On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:22 +, Young, Alistair wrote:
* is it possible to define our own curves (rather than using
one of the predefined curves)?
if you want to play with your EC, check crypto/ec/ectest.c
if you want to add a new curve to openssl, have a look at
crypto/ec/ec_curve.c,
ourselves which links to the FIPS
library.
Regards,
Alistair.
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Emanuele Cesena
Sent: 23 January 2009 08:24
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: ECDSA signature verification
- is there an extra 'not' in this statement?),
but that perhaps doesn't cover ECDSA.
Alistair.
-Original Message-
From: Young, Alistair
Sent: 23 January 2009 10:13
To: 'openssl-users@openssl.org'
Subject: RE: ECDSA signature verification
Thank you, Emanuele.
We really need to use the FIPS
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:13 +, Young, Alistair wrote:
We really need to use the FIPS version of OpenSSL, so updating the code
isn't a possiblity.
ah ok, so maybe you can just skip EVP.
bye!
--
Emanuele Cesena emanuele.ces...@gmail.com
http://ecesena.dyndns.org
Il corpo non ha ideali
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009, Young, Alistair wrote:
... though I notice that the Security Policy document does not
explicitly mention ECDSA in the table of FIPS approved algorithms.
It does mention DSA with 1024-bit keys (but has a confusing footnote
which states that DSA supports a key size of
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: 23 January 2009 13:07
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: ECDSA signature verification
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009, Young, Alistair wrote
