This seems to have been fixed.
Closing.
Matt
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4326
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
In message <20160222180008.ga31...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016
19:00:08 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said:
vinschen> OTOH, is it much of a problem to apply the patches used for the Cygwin
vinschen> distro into the 1.0.2 branch so we can get rid of them entirely?
On Feb 22 18:43, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <20160222173404.gb11...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016
> 18:34:04 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said:
>
> vinschen> On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> vinschen> > I believe that the auto-detecting
In message <20160222173404.gb11...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016
18:34:04 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said:
vinschen> On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
vinschen> > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking
detection of
vinschen> >
On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of
> architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from
> `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an
> indicator?
Uh oh,
#4326] Failed to configure for
Cygwin-x64
It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this
morning.
Test Summary Report
---
../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0
Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 111
Parse errors: Bad
#4326] Failed to configure for
Cygwin-x64
It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this
morning.
Test Summary Report
---
../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0
Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 111
Parse errors: Bad
:~/openssl$
Ju
-Original Message-
From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Levitte via RT
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:49 AM
To: noloa...@gmail.com
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin
:~/openssl$
Ju
-Original Message-
From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Levitte via RT
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:49 AM
To: noloa...@gmail.com
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin
Sorry, wrong commit cited here, the correct one is
5c57fbb8ca991e8db7ce23174613898a27ca3fcb
Vid Mon, 22 Feb 2016 kl. 14.46.52, skrev levitte:
> Issue fixed in commit e80381e1a3309f5d4a783bcaa508a90187a48882
>
> --
> Richard Levitte
> levi...@openssl.org
--
Richard Levitte
levi...@openssl.org
Issue fixed in commit e80381e1a3309f5d4a783bcaa508a90187a48882
--
Richard Levitte
levi...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4326
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
Actually, master already had a patch, which is even better. I'll apply one
reminding of that.
Vid Sun, 21 Feb 2016 kl. 08.22.02, skrev noloa...@gmail.com:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Levitte via RT
> wrote:
> > Would you try the attached patch, please?
> >
>
>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Levitte via RT
wrote:
> Would you try the attached patch, please?
>
Looks good for both 1.0.2 and Master.
Its also nice to see CHACHA_ENC and POLY1305_OBJ in the list below.
=
openssl-git $ ./config
Operating system:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Levitte via RT
wrote:
> Would you try the attached patch, please?
>
Looks good for both 1.0.2 and Master.
Its also nice to see CHACHA_ENC and POLY1305_OBJ in the list below.
=
openssl-git $ ./config
Operating system:
Would you try the attached patch, please?
--
Richard Levitte
levi...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4326
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
diff --git a/config b/config
index 77f730f..5213a0d 100755
--- a/config
+++ b/config
@@
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of
> architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from
> `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an
> indicator?
Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of
> architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from
> `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an
> indicator?
Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Richard Levitte via RT
wrote:
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of
> architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from
> `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that
I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of
architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from
`uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an
indicator?
Cheers,
Richard
Vid Sun, 21 Feb 2016 kl. 04.33.17, skrev
After configuring on Windows 8.1/Core i5 4th gen machine, make'ing
depend produces the following errors:
$ make depend
making depend in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/Test_User/openssl-1.0.2f/crypto'
cc1: error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set
cc1: error:
20 matches
Mail list logo