Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:55:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt * Wed Sep 25 2002 Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] rt - Don't do an explicit make build-shared, it's not needed and could only rt cause harm (link libssl against libcrypto

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300, Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I solar get is: solar solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however: solar solar 2. The

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:54:31 +0300, Solar Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: solar I've now tried removing the patch from our 0.9.6g package and what I solar get is: solar solar 1. Both versions appear to produce a working library now, however: solar solar 2. The

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all rt make Makefile.ssl rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:26:26 +0100 (MET), Solar Designer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt Well, I left it in because the original Makefile would build it too. rt Is that just to support Configure rsaref? Yes. -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all rt make Makefile.ssl rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-14 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-13 Thread Ben Laurie
Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked