On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
There will not be another release of 0.9.6 before 0.9.7 will be out.
We still maintain the 0.9.6 tree, because we anticipate that due to
incompatible changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 several people will stay
with 0.9.6x for some more time, so we
From CHANGES:
*) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
and UnixWare.
[Richard Levitte]
Just wanted to let you guys know, that also
this symbol is in use by
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-1] Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Hmm, it feels like it's really time for a rename (basically, change
des to DES in all names, and thereby follow the convention used
everywhere else in OpenSSL), or this becomes an impossible
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sniper From CHANGES:
sniper
sniper *) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
sniper with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
sniper and
From: Jani Taskinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sniper From CHANGES:
sniper
sniper *) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
sniper with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
sniper and UnixWare.
sniper [Richard Levitte]
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 14 12:02:20 2002]:
From CHANGES:
*) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
and UnixWare.
[Richard Levitte]
Just wanted
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 14 12:02:20 2002]:
From CHANGES:
*) Rename 'des_encrypt' to 'des_encrypt1'. This avoids the clashes
with des_encrypt() defined on some operating systems, like Solaris
and UnixWare.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 08:34:06PM +0200, Jani Taskinen via RT wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
This problem has been resolved for 0.9.7...
Great.
Is it worthwile to make a small adjustment for 0.9.6e (in case it will
be released)?
If 0.9.7 is due to
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
There will not be another release of 0.9.6 before 0.9.7 will be out.
We still maintain the 0.9.6 tree, because we anticipate that due to
incompatible changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 several people will stay
with 0.9.6x for some more time, so we
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 14 22:02:06 2002]:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
There will not be another release of 0.9.6 before 0.9.7 will be out.
We still maintain the 0.9.6 tree, because we anticipate that due to
incompatible changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 several
10 matches
Mail list logo
