Applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
This is a test of the upgraded RT for openssl.org
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
From: Michael Wodei wo...@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:33:24 -0700
You can withdraw this one, I found the issue
Mike Wodei
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing
Closing as resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Thanks, patch applied.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 21 14:23:50 2008]:
Hello rt,
During stress testing my project, suddenly got crash inside openssl
openssl version - openssl-0.9.8i
compiler - Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition (C++
project)
project - x64 debug compilation
OS -
From answer only sent to mailing list:
Yeah, it looks right. I haven't yet got it working with my test case,
because I need to use DTLS1_BAD_VER and there are other parts missing
from HEAD for that, on top of my patch in #1751 -- but I agree with your
assessment that it shouldn't be needed any
[jaenicke - Fri Oct 10 12:42:51 2008]:
I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
break it.
Note: I have reverted the DTLS1_BAD_VER part as DTLS1_BAD_VER handling
is not
present in HEAD
I have applied the patch to 0.9.8-stable and adopted it to 0.9.9-dev. I
am not very familiar with the DTLS implementation so hopefully I did not
break it.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 07 10:57:04 2008]:
This patch to the 0.9.8 branch fixes two bugs with misordered incoming
packets in DTLS, which are reported as RT #1752.
Could you comment on the 0.9.9-dev branch as well?
The patch to d1_pkt.c applies fine. The length object is gone from the
Thanks, I have applied the respective patch to the 0.9.7, 0.9.8 and 0.9.9
branches, see
http://cvs.openssl.org/rlog?f=openssl/crypto/sha/Makefile
for commits 17496 to 17498.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
It seems you do not have enough licenses for your C compiler which is
thus locking up.
Sincere regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The OpenSSL project does not have a root CA program and has decided to
not supply root CA certificates with the toolkit.
Please checkout the FAQ:
How can I set up a bundle of commercial root CA certificates?
http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#USER16
Best regards,
Lutz
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The OpenSSL distribution as of 0.9.8h is no longer shipped with any root
CA certificates.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Respective patch applied, thanks.
The fix will be in 0.9.8h.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Issue resolved by code modification, see ticket #1513.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
The missing defitions have been added.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
I have applied both the patch from Roumen Petrov and the Fixup from Alon
Bar-Lev.
I don't have a mingw environment to actually verify the correct
operation. Please check out the next snapshot and verify that everything
is working now as expected.
Best regards,
Lutz
Closing as well according to #1552
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
I have applied a different modification which is a little bit more in
line with the handling in other applications (where the handling seems
to be correct).
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17067
Best regards,
Lutz
__
Thanks, fixed in
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17069 (0.9.8-stable)
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=17068 (HEAD)
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
I agree with Shaw Graham George's post on openssl-dev. Modifying system
settings upon installation would seem to be too intrusive for the
OpenSSL source package.
OpenSSL as distributed by the OpenSSL team does not modify system
settings during installation on any platform. Typically integrators
Andrew Lamoureux via RT wrote:
Hi, I'd like to report a bug in openssl-0.9.8g compiled with
Visual Studio. OS is Windows XP.
Access violation occurs when BN_rshift() is used on a BIGNUM whose
bit length is less (amount required varies) than the number of
bits requesting to be shifted.
OpenSSL does create keys in more components than just gen(r|d)sa. In
none of these functions any file permission mask is used.
All of the components in openssl/apps are using the file-BIO which
behaves like stdio and does not have idea about file permissions.
People using OpenSSL to generate their
That is indeed true. I have migrated RT quite a lot of time ago but did
miss the obvious references in the process.
* fixed the URI in the respective files for future releases
* added a redirection at the URI provided to the new page
Best regards,
Lutz
Closing according to respective email on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
a couple of days ago I've reported the bug:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1641
It looks like that Bodo's commit (see below) has fixed the reported problem.
So the bug can be closed and set to fixed.
Best regards,
This should be fixed by commit
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=16682
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
The SHA1 was recreated and the tarball was resigned by myself.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[jaenicke - Fri Oct 19 11:39:05 2007]:
This will never be fixed in the 0.9.8f tarball (as it was rolled as is).
OpenSSL 0.9.8g has now been released using a correct version code.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL
Fixed in 0.9.8g
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your statement is actually correct. Nevertheless it does not seem to be
useful to create
a new release (0.9.8g) just to correct an informational version number
code. It also
would not be a good idea to create a new tarball with the same name but
just a new
version number code.
We have therefore
I have made the following modifications to the download area (not
tracked by CVS, so the
action is not logged via openssl-cvs) at Wed Oct 17, 2007, 09:30 CEST
(07:30GMT):
* updated openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.sha1
* created new openssl-0.9.8f.tar.gz.asc with my (Lutz Jaenicke) personal
key matching
Grr. The OpenSSL web site is some (semi-)automatic thing that is updated
in a magic way. Probably only Ralf Engelschall fully understands how
this works :-)
I have made sure the correct files are linked now.
Best regards,
Lutz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 17 18:11:27 2007]:
Starting with OpenSSL 0.9.8f, ssl3_get_client_hello() no longer tests
whether the client proposed a
previous session_id before trying to process it. In previous releases,
a new session was always
created if no previous session was proposed
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
A respective compile time macro PEDANTIC (to be added to the C flags
as -DPEDANTIC)
has been added for OpenSSL 0.9.8f. The behavior has been clarified in
the manual page
and the FAQ
__
OpenSSL Project
Guessing on the stack being non-predictable does not seem to improve
entropy too much to me. I have therefore modified the code to no longer
use uninitialized memory in any case.
Not relying on -DPURIFY will also make valgrind users happy :-)
Best regards,
Lutz
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev trees.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Applied to openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-dev.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing the mail gateway before declaring it live.
__
OpenSSL Project http
Lutz Jaenicke via RT schrieb:
Testing the new installation of RT for OpenSSL before declaring it live.
Testing with modified settings. Duplicate emails to openssl-dev should
now be gone.
Hopefully...
Best regards,
Lutz
The attached patch fixes an incorrect handling of special characters.
Patch is against 0.9.8d.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Atul Kulkarni (SIGSEC) via RT wrote:
That seems to be a bug with openssl dev package, as I am trying to build
on a native ppc64 machine why should it add a -b directive asking for a
cross-compilation machine. Please note my code compiles without it
though!
If there is any specific reason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 19 11:06:08 2005]:
Hi.
We had a report of sshd looping and eating CPU under some conditions
(reference below). The original report was on Solaris 8, we had other on
HP-UX 11.11 and I have reproduced it on HP-UX 11.00. It can probably
occur on any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Feb 16 19:43:23 2005]:
There is a typo in openssl/doc/crypto/blowfish.pod in your CVS
repository. Please see the attached diff.
Patch applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Ralf Hauser via RT wrote:
Hi,
http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/smime.html# offers
openssl smime [-encrypt] ... [-des3] ... [-rc2-128]
Are there any plans to also support -aes256 or stronger?
-aes256 is supported (openssl smime help). It has just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 14 14:32:32 2004]:
I have the same problem, do you already have a solution?
If not, and you are interessted: I`d like to work with you on this...
maybe together we will find a solution...
So please let us repeat the question:
What version of gcc do you use? On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 14 22:17:46 2004]:
I'm finding that the output from RC4 is different for Linux and
Solaris once
the key strength 144. However, Linux and Win32 produce the same RC4
results up to 2048 bits.
I have including a short program that can reproduce the following
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:34:29AM +0100, Martin Witzel via RT wrote:
Thank you, Lutz. I have two comments:
The 'time' parameter is listed in the synopsis line but not among the
options.
It could read somewhere along the lines of Specifies how long (in seconds)
s_time should establish
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 30 11:32:55 2003]:
Hello OpenSSL developers,
While waiting for OpenSSL to compile I was looking around in the code
and saw my own contribution in rand_win.c. It refers to a Microsoft URL
that's no longer valid. The updated URL is in the attached patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Apr 10 08:28:02 2003]:
I noticed that, among other parts, the documentation of s_time has not
yet been worked out. If you can use the attached *.html file as a basis
for your online documentation, feel free to include it on your web page.
Regards, Martin Witzel
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:55:32PM +0100, Kirill Kochetkov via RT wrote:
type/block size in openssl speed is just buffer size for calling cbc
routines.
and block size is fixed for different algorithms (as 8 bytes for DES).
but now I don't clear about type. Is it simply input data size and can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 11 08:16:12 2003]:
I have a simple program that uses the BIO printf functionality:
#include stdio.h
#include openssl/bio.h
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
BIO *myBio = BIO_new_fp(stdout, 0);
BIO_printf(myBio, float: %.1f\n, (float) 1000.1234);
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:50:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
But it never went any further than that, ie. a discussion. Please feel
free to open an RT ticket about this and assign ownership to me if you
like so that it doesn't slip through the cracks...
It was my pleasure...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Feb 19 10:38:19 2003]:
Parallel make, eg. make -j 7 fails now.
This patch correct it.
Thanks, patch applied.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Feb 24 17:43:50 2003]:
OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003
built on: Mon Feb 24 14:33:03 2003
platform: VC-WIN32
options: bn(64,32) md2(int) rc4(idx,int) des(idx,cisc,4,long)
blowfish(idx)
compiler: cl /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2 /Ob2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo
[levitte - Thu Mar 20 11:39:53 2003]:
Is this still an issue, and if it is, have you tested version 0.9.7a,
and does the problem still remain?
If you still have problems, please send a full log of configuration
and building. Thanks.
No more correspondence was sent for 6 months. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Mar 20 12:01:22 2003]:
I'd like to ask you to please consider fetching
ftp://ftp.openssl.org/snapshot/openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-
20030319.tar.gz
and test it, to determine if we need to do more fixing *before*
release of 0.9.7b (if possible). Otherwise, you
[levitte - Mon Dec 1 13:18:42 2003]:
Uh, are you sure you attached ibm.patch? I can't seem to see that
patch.
Yes, the patch was attached to the Mail (some 2.x MB)... I will attach a
compressed version to this reply.
Best regards,
Lutz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Nov 22 18:26:42 2003]:
--- 1055,1061
if (engine == NULL)
return;
if ((fd = get_dev_crypto()) 0)
+ ENGINE_free (engine);
return;
That's can't be right. Missing curly braces?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 13 09:24:50 2003]:
How do you do?
I found it is impossible to create RPM packages
of Openssl 0.9.7c with the openssl.spec in the
source archive. There is an failure in Makefile.org.
Mode of directory /usr/lib/pkgconfig is set to
0644.
Thanks. The bug has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 6 17:08:31 2003]:
While running the make command to build version 9.7c, I get the
following errors. My system is OpenBSD i386. Please help me fix this
bug, if it is in fact a bug with OpenSSL
...
des-586.s:2458: Error: Unimplemented segment type 151680 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 6 17:05:28 2003]:
Hi,
while upgrading to 0.9.7c on my old SunOS 4.1.4 box I am getting the
following error:
| making all in test...
| if [ = hpux-shared -o = darwin-shared ] ; then \
| gcc -o destest -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_SUNOS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 19 19:56:49 2003]:
Hi,
when i run ./config i get:
Operating system: sun4u-sun-solaris2
./config: test: unknown operator (GCC)
OpenSSL-0.9.4 is outdated and buggy (including security issues). Please
upgrade to 0.9.7c or at least to 0.9.6l.
It may be the case
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:50:41AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:38:04 +0100 (MET), Andy
Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt Now, the really cool thing would be if someone (you?) could provide us
rt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 29 08:34:31 2003]:
Hello!
It's me agaig :)
I change speed.c for benchmarking AES methods too.
It was easy :)
May be it will help you.
Thanks, I have applied your changes to CVS.
Best regards,
Lutz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 17 14:49:59 2003]:
Lutz Jaenicke via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmm. Between OpenSSL 0.9.6 and 0.9.7, the following change was made
(see the corresponding util/libeay.num files):
OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms 508 EXIST::FUNCTION:
became
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 20 15:20:21 2003]:
In trying to build ethier the OpenSSL_0_9_7c or OpenSSL_0_9_7-stable
branch on OpenServer 5 I discovered a change to Makefile.org that
caused the build to fail.
revision 1.154.2.63
date: 2003/05/29 22:20:55;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 12 09:01:22 2003]:
There's a typo in the names for the shared object libraries under
linux/390 which leads to libraries
libcrypto.so.0,9.6
instead of
libcrypto.so.0.9.6
being built.
...
Thanks, patch applied.
Best regards,
Lutz
[jaenicke - Wed Apr 30 15:46:39 2003]:
[jaenicke - Mon Apr 28 10:56:55 2003]:
I consider this to be a bug in the AIX 5.2 select() routine.
Please
file
a bug report.
In the meantime I have received information from Craig Anthony
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The AIX 5.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 16 12:01:29 2003]:
Hello folks,
there seems to be a minor bug
in the pasword getter:
Thanks, I have applied the change.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 9 11:26:14 2003]:
MingW / gcc 3.3.1 / Win-XP / OpenSSL 0.9.8-dev (29 Oct 2003)
libeay32.dll is missing orinal 508 in it's export table.
c:\ pedump libeay32.dll:
exports table:
Name:libeay32.dll
Characteristics:
TimeDateStamp:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Nov 7 09:14:32 2003]:
Hi
i have a sun cobalt RAQ XTR,i used BluelinQ from web
management to update the Apache and SSL everything did
properly and the message informed me to reboot
the server to apply changes.after reboot the server,i
couldn't see any web page on
[guest - Thu Oct 30 23:51:10 2003]:
Using the null cipher is causing us some problems with 0.9.7c. Not sure
how important this is but for one it causes at least one 0 byte malloc
that causes efence to barf:
#0 0x4032d5f1 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40017eb6 in EF_Abort () from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 1 14:46:51 2003]:
Hi,
Makefiles of 0.9.7c have a new line:
chmod 644 $(INSTALL_PREFIX)$(INSTALLTOP)/lib/pkgconfig
I believe you wanted to write
chmod 644 $(INSTALL_PREFIX)$(INSTALLTOP)/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc
Thanks. An appropriate fix has already been
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:40:10AM +0200, Ron Whiteside via RT wrote:
The krb5.h header file is missing from the tar ball openssl-0.9.7b.
The krb5.h header file is part of the Kerberos suite.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:08:42PM +0200, Ron Whiteside via RT wrote:
I understand that. I think you could include a dummy header file:
#define OpenSSL_NO_KRB5
The default is to build without KRB5 support. Related problems should
only occur, if the user explicitly demands KRB5 support.
What
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:29:34PM +0200, Ron Whiteside via RT wrote:
Standard Red Hat Linux 9 as shipped on their CD's.
In this case I would recommend to send a bug report to Redhat; seems they
do not have their dependencies set up correctly.
The NO_KRB5 setting is contained in opensslconf.h
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 07:52:00PM +0200, via RT wrote:
The example in this man page shows the creation of a bio pair and then
setting them as the io bios for an ssl object. It states that the
internal bio is implicitly deallocated when SSL-free is called on the
ssl object. This does not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 14 18:31:26 2003]:
Dear OpenSSL Team
we took the liberity and have created a mirror site for OpenSSL. It
can be
accessed at http://www.binarycode.org/openssl
The mirror is being updated daily by cron and the server is located in
Austin, Tx, United States.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed May 14 21:02:54 2003]:
http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/linux/docs/HOWTO/other-formats/html_singl
e/SSL-Certificates-HOWTO.html
An SSL certiciates HOWTO has been released for a while on the www.tldp.org
web site. This document explains how to use openSSL in many
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 25 18:07:32 2003]:
Hi,
Sorry to be nagging again about compilation issues. I get the
following
error when trying to build with MD2 disabled:
In file included from md2test.c:62:
../include/openssl/md2.h:63:2: #error MD2 is disabled.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri May 23 09:50:04 2003]:
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030522 and openssl-SNAP-20030522 can't
build
under WindowsXPsp1 with VisualStudio2003 because there's un
uncompatibility
signed/unsigned in crypto/bn/bn_mul.c
line 709 for SNAP, and line 379 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 11 10:13:19 2003]:
Here is tiny whack to allow c_client to communicate with TLS enables
POP3 server. See patch attached.
Thanks for your submission. I have added you patch to both the stable
(0.9.7) and the development (0.9.8) tree.
Best regards,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri May 2 15:27:29 2003]:
Hi
By a mistake trying out openssl s_client -connect ip:5000 against a
windows XP system it hangs for a looong time before it timeouts. Is
it
possible to set a timeout function or this would be a good thing to
add?
Openssl s_client is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 25 09:42:02 2003]:
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
I think my machine has a decent set of patches but as I don't
have root
access I cannot really verify that. Do you think you can do
getconf ARG_MAX and getconf LINE_MAX on your
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:54:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
Since 5.2 AIX supports /dev/random and /dev/urandom. Openssl don't use it
because the select
system call works different on AIX than on linux.
As described in the following URL, the select system call expects the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Mar 26 20:14:51 2003]:
I noticed that SSL_CTX_free() takes all the sessions in the given
CTX's
internal session cache, and also removes them from the external
session cache
(i.e., calls the delete-session callback).
Thanks. I have added a slightly modified
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Mar 25 15:30:45 2003]:
Hi,
i've a problem compiling open ssl o.9.4. See the following output:
YA7:ffpbld : /eu/ffp/archive/src/openssl-0.9.4 make
making all in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory
`/eu/ffp/archive/src/openssl-0.9.4/crypto'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Feb 14 09:17:53 2003]:
and aftre the last command I obtain (actually it was the last command
to
do):
Certificate is to be certified until Feb 14 06:46:00 2004 GMT (365
days)
Sign the certificate? [y/n]:y
failed to update database
TXT_DB error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Feb 15 13:43:01 2003]:
testlog maketest.log make.log
Hello-
I am having an error trying to load SSL on a HPUX10.20
system. Any help would be appreciated.
Hmm. I use OpenSSL on HP-UX 10.20 myself.
$ configure -t
Operating system: 9000/889-hp-hpux10
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:40:37PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
I can understand why a general-purpose server might want to keep those
certificate around for session resumptions, but for my purposes (and probably
for the purposes of many other people), this is completely unnecessary: once
the
[levitte - Wed Dec 4 21:19:17 2002]:
MD5 is one of those algorithms that's used so much it isn't easy to
disable. However, you only had problems in two files with it, we're
apparently doing fine. I'll investigate and get back to you.
Hmm. In ssl/s3_srvr.c it seems, that both digest
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:09:22PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
Any more thoughts on this issue?
The problem is not yet solved. Using the global error stack as error indicator
instead of correctly passing state back via return values is a design flaw.
It happend to make problems in
[jaenicke - Wed Jan 15 12:30:08 2003]:
Any new information?
No response for another week.
I therefore close the ticket.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
