> I'm creating X509 certificate requests and certificates in code,
> trying to add X509v3 Subject Alternative Name, with 1.1.0f.
>
> But if I add a list of four domains, ie:
> The certificate seems to ignore some and repeat others:
To answer my own question, I was using A
Open device for new account thank you.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Dear everyone,
I am using PyOpenSSL which is the thin wrapper of OpenSSL to add the
extension 'subject directory attributes' to a certificate by a Python
program. The extension names 'subjectDirAttrs' and
'subjectDirectoryAttributes' have been tried but the error occurs
commit fb0303f in master.
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3136
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Hi
I am trying to test behaviour of Openssl in resumption rejection case.
I am using with Openssl-1.1.0 pre2 version. When using Openssl as
client and other ssl library as server, Initially client and server
accepts on resumption, later server expects client rejected the
resumption and sends
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Fixed now, thanks for the report.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
On Wed Aug 05 01:06:40 2015, m...@bogosian.net wrote:
Hi Steve,
I've attached three certificate collections: two that fail (where
subject == issuer) and one that works around the problem (where
subject != issuer).
OK thanks for the examples. The bug is that OpenSSL 1.0.2 is less strict about
On Tue Aug 04 18:25:25 2015, m...@bogosian.net wrote:
Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'd be happy to
elaborate.
Can you attach examples of the two certificates (EE and CA) that exhibit this
problem?
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial
Later versions[1] of OpenSSL will (mistakenly) complain that if subject text ==
issuer text, then the certificate is self-signed (even if it isn't).
[1] I haven't narrowed down exactly which; 0.9.8 and 1.0.0 generally don't
exhibit this problem, whereas 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 generally do.
A more
Hi Steve,
I've attached three certificate collections: two that fail (where subject ==
issuer) and one that works around the problem (where subject != issuer). In my
personal testing (on OS X), OpenSSL 0.9.8zd (installed by the OS) works on all
three collections, whereas OpenSSL 1.0.2d
Hi guys,
Im having trouble on creating a Self-Signed Certificate on a Windows CE 6.0 device.
I posted a question on stackoverflow but until now only one person posted a comment.
Can you give more details?
The post is:
On 5/31/2015 2:46 AM, noloa...@gmail.com via RT wrote:
apps.c has a couple of parsing routines called load_pubkey and
load_key. rsautl uses those routines.
However, there's no option in rsautil to use anything other than a
ASN.1/DER or PEM encoded traditional key (or subject public key info
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Richard Levitte via RT r...@openssl.org
wrote:
Nice idea, I'm however thinking that much of the trying different formats
could
be moved to load_key / load_pubkey, all that would be needed is a keyformat
denoting try anything. -1, perhaps?
I like the idea,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Richard Levitte via RT r...@openssl.org
wrote:
Nice idea, I'm however thinking that much of the trying different formats
could
be moved to load_key / load_pubkey, all that would be needed is a keyformat
denoting try anything. -1, perhaps?
I like the idea,
, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
apps.c has a couple of parsing routines called load_pubkey and
load_key. rsautl uses those routines.
However, there's no option in rsautil to use anything other than a
ASN.1/DER or PEM encoded traditional key (or subject public key info).
The code paths
load_pubkey and
load_key. rsautl uses those routines.
However, there's no option in rsautil to use anything other than a
ASN.1/DER or PEM encoded traditional key (or subject public key info).
The code paths are present, we just can't seem to get to them.
Folks in the field have problem
apps.c has a couple of parsing routines called load_pubkey and
load_key. rsautl uses those routines.
However, there's no option in rsautil to use anything other than a
ASN.1/DER or PEM encoded traditional key (or subject public key info).
The code paths are present, we just can't seem to get
Hi,
OpenSSL segfaults when trying to create an encrypted CMS data envelope
using subject key identifier and EC. Have tested this in version
1.0.2a and latest 1.1.0 release as of today (2015-04-09) with the same
result.
Example:
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.2a 19 Mar 2015
$ openssl ecparam
Test, please ignore
___
openssl-dev mailing list
openssl-dev@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
that I pasted whole commit message into a subject.
Anyway, CCing Rich Salz here.
Rich,
You seem to be on a wave on triaging tickets, may be you could take a
look at this one eventually?
Thank you,
Fedor.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com
wrote
it -
please let me know and I will revert everything except style changes in
that 0002 patch.
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com wrote:
Oops, just realized that I pasted whole commit message into a subject.
Anyway, CCing Rich Salz here.
Rich
.
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com wrote:
Oops, just realized that I pasted whole commit message into a subject.
Anyway, CCing Rich Salz here.
Rich,
You seem to be on a wave on triaging tickets, may be you could take a
look at this one
Oops, just realized that I pasted whole commit message into a subject.
Anyway, CCing Rich Salz here.
Rich,
You seem to be on a wave on triaging tickets, may be you could take a look
at this one eventually?
Thank you,
Fedor.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Fedor Indutny fe...@indutny.com
This patch is introducing `async_key_ex_cb` member of both `SSL_CTX` and
`SSL`, and `SSL_supply()`. If `async_key_ex_cb` is present:
* Server will ignore dummy RSA key, assuming that it is matching the
certificate.
* Server will invoke this callback with either:
* `SSL_KEY_EX_RSA`
*
Hi,
I have a query for Ca-Cert list.
If at gateway we have configured two CA-certs A1 and A2 both having same
subject and content except time-stamp of generation.
If peer sends Cert matching to A2, gateway tries to validate it with
A1(subject being same and configured first in list
Hi,
I have a query for Ca-Cert list.
If at gateway we have configured two CA-certs A1 and A2 both having same
subject and content except time-stamp of generation.
If peer sends Cert matching to A2, gateway tries to validate it with
A1(subject being same and configured first in list
Hi Steve and Krzysztof,
I have not been able to reproduce the same output as openssl. Can you be
more specific how you achieved it?
So x509_name_canon generates the CANONICAL representation of the subject
name, right?
If I understand correctly, after generating the canon encoding I would only
Openssl behaves differently when printing subject or issuer from request
or from existing certificate in x509. If using x509 there is an extra
space after '=' character.
It can affect scripts that checks whether these fields in request and
certificate match. Moreover when printing serial
???:-D
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
--
?? Nokia ??
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013, Krzysztof Benedyczak wrote:
Hi Openssl Developers,
Since openssl 1.0.0 a new subject hash is used, i.e. the output of the
openssl x509 -subject_hash ...
has changed. The old one was quite easy to decipher and commonly
known (part of the MD5 hash of the bin form
Hi,
W dniu 24.04.2013 17:36, Dr. Stephen Henson pisze:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013, Krzysztof Benedyczak wrote:
Hi Openssl Developers,
Since openssl 1.0.0 a new subject hash is used, i.e. the output of the
openssl x509 -subject_hash ...
has changed. The old one was quite easy to decipher
Hi Openssl Developers,
Since openssl 1.0.0 a new subject hash is used, i.e. the output of the
openssl x509 -subject_hash ...
has changed. The old one was quite easy to decipher and commonly known
(part of the MD5 hash of the bin form of the subject name). Now AFAIU
MD5 has been changed do
:o*@nn-idol*::D
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
:o*@nn-idol*::D
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
: couldn't get X509-subject!
curl_easy_perform() failed: SSL connect error error no is 35 .
I viewed the root certiciate using tool , I could see the subject
field in the ceritificate .
It is very unlikely curl is looking at the subject in the root
(CA) cert; that is not relevant to anything
and sometimes others,
but its standard truststore methods support only PEM.)
And try to excute the curl client with error buffer set
(it will save the errors which will thrown by ssl) ,
I get the below error while doing
223: SSL: couldn't get X509-subject!
curl_easy_perform() failed: SSL
When the -noemailDN flag is used with the openssl ca command, the email address
is only removed from the Subject DN, but not the Issuer DN. This leaves
self-signed CA certs created with this flag unverifiable, because the DNs do
not match.
--
Stefan H. Holek
ste...@epy.co.at
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
On the FIPS 140 web page under Current Status it indicates that The
current best estimate for final formal award of a FIPS 140-2 validation
certificate is February 2012. Can someone confirm for me that windows
7 will be included?
The current openssl-1.0.1-stable-SNAP-2021 and the last 6 or so previous
versions fails with the following on Microsoft Windows:
ssltest.c
link /nologo /subsystem:console /opt:ref /debug /out:out32\ssltest.exe @
C:\DOCUME~1\zkrr01\LOCALS~1\Temp\nne04256.
ssleay32.lib(t1_enc.obj) :
On 09/11/2011 12:12 AM, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Hodie IV Id. Sep. MMXI, Maarten Billemont via RT scripsit:
According to rfc1779, the key STREET in the subject name should be capitalized.
obj_dat.h specifies it as a lower-cased street.
This is incorrect and breaks when OpenSSL is used to parse
Hodie III Id. Sep. MMXI, Peter Sylvester scripsit:
On 09/11/2011 12:12 AM, Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Hodie IV Id. Sep. MMXI, Maarten Billemont via RT scripsit:
According to rfc1779, the key STREET in the subject name should be
capitalized.
obj_dat.h specifies it as a lower-cased
Hodie IV Id. Sep. MMXI, Maarten Billemont via RT scripsit:
According to rfc1779, the key STREET in the subject name should be
capitalized.
obj_dat.h specifies it as a lower-cased street.
This is incorrect and breaks when OpenSSL is used to parse in
rfc1779-compliant distinguished names
Hi everybody
I am trying to do some time measurement in openssl when the apache is running,
I would like to plug in the small code in openssl and do some print out(when
apache runs)and mesure the tick.
Can anybody help me to do the printf in openssl?
Thanks
Hi,
I am experiencing some weird problem. After running for few seconds, server
sends some malformed SSL packets to Client. This problem is mainly seen on
lower bandwidth. If i increase the bandwidth then this problem is not seen.
Can anybody suggests me how to resolve this problem. Any
This is an enhancement request that addresses an incompatibility
introduced with the new SHA1-based hashing of the subject/issuer name
defined in openssl 1.0.0. The necessary patches based on openssl
1.0.0-beta4 are attached.
Reason for the request:
The change forces sites, that distribute
Hi
what means:
Error Loading extension section v3_ca
I received this error when I type:
openssl x509 -req -in rootreq.pem -sha1 -extfile myconf.cnf -extensions
v3_ca -signkey rootkey.pem -out rootcert.pem
--
Looking for input on the two questions at the end of this
message.
ECC Design Team Survey
Background
The PKIX WG has been presented with two different proposals
for the specification of ECC public keys in the subject public
key info field of X.509 certificates.
Proposal #1: A current PKIX ID
Hi,
I've just tried compiling OpenSSL-0.9.8a for HPPA64 architecture
(using gcc-4.1) and 'make test' ends with
...
ecb idea ok
cbc idea ok
cfb64 idea ok
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest
*** Termination signal 139
Stop.
*** Error exit code 1
Stop.
Any known
Hi Richard,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it
registers a lock debugging callback) and Apache 2.x (and other apps
too no doubt)
That's because those applications don't set up
Dear Developers,
I am interested in plugging in my own implementations of the crypto algorithm AES(rijndael) into the open ssl source code.Later on I would also like to do the same for the RSA algo and the symmetric key generator(AES based PRBG as per FIPS stds).
Please guide me how to go about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri May 6 19:20:48 2005]:
Hello,
I have noticed a problem while using TC Trustcenter certificates with
OpenSSL.
The encoding of the 'Subject' in the issuer cert contrains 'T61String'
elements while the user cert issued by that sub-CA contains only
'Printablestring
Hello,
I have noticed a problem while using TC Trustcenter certificates with
OpenSSL.
The encoding of the 'Subject' in the issuer cert contrains 'T61String'
elements while the user cert issued by that sub-CA contains only
'Printablestring' in the 'Issuer' field.
Based on that difference in types
Here is what i am
trying to do...
Config file has
these lines:
[ CA_default
]
..
x509_extensions = usr_cert
[ usr_cert
]
basicConstraints=CA:FALSE
keyUsage =
digitalSignature, keyEnciphermentsubjectKeyIdentifier=hashauthorityKeyIdentifier=keyid,issuer:always
#
Certificate
Hello,
You e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has NOT been validated, possibly because the
code you entered was incorrect.
Your message (Subject: [openssl.org #820] openssl 0.9.7c bug ) has therefore not been
delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please, re-enter it. If in the meanwhile you have
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Michael Bell wrote:
some people ask me how to create the following subject for certificates:
cn=abc + serialNumber=123,o=company,c=de
It is no problem to insert this subject to the -subj option of openssl
ca but the sourcecode looks like OpenSSL
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Michael Bell wrote:
-subj in ca.c is important for me. So I start reading the code. I dug in
req.c and it looks for me like mval signals as the last argument to
X509_NAME_add_entry_by_NID that this is not a new RDN only an addition
to the last RDN. Does this be
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
There's possibly a problem in that it would change the meaning of the '+'
character which might break existing use of -subj or even permit some
malicious use. So I'd suggest that any new behaviour should only be enabled
with a command line swicth.
Ok, taken. I created a
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003, Michael Bell wrote:
another problem is the output like you mentioned. -nameopt oneline works
but -nameopt rfc2253 fails. rfc2253 escapes a blank but perhaps I send
the blank to OpenSSL by myself - so no real problem. This is not wrong
but it is senseless.
Hi,
some people ask me how to create the following subject for certificates:
cn=abc + serialNumber=123,o=company,c=de
It is no problem to insert this subject to the -subj option of openssl
ca but the sourcecode looks like OpenSSL ca uses abc +
serialNumber=123 as value. Is this correct
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Michael Bell wrote:
Hi,
some people ask me how to create the following subject for certificates:
cn=abc + serialNumber=123,o=company,c=de
It is no problem to insert this subject to the -subj option of openssl
ca but the sourcecode looks like OpenSSL ca uses abc
Dear friends,
I want to use Openssl on MVS operating system on S/390.
I would appreciate if any one provide links/pointers to this port.
thanks in Advance,
Antonio Dima
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi all,
I just try to recompile my openssl applications with
the 0.9.7c and the PKCS12_decrypt_d2i function no longer
exist.
I can use my own decrypt/d2i function but I would prefer
to use what OpenSSL provides as a replacement, if any.
Any idea?
Pierre De Boeck
Sr System Engineer
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003, Christian Barmala wrote:
Hi Stephen,
thank you for your fast reply.
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 3:30 PM
When I use Email I get the Error Message: Subject Attribute Email
Hi Stephen,
thank you for your fast reply.
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 3:30 PM
When I use Email I get the Error Message: Subject Attribute Email has
no
known NID, skipped
I think that is a bug...
Good to know
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003, Christian Barmala wrote:
Hi Stephen,
thank you for your fast reply.
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 3:30 PM
When I use Email I get the Error Message: Subject Attribute Email has
no
known
define
#define SN_pkcs9_emailAddress Email
#define LN_pkcs9_emailAddress emailAddress
When I use Email I get the Error Message: Subject Attribute Email has no
known NID, skipped
I think that is a bug...
When I use emailAddress the certificate request is for the subject
#define LN_pkcs9_emailAddress emailAddress
When I use Email I get the Error Message: Subject Attribute Email has no
known NID, skipped
When I use emailAddress the certificate request is for the subject
C=DE, ST=Nordrheinwestfalen, L=Oberhausen, O=ABCGmbH, OU=Internet,
CN=User/[EMAIL PROTECTED
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:50:01 +0700, Blue-Boonchai
Aussawasongsilp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
boonchai.a i serach some information and summarize by myself is
boonchai.a renewal = same key,same subject and new serial .
boonchai.a
boonchai.a but i test renewal cerificate
dear all,
i serach some information and summarize
by myself is
renewal = same key,same subject and new
serial .
but i test renewal cerificate with signed
document by old cert.
it's not work i mean can't replace
renewal cert to old cert completely.
ex, iencrypt with old cert but
can't
hi
i am trying to sign a document in the smime format,i did this either by
using the command smime or using the PKCS7_sign and SMIME_write_PKCS7
but when i tried to verify the signed file with smime -verify i obtain a
message :
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
and when i tried with the function
OUTPUT OF ./config -t
Operating system: 9000/785-hp-hpux11
Configuring for hpux11
/usr/contrib/bin/perl ./Configure hpux11
Following the error reported by the command make
after running ./Configure hpux11-64bit-cc on a system HP-UX hpiv113 B.11.11 U 9000/785
2016775763 unlimited-user license
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Romana Rubino via RT wrote:
OUTPUT OF ./config -t
Operating system: 9000/785-hp-hpux11
Configuring for hpux11
/usr/contrib/bin/perl ./Configure hpux11
Following the error reported by the command make
after running ./Configure hpux11-64bit-cc
Sorry
(See attached file: err)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
I already have a gcc installed (that one GNU). Can you know it is ok?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List
How can I force the use of gcc?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Sep 5 09:23:59 2002]:
This patch is a replacement for RT/openssl.org: Ticket #237. Please
retract Ticket #237.
The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory
Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are
currently
Hello!
I am using smime-tool for creating SMIME messages. I found and
option which I can use to extract signer's certificate when verifying the
message.
How I can extract encryption Certificates used to encrypt the
message?
I found how to extract issuer_and_serial from PKCS7
I have got a subject string of the certification. And I want to use this
string to find out
the proper X509 object in a stack. I know the method
X509 *X509_find_by_subject(STACK_OF(X509) *sk,X509_NAME *name);
,but I don't know how to construct a X509_NAME object by giving
This patch is a replacement for RT/openssl.org: Ticket #237. Please
retract Ticket #237.
The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory
Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are
currently unsupported by OpenSSL. openssl.cnf entries for Subject
The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory
Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are
currently unsupported by OpenSSL. In this patch, Subject Directory
Attributes are parsed like Authority Information Access.
An OID for Corestreet Credential
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 21 22:21:34 2002]:
The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory
Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are
currently unsupported by OpenSSL. In this patch, Subject Directory
Attributes are parsed like Authority
hi forks,
I am installing Openss0.9.6e on win2000,
When I do nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak
it shows it can't find stdlib.h and string.h in cryptlib.c
and other problems.
Please tell me: how can I solve this problem.
just what kind of configure should I do?
my platform is win2000 sp 2 and visual
Dear all,
I get error messages when I tryed to compile the latest version of
openssl.
I attach a logfile of make
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6d
Last change: Fix crypto/asn1/a_sign.c so that 'parameters' is
omitte...
Options: -mips4
OS (uname): IRIX gold
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jul 11 15:25:40 2002]:
I get error messages when I tryed to compile the latest version of
openssl.
I attach a logfile of make...
The error messages indicate, that there is something odd with your gcc
setup. It seems, that the assembler used cannot correctly handle
Title: Subject Alternative Name : openssl and RFC 2459
Hi
I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This Subject Alternative Name is defined in this way :
id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
GeneralNames ::= SEQUENCE SIZE
On Wed, May 15, 2002, CAMUS Sylvie FTRD/DTL/ISS wrote:
Hi
I Have read RFC 2459 about Subject Alternative Name. This Subject
Alternative Name is defined in this way :
id-ce-subjectAltName OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-ce 17 }
SubjectAltName ::= GeneralNames
GeneralNames
Keep getting a fatal error when trying to run the make command for openssl
Here is the error:
testing...
cc -DMONOLITH -I../include -KPIC -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -xtarget=u
ltra -xarch=v8plus -xO5 -xstrconst -xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W
-DULTRASPARC -DMD5_ASM
-c
Hello
I found your contact information while looking for information about B2B exchanges. I
believe that I have came up with a fresh concept for creating communities for B2B
exchanges with unlimited streaming video, audio and PowerPoint presentations.
I am genuinely interested in your
Please Remove my name from the
list.
There is an input sanity check in asn1_lib.c that is #if'd out for
some reason. In its absence, a corrupt certificate read by d2i_X509()
can at least crash the process. Additionally, the sanity checks both
there and in a_bytes.c do not take into account a possibility of
negative length and of
Title: new oid in subject alt name
Hi
I want to add a new oid in the subject altname and I can't do it.
I have look at sources (v3.alt.c) and i have seen the function which returns an error :
--
GENERAL_NAME *v2i_GENERAL_NAME(X509V3_EXT_METHOD *method, X509V3_CTX *ctx
Bonjour,
I am trying to install Openssl on my computer:
a fatal error return happens :
making all in crypto/sha...
cc -I.. -I../../include -DTHREADS -pthread -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -std1 -tune host
-fast -readonly_strings -c sha_dgst.c
Fatal: Insufficient virtual memory to continue
OpenSSL Bug report Tue Mar 19 11:07:02 PST 2002
From: Linda Gay Thompson NASA Ames Research Center, Mt. View, Ca. 94035
I had the same problem when compiling with the -O3 flag.
Please send email response to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6c
Last change:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Jonsson Per-Arne S. wrote:
Hello!
I have problem with the syntax and where to add lsocket into the Makefile.
What config target are you using?
What does the EX_LIBS= line in Makefile say?
--
Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
