. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2004-06-29 Thread Verdon Walker
I did not realize that ERR_remove_state() worked that way. In looking at the code, it appears that it does indeed delete the table making ERR_free_state_table() unnecessary in properly coded applications. Thanks. Verdon "Richard Levitte via RT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2004 5:47:58 AM Just a

[openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2004-06-28 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Hi. I just added the latest diff to the contribution files (it should appear on the contributions page within an hour). I've looked back at the ERR_free_state_table() discussion, and I can't find any message where we came to a resolution. Looking at the patch right now, I still fail to see

[openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2004-06-28 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Just a comment on what I just wrote... [levitte - Mon Jun 28 13:37:50 2004]: I've looked back at the ERR_free_state_table() discussion, and I can't find any message where we came to a resolution. Looking at the patch right now, I still fail to see what that function does that

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2004-06-25 Thread Verdon Walker via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-12-15 Thread Verdon Walker via RT
Richard, Any chance yet to reconsider applying this patch to 0.9.7? Verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/2/2003 3:38:32 PM Addressing the points in order: ERR_free_state_table() is not meant to do the same as ERR_remove_state(). It is indeed meant to clean up the entire table and is used for

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-12-02 Thread Verdon Walker via RT
Addressing the points in order: ERR_free_state_table() is not meant to do the same as ERR_remove_state(). It is indeed meant to clean up the entire table and is used for process cleanup, not thread cleanup. NetWare will clean up process resources, but does complain when you don't clean up after

[openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-11-28 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 27 09:23:09 2003]: This patch adds support for the NetWare OS to OpenSSL 0.9.7. After applying this patch, the instructions for building for NetWare can be found in the INSTALL.NW file in the root directory. This patch attempts to minimize impact on other

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-06-19 Thread Verdon Walker
I meant to send this to the group last week and accidentally sent it only to Richard. It looks like all these problems still exist in the latest development snapshot so I figured I resend to the group in case it got lost. The first error I see with the latest developement snapshot when

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-06-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:35:20 -0600, Verdon Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: VWalker The first error I see with the latest developement snapshot when compiling for Windows is: VWalker VWalker cl /Fotmp32.dbg\ech_ossl.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32.dbg /MDd /W3 /WX /Zi

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

2003-06-11 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:43:03 -0600, Verdon Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: VWalker I have also applied the patch to the latest 0.9.8 development VWalker snapshot. It applies (with the exception of changes to VWalker hw_aep.c which does not exist in the 0.9.8 tree),