Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20160222180008.ga31...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:00:08 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said: vinschen> OTOH, is it much of a problem to apply the patches used for the Cygwin vinschen> distro into the 1.0.2 branch so we can get rid of them entirely?

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 22 18:43, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <20160222173404.gb11...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 > 18:34:04 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said: > > vinschen> On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > vinschen> > I believe that the auto-detecting

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20160222173404.gb11...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:34:04 +0100, Corinna Vinschen said: vinschen> On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: vinschen> > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of vinschen> >

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 21 06:27, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator? Uh oh,

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Lee, Ju via RT
#4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64 It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this morning. Test Summary Report --- ../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 111 Parse errors: Bad

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Lee, Ju (Converged Systems)
#4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64 It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this morning. Test Summary Report --- ../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 111 Parse errors: Bad

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Lee, Ju via RT
It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this morning. Test Summary Report --- ../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 111 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 1 tests but ran 0.

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-22 Thread Lee, Ju (Converged Systems)
It failed to 'make test' at d784bcffa3dcd7ac4a0c77bfac4e686dcb771bd9 this morning. Test Summary Report --- ../../openssl/test/recipes/70-test_sslcertstatus.t (Wstat: 28416 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 111 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 1 tests but ran 0.

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-21 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Would you try the attached patch, please? > Looks good for both 1.0.2 and Master. Its also nice to see CHACHA_ENC and POLY1305_OBJ in the list below. = openssl-git $ ./config Operating system:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > Would you try the attached patch, please? > Looks good for both 1.0.2 and Master. Its also nice to see CHACHA_ENC and POLY1305_OBJ in the list below. = openssl-git $ ./config Operating system:

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator? Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that should be used as an > indicator? Yes, that seems to be the issue at hand for OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4326] Failed to configure for Cygwin-x64

2016-02-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: > I believe that the auto-detecting script, ./config, is lacking detection of > architecture for Cygwin. Does one preferably recognise a x86_64 Cygwin from > `uname -m` or is there something in `uname -s` that