Re: [openssl.org #333] x509.pod

Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote: I guess that in this case =head1 B is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better workaround saving the section name for the next generation ;-) Ok, I have finally

[openssl.org #342] Linking with libeay32.a and libssl32.a

I'll admit I don't know anything about Mingw32. And I know just a little bit about Windows. In Windows, there's the concept of import libraries, and if I understand the Mingw32 building procedures properly, libeay32.a and libssl32.a are import libraries that map to libeay32.dll and

[openssl.org #184] OpenVMS openssl-0.9.7-beta3.tar.gz

Mark let me know that after my last tweak, this is not an issue any more. Therefore, this ticket is now resolved. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development

[openssl.org #345] openssl 0.9.6g

Hello, I am trying to configure/make the above version of ssl on my vanilla true64 5.1a unix box. I am receiveing the below error: Can't locate strict.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0/alp ha-dec_osf /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0

Re: [openssl.org #333] x509.pod

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:18:13AM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote: Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote: I guess that in this case =head1 B is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better

Re: [openssl.org #345] openssl 0.9.6g

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:23:17 +0100 (MET), Wieckowski, Tom via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Can't locate strict.pm in @INC (@INC contains: rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0/alp rt ha-dec_osf /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0 rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0 rt

Re: [openssl.org #345] openssl 0.9.6g

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:23:17 +0100 (MET), Wieckowski, Tom via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Can't locate strict.pm in @INC (@INC contains: rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0/alp rt ha-dec_osf /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/5.6.0 rt /usr/lib/perl-5.6.0/lib/site_perl/5.6.0 rt

Re: IMPORTANT: Please try the 0.9.6 snapshots

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:05:52 +0100, Igal Ore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: iore --- iore Windows 2000 SP2 Pentium iore III iore OpenSSL 0.9.6h-dev [engine] xx XXX [...] iore ms\mingw32.bat failed at first time iore

Re: OpenSSL Bug

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:14:49AM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:14:54PM -0800, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: I was doing application development (not the topic of this email) interacting with an IBM developed SSL library. I experienced unexpected disconnects immediately

Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/bn bn_gf2m.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: bn_gf2m.c === RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 --- bn_gf2m.c 2002/10/29 10:58:07 1.8 +++

RE: [openssl.org #345] openssl 0.9.6g

Hello Richard. Thanks for the response. After I sent this email, I did further research. It looks like I'm missing some directories under perl 5.6.0. I compared to another system and found and found where I was missing strict.pm. You can close this problem. Thanks again for responding. regards,

Re: IMPORTANT: Please try the 0.9.6 snapshots

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Because of lack of time, and because I'm not entirely sure we've gotten all the reported bugs, I'm moving the release of 0.9.6h until thursday night (swedish time). Please test the snapshots for the 0.9.6 branch until then, on as many platforms as you have

[ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta 4 released

The fourth beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.7 is now available from the OpenSSL FTP site URL: ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/. This beta contains numerous fixes (among others, security-related ones) since beta 3, which explains the long time that has passed between the two. This is NOT a

0.9.7-beta4: can't compile with kerberos support

Hi, I tried these configuration options: --with-krb5-flavor=Heimdal \ --with-krb5-dir=/usr \ --with-krb5-lib=/usr \ --with-krb5-include=-I/usr/include/heimdal \ The build fails with these errors: make[1]: Entering directory

[openssl.org #346] 0.9.7-beta4: can't compile with kerberos support

Hi, I tried these configuration options: --with-krb5-flavor=Heimdal \ --with-krb5-dir=/usr \ --with-krb5-lib=/usr \ --with-krb5-include=-I/usr/include/heimdal \ The build fails with these errors: make[1]: Entering directory

[PATCH] supporting the x86_64 architecture

Hi! to facilitate building openssl on the x86_64 platform I suggest to apply the attached patch. A similar patch would fit 0.9.6, where one colon before -ldl has to be omitted. Peter -- Thought is limitation. Free your mind. diff -uNr openssl-0.9.7_beta4.orig/Configure

DJGPP patch for openssl-0.9.7

The following patch allows openssl-0.9.7 to compile under DJGPP. The process was broken by two recent changes. Gisle's patch left out some required headers. The changes for Cygwin added PATH directives incompatible with the DJGPP path separator of ; rather than :. In addition there seems to be an

TSU NOTIFICATION - encryption

SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU SUBMITTED BY: Doug Kaufman SUBMITTED FOR: POINT OF CONTACT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE and/or FAX: MANUFACTURER: (if relevant) PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: openssl-0.9.7 ECCN: 5D002 NOTIFICATION: The attached patch applies to openssl-0.9.7. The source

priority of compiler flags

Hi, the config/Configure script takes unknown flags that it finds on the command line and puts them through, as compiler flags. However, those flags will appear _before_ any compiler flags that are hardwired in Configure. It is not possible to override them without patching Configure. Since

0.9.7-beta4: test_rsa fails on ia64

Hi, the test 'trsa' in the testsuite fails on ia64: testing rsa conversions p - d p - p d - d make[1]: *** [test_rsa] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/openssl-0.9.7_beta4/test' make: *** [tests] Error 2 This is with gcc-3.2.1, glibc-2.3.1.

Re: priority of compiler flags

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:06:02PM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: However, those flags will appear _before_ any compiler flags that are hardwired in Configure. It is not possible to override them without patching Configure. Since I believe that is the wrong order of things, I attach a

Re: OpenSSL Bug

PS. Whether this is considered to be a bug on OpenSSL's side, or whether OpenSSL is correct in sending an empty fragment and the peer's software is incorrect, is another topic. OpenSSL clearly behaves according to the SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 specifications. If the IBM SSL library does not

RE: [openssl.org #347] DJGPP patch for openssl-0.9.7

Richard, I think the FLAT_INC in ectest.c was something you introduced when committing the Windows CE changes. It looks like other files, like enginetest.c, simply include openssl/e_os2.h. Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL