[openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-04 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Mark has kindly reported that the latest vms.mar works as expected on VAX. This ticket is therefore resolved. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing

RE[2]: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 03:17:31 +0100 (MET) From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:48:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it! (with neither email :^) Download it from the RT ticket. RT2 kindly did not sent the 100k attachement to the whole list :-) Best regards, Lutz --

RE[2]: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Download it from the RT ticket. RT2 kindly did not sent the 100k attachement to the whole list :-) Oh great! Now a whole list is going to know that this instruction is meaningless to me :^) Could you explain what is meant by Download it from the RT ticket. Thanks.

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:48:27 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it! Don't use any of them. It still doesn't work for all numbers. EDIV is very hard to use for divisors that it

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:48:27 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it! Don't use any of them. It still doesn't work for all numbers. EDIV is very hard to use for divisors that it

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:01:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: Download it from the RT ticket. RT2 kindly did not sent the 100k attachement to the whole list :-) Oh great! Now a whole list is going to know that this instruction is meaningless to me :^) Could you explain what

RE[3]: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
O'Oh, more embarressment. I have just (accidentally) deleted your reply. Would you mind resending. TIA. Download it from the RT ticket. RT2 kindly did not sent the 100k attachement to the whole list :-) Oh great! Now a whole list is going to know that this instruction is meaningless to me

[openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[levitte - Fri Nov 29 17:31:16 2002]: Another question: have you tried defining the logical name OPENSSL_NO_ASM with the value YES before building? If you build it that way, it should work. I'm assuming the problem lies in [.CRYPTO.BN.ASM]VMS.MAR, and if you can verify that it runs all

RE: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Hi Richard, It seems as if you have answered your own earlier suggestion to me. I can confirm this. With OPSNSSL_NO_ASM defined true BETA 4 builds, tests and works with WASD OK for me too. I was working my way back down the BETAs, 4 - 3 - 2 ..., looking for one that would work, when I read

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 1 Dec 2002 01:02:16 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt It seems as if you have answered your own earlier suggestion to me. I rt can confirm this. With OPSNSSL_NO_ASM defined true BETA 4 builds, tests rt and works with WASD OK

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
The vms.mar I sent you had a small but important bug. Please try this one instead. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex

[openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-29 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Another question: have you tried defining the logical name OPENSSL_NO_ASM with the value YES before building? If you build it that way, it should work. I'm assuming the problem lies in [.CRYPTO.BN.ASM]VMS.MAR, and if you can verify that it runs all tests correctly when OPENSSL_NO_ASM if

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:16 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Builds OK on rt rt Compaq C V6.4-005 on OpenVMS VAX V7.3 rt Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V5.3 rt on a VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS V7.3 rt

Re: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:56:16 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Builds OK on rt rt Compaq C V6.4-005 on OpenVMS VAX V7.3 rt Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V5.3 rt on a VAXstation 4000-60 running OpenVMS V7.3 rt

RE[2]: [openssl.org #366] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta4.tar.gz

2002-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
I didn't try the VAX version (that I can remember - but it's not on my home VAXstation system so I'd say not). I could grab it tomorrow and try. Regards, Mark. ++ Mark Daniel