Re: [openssl-project] OpenSSL 3.0 and FIPS Update

2019-02-14 Thread Michael Richardson
l me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ signature.asc Description: PGP signature _

Re: Thoughts about library contexts

2019-02-18 Thread Michael Richardson
Paul Dale wrote: > Library contexts are going to allow us to separate different portions of the > TLS/cryptographic activity within one application. No problems, here. This > seems like a useful and worthwhile idea. It will e.g. be a way to separate > FIPS and non-FIPS streams ni

Re: Reordering new API's that have a libctx, propq

2020-09-10 Thread Michael Richardson
cted.) -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Project direction

2020-11-02 Thread Michael Richardson
7;s a pre-requisite for. The sectional and version organization of the web site is a bit wonky. We need links from the 0.9.8 version of the man pages to the "most recent", as the older pages get better Google SEO. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mes

Re: Project direction (fwd) Michael Richardson: Re: Project direction

2020-11-02 Thread Michael Richardson
ts do not serve as particularly good examplars, because of the mix of C and perl, sometimes the perl is just running some .c code that was compiled... sometimes not. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works

Re: Project direction

2020-11-02 Thread Michael Richardson
| ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Re-arrange the library structure - Re: CMP is a subproject?

2022-07-20 Thread Michael Richardson
things would be a 4.0 > In particular, as Tomas wrote, the openssl app will continue to provide > everything that it did before. I have advocated in the past splitting the "openssl" app into a new repo which could evolve at a different rate, and with a different l