SSL alert number 80

Good morning, Can anybody help me with my problem? I have trouble connecting Sony Ericsson Z310 phone to sendmail over TLS. When trying to send message I'm getting following message: sending server not found On the server side there is message in syslog: STARTTLS=server:

Re: SSL alert number 80

According to RFC 2246, the alert number 80 represents an internal error. Here is the description from the RFC internal_error An internal error unrelated to the peer or the correctness of the protocol makes it impossible to continue (such as a memory allocation failure).

Re: SSL alert number 80

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 00:13 -0700, Paras Shah wrote: According to RFC 2246, the alert number 80 represents an internal error. Here is the description from the RFC internal_error An internal error unrelated to the peer or the correctness of the protocol makes it impossible to

Re: SSL alert number 80

Hello, According to RFC 2246, the alert number 80 represents an internal error. Here is the description from the RFC internal_error An internal error unrelated to the peer or the correctness of the protocol makes it impossible to continue (such as a memory

Re: SSL alert number 80

One more short question. Where this alert was created? On server or client side? This alert (in this case) is created on client and sent to server. Thanks a lot. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Segmentation fault in application creating too many threads.

Hi Gayathri, I couldn't entirely grasp what you had mentioned. l didn't find sha1 in lsmod command output. If you could describe briefly the issue you had experienced that would be very much helpful. Thanks Regards, Prabhu. S On 10/15/07, Gayathri S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Prabhu, Can

Re: Segmentation fault in application creating too many threads.

Hi David, Yes, the design of one thread per connection is bit odd. Our application is used to test a SSL server for its performance. The application would simulate hundreds of client and at a time try connecting to the server. The server would be thus tested for burst connection handling

Re: Segmentation fault in application creating too many threads.

On 10/16/07, Prabhu S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi David, Yes, the design of one thread per connection is bit odd. Our application is used to test a SSL server for its performance. The application would simulate hundreds of client and at a time try connecting to the server. The server

64 bit openssl install

I am trying to install Openssl 0.9.8e on a 64 bit Red Hat Enterprise 4 ES update 4, duel Opteron system. It is pretty much a generic install and I have updated Zlib to 1.2.3.  I ran the: ./config make make test make install    But when I do an ssh -V it still shows the old version and findssl.sh

Re: 64 bit openssl install

I have tried: ./config --prefix=/usr/bin --openssldir=/usr/local/openssl make make test make install This would have installed openssl into /usr/bin/lib, /usr/bin/bin, /usr/bin/include, ... You might have wanted --prefix=/usr Jim

openssl.exe question

I'm attempting to implement some single sign-on code from this site: http://www.single-signon.com/en/single-signon.html I downloaded their PHP-based agent code, and successfully run it on our IIS7 server. The PHP code can use either PHP's internal openssl code, or can be configured to use

64 bit install

Looking at the output from the findssl.sh it appears that the openssl install is not installing the 64 bit files. Can anyone point me to how to get the 64 bit files installed? Searching for OpenSSL shared library files. 0x0090805fL /usr/lib/libcrypto.so 0x0090805fL /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8

Fw: 64 bit openssl install

Looking at the output from the findssl.sh it appears that the openssl install is not installing the 64 bit files. Can anyone point me to how to get the 64 bit files installed? Searching for OpenSSL shared library files. 0x0090805fL /usr/lib/libcrypto.so 0x0090805fL

VeriSign certificate with openssl

Hi All, We have a web server running on Apache/Tomcat platform (Sun Solaris 10) with a VeriSign certificate. I'm trying to use the same certificate with openssl 0.9.8f for my stand-alone web services application (listening on separate ports, of course). So I followed the procedure as in

RE: openssl.exe question

I ran this command line: openssl rsautl -verify -in mysignaturefile.sig -pubin -inkey public.key -asn1parse ...and got this: Loading 'screen' into random state - done RSA operation error 5924:error:0406706C:rsa routines:RSA_EAY_PUBLIC_DECRYPT:data greater than mod

RE: openssl.exe question

Hello, I ran this command line: openssl rsautl -verify -in mysignaturefile.sig -pubin -inkey public.key -asn1parse …and got this: Loading 'screen' into random state - done RSA operation error 5924:error:0406706C:rsa routines:RSA_EAY_PUBLIC_DECRYPT:data greater than

Re: VeriSign certificate with openssl

Hello, We have a web server running on Apache/Tomcat platform (Sun Solaris 10) with a VeriSign certificate. I'm trying to use the same certificate with openssl 0.9.8f for my stand-alone web services application (listening on separate ports, of course). So I followed the procedure as in

Re: VeriSign certificate with openssl

Thanks for the quick response. The missing piece was Root CA certificate. I downloaded (1) VeriSign's intermediate CA cert from VeriSign web site and (2) VeriSign's Root CA from IE browser, and put them into one CA cert file. As you described, the subject-issuer chain is now complete.

RE: openssl.exe question - SOLVED

It was stup0id programmer tricks. I thought I had the signature properly decoded. Once I got that ironed out, all my problems went away. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marek Marcola Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:48 PM To:

Re: VeriSign certificate with openssl

Hello, We have a web server running on Apache/Tomcat platform (Sun Solaris 10) with a VeriSign certificate. I'm trying to use the same certificate with openssl 0.9.8f for my stand-alone web services application (listening on separate ports, of course). So I followed the procedure as in

RE: Segmentation fault in application creating too many threads.

--- David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is really one of those don't do that then things. Thread-per-connection is well-known to break down at about 750 connections. [snip] It may help to reduce the stack size for each thread. But you really should re-architect.